Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T07:22:17.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indian Political Representations in Britain during the Transition to Colonialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2004

MICHAEL H. FISHER
Affiliation:
Oberlin College

Extract

During the transition to colonialism, over thirty Indian political missions ventured to London. Representing the interests of Indian royalty directly in British public discourse, these Indian diplomats strove to reshape colonial policies. They also gathered first-hand intelligence, unmediated by Britons, for their Indian audiences; some later Indian diplomats evidently learned from their precursors. Nonetheless, they increasingly struggled against spreading British colonialism, with its expanding surveillance and control over political communication, growing colonial archives, ever more dominant military force, and cultural assertions. Nor did their relatively isolated efforts accumulate into unified Indian policies. The dynamics of these unequal contests reveal how multi-centered, conflicted, and contingent was political intercourse over this period, in Britain and in India. This article analyzes these Indian missions, concentrating on two: one from early in the transition to colonialism when all parties were exploring the nature of such interactions, and the other late in that process when some Indian diplomats and, even more so, the Company's Directors, had learned to deploy more sophisticated tactics against each other. The 1857 conflict, which ended the Company's rule and established British royal authority over India, altered imperial relations with India's ‘princes’ profoundly, ushering in high colonial rule.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Paula Richman, Lee Schlesinger, Stuart Gordon, Douglas E. Haynes, Ian Barrow, and the ‘South Asia, 1780–1840’ workshop for their valuable comments on this paper. I also acknowledge the financial support for this research from the American Council of Learned Societies and Oberlin College. This article draws on material related to my larger study: Counterflows to Colonialism: Visitors and Settlers from India in Britain, c. 1600–1857 (Delhi: Permanent Black, 2004).