Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T10:46:06.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nickel-reduced graphene oxide composite foams for electrochemical oxidation processes: towards biomolecule sensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2018

S. Thoufeeq
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala-682022, India
Pankaj Kumar Rastogi
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research––Hyderabad, Sy. No. 36/P, Gopanapally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Hyderabad-500 107, India
Narayanaru Sreekanth
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research––Hyderabad, Sy. No. 36/P, Gopanapally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Hyderabad-500 107, India
Malie Madom Ramaswamy Iyer Anantharaman*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Inter-University Center for Nanomaterials and Devices, Kerala-682022, India
Tharangattu N. Narayanan*
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research––Hyderabad, Sy. No. 36/P, Gopanapally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Hyderabad-500 107, India
*
Address all correspondence to Malie Madom Ramaswamy Iyer Anantharaman at mraiyer@yahoo.com, Tharangattu N. Narayanan at tnn@tifrh.res.in, tn_narayanan@yahoo.com
Address all correspondence to Malie Madom Ramaswamy Iyer Anantharaman at mraiyer@yahoo.com, Tharangattu N. Narayanan at tnn@tifrh.res.in, tn_narayanan@yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Metal–graphene composites are sought after for various applications. A hybrid light-weight foam of nickel (Ni) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), called Ni-rGO, is reported here for small molecule oxidations and thereby their sensing. Methanol oxidation and non-enzymatic glucose sensing are attempted with the Ni-rGO foam via electrocatalytically, and an enhanced methanol oxidation current density of 4.81 mA/cm2 is achieved, which is ~1.7 times higher than that of bare Ni foam. In glucose oxidation, the Ni-rGO electrode shows a better sensitivity over bare Ni foam electrode where it could detect glucose linearly over a concentration range of 10 µM to 4.5 mM with a very low detection limit of 3.6 µM. This work demonstrates the synergistic effects of metal and graphene in oxidative processes, and also shows the feasibility of scalable metal–graphene composite inks development for small molecule printable sensors and fuel cell catalysts.

Type
2D Nanomaterials for Healthcare and Lab-on-a-Chip Devices Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

1.Liu, Y., Cao, X., Kong, R., Du, G., Asiri, A.M., Lu, Q., and Sun, X.: Cobalt phosphide nanowire array as an effective electrocatalyst for non-enzymatic glucose sensing. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 19011904 (2017).Google Scholar
2.Lou, Y., Li, C., Gao, X., Bai, T., Chen, C., Huang, H., Liang, C., Shi, Z., and Feng, S.: Porous Pt nanotubes with high methanol oxidation electrocatalytic activity based on original bamboo-shaped Te nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 1614716153 (2016).Google Scholar
3.Wu, S., Liu, J., Tian, Z., Cai, Y., Ye, Y., Yuan, Q., and Liang, C.: Highly dispersed ultrafine Pt nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets: in situ sacrificial template synthesis and superior electrocatalytic performance for methanol oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 2293522940 (2015).Google Scholar
4.Kaur, B., Prathap, M.U.A., and Srivastava, R.: Synthesis of transition-metal exchanged nanocrystalline ZSM-5 and their application in electrochemical oxidation of glucose and methanol. Chem. Plus Chem. 77, 11191127 (2012).Google Scholar
5.Luo, L., Zhu, L., and Wang, Z.: Nonenzymatic amperometric determination of glucose by CuO nanocubes-graphene nanocomposite modified electrode. Bioelectrochemistry 88, 156163 (2012).Google Scholar
6.Yang, J., Cho, M., and Lee, Y.: Synthesis of hierarchical Ni(OH)2 hollow nanorod via chemical bath deposition and its glucose sensing performance. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 222, 674681 (2016).Google Scholar
7.Cui, X., Guo, W., Zhou, M., Yang, Y., Li, Y., Xiao, P., Zhang, Y., and Zhang, X.: Promoting effect of Co in NimCon (m + n = 4) bimetallic electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 493503 (2015).Google Scholar
8.Danaee, I., Jafarian, M., Forouzandeh, F., Gobal, F., and Mahjani, M.G.: Electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol on Ni and NiCu alloy modified glassy carbon electrode. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33, 43674376 (2008).Google Scholar
9.Roychoudhury, A., Prateek, A., Basu, S., and Jha, S.K.: Preparation and characterization of reduced graphene oxide supported nickel oxide nanoparticle-based platform for sensor applications. J. Nanopart. Res. 20, 70 (2018). doi:10.1007/s11051-018-4173-y.Google Scholar
10.Lata, S., Batra, B., Karwasra, N., and Pundir, C.S.: An amperometric H2O2 biosensor based on cytochrome c immobilized onto nickel oxide nanoparticles/carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline modified gold electrode. Process Biochem. 47, 992998 (2012).Google Scholar
11.Niu, X., Lan, M., Zhao, H., and Chen, C.: Highly sensitive and selective nonenzymatic detection of glucose using three-dimensional porous nickel nanostructures. Anal. Chem. 85, 35613569 (2013).Google Scholar
12.Li, S.J., Xia, N., Lv, X.L., Zhao, M.M., Yuan, B.Q., and Pang, H.: A facile one-step electrochemical synthesis of graphene/NiO nanocomposites as efficient electrocatalyst for glucose and methanol. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 190, 809817 (2014).Google Scholar
13.Zhang, Y., Lei, W., Wu, Q., Xia, X., and Hao, Q.: Amperometric nonenzymatic determination of glucose via a glassy carbon electrode modified with nickel hydroxide and N-doped reduced graphene oxide. Microchim. Acta. 184, 31033111 (2017).Google Scholar
14.Radhakrishnan, S. and Kim, S.J.: Facile fabrication of NiS and a reduced graphene oxide hybrid film for nonenzymatic detection of glucose. RSC Adv. 5, 4434644352 (2015).Google Scholar
15.Choi, T., Kim, S.H., Lee, C.W., Kim, H., Choi, S.K., Kim, S.H., Kim, E., Park, J., and Kim, H.: Synthesis of carbon nanotube-nickel nanocomposites using atomic layer deposition for high-performance non-enzymatic glucose sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 63, 325330 (2015).Google Scholar
16.Cui, S., Li, L., Ding, Y., Zhang, J., Wu, Q., and Hu, Z.: Uniform ordered mesoporous ZnCo2O4 nanospheres for super-sensitive enzyme-free H2O2 biosensing and glucose biofuel cell applications. Nano Res. 10, 24822494 (2017).Google Scholar
17.Antolini, E. and Gonzalez, E.R.: Alkaline direct alcohol fuel cells. J. Power Sources 195, 34313450 (2010).Google Scholar
18.Zhao, X., Yin, M., Ma, L., Liang, L., Liu, C., Liao, J., Lu, T., and Xing, W.: Recent advances in catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 27362753 (2011).Google Scholar
19.Varcoe, J.R. and Slade, R.C.T.: Prospects for alkaline anion-exchange membranes in low temperature fuel cells. Fuel Cells 5, 187200 (2005).Google Scholar
20.Slade, R.C.T., Kizewski, J.P., Poynton, S.D., Zeng, R., and Varcoe, J.R.: Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology (Springer, New York, NY, 2012). doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3.Google Scholar
21.Lu, S.F., Pan, J., Huang, A.B., Zhuang, L., and Lu, J.T.: Alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cells completely free from noble metal catalysts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2061120614 (2008).Google Scholar
22.Liu, H., Song, C., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, H., and Wilkinson, D.P.: A review of anode catalysis in the direct methanol fuel cell. J. Power Sources 155, 95110 (2006).Google Scholar
23.Bianchini, C. and Shen, P.K.: Palladium-based electrocatalysts for alcohol oxidation in half cells and in direct alcohol fuel cells. Chem. Rev. 109, 41834206 (2009).Google Scholar
24.Rahim, M.A.A., Hameed, R.M.A., and Khalil, M.W.: Nickel as a catalyst for the electro-oxidation of methanol in alkaline medium. J. Power Sources 134, 160169 (2004).Google Scholar
25.Asgari, M., Maragheh, M.G., Davarkhah, R., and Lohrasbi, E.: Methanol electrooxidation on the nickel oxide nanoparticles∕multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode prepared using pulsed electrodeposition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, K225K229 (2011).Google Scholar
26.Chen, D. and Minteer, S.D.: Mechanistic study of nickel based catalysts for oxygen evolution and methanol oxidation in alkaline medium. J. Power Sources 284, 2737 (2015).Google Scholar
27.Bahar, T. and Yazici, M.S.: Immobilized glucose oxidase biofuel cell anode by MWCNTs, ferrocene, and polyethylenimine: electrochemical performance. Asia-Pacific J. Chem. Eng. 13, 19 (2018).Google Scholar
28.Leech, D., Kavanagh, P., and Schuhmann, W.: Enzymatic fuel cells: recent progress. Electrochim. Acta 84, 223234 (2012).Google Scholar
29.Toghill, K.E. and Compton, R.G.: Electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors: a perspective and an evaluation. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 5, 12461301 (2010).Google Scholar
30.Si, P., Huang, Y., Wang, T., and Ma, J.: Nanomaterials for electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose biosensors. RSC Adv. 3, 34873501 (2013).Google Scholar
31.Philip, M.R., Narayanan, T.N., Kumar, M.P., Aryaa, S.B., and Pattanayak, D.K.: Self-protected nickel-graphene hybrid low density 3D scaffolds. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 1948819494 (2014).Google Scholar
32.Marcano, D.C., Kosynkin, D.V., Berlin, J.M., Sinitskii, A., Sun, Z., Slesarev, A., Alemany, L.B., Lu, W., and Tour, J.M.: Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4, 183191 (2010).Google Scholar
33.Huang, W., Ding, S., Chen, Y., Hao, W., Lai, X., Peng, J., Tu, J., Cao, Y., and Li, X.: 3D NiO hollow sphere/reduced graphene oxide composite for high-performance glucose biosensor. Sci. Rep. 7, 111 (2017).Google Scholar
34.El-Shafei, A.A.: Electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol at a nickel hydroxide/glassy carbon modified electrode in alkaline medium. J. Electroanal. Chem. 471, 8995 (1999).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Thoufeeq et al. supplementary material 1

Thoufeeq et al. supplementary material

Download Thoufeeq et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 952.3 KB