Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T06:31:36.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corrosion Performance Projection of Yucca Mountain Waste Packages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Alberto A. Sagüés*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering University of South Florida Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The proposed high-level nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain relies heavily on the corrosion resistance of waste packages (WP) emplaced in tunnels bored through tuffaceous rock for adequate performance during the anticipated 10,000 years regulatory period. Present WP design uses a ∼20-mm-thick outer shell of Alloy 22 as the main corrosion-resistant barrier. The operating conditions may include an initial high-temperature (>96 °C) pulse that will last approximately several hundred to a thousand years. Ti-alloy shields are envisioned to prevent water from directly dripping on the WP. However, recent findings suggest that deliquescent salts and other contaminants on the WP surfaces may cause liquid water to form there, even at high temperatures. Current performance projections predict that during the anticipated regulatory period localized corrosion modes will be unlikely and that the Alloy 22 barrier will degrade primarily by very slow uniform dissolution, essentially under passive surface conditions. A review is presented of the assumptions and experimental findings leading to those projections, as well as a discussion of findings of a recent Workshop on the challenges involved in extrapolating limited information on corrosion behavior over an extremely long service period that extends beyond the time frame of common engineering experience. Potential mechanisms for deterioration of the passive regime that may be encountered under those circumstances are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management and Operating Contractor. Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Model for Site Recommendation. MDL-WIS-PA- 000002. Revision 00. Las Vegas, NV: Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management and Operating Contractor (2000)Google Scholar
2. office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Total System Description, TDR-CRWSE-000002. Revision 02, Washington, D.C. (2001).Google Scholar
3. Brossia, C.S., Browning, L., Dunn, D.S., Moghissi, O.C., Pensado, O. and Yang, L., Effect of Environment on the Corrosion of Waste Package and Drip Shield Materials, CNWRA 2001-03, Center for Nuclear waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, TX, September (2001).Google Scholar
4.Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management and Operating Contractor. Waste Package Degradation, Process Model Report. TDR-WDS-MD-000002. Revision 00. ICN 01, Las Vegas, NV: Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management and Operating Contractor (2000)Google Scholar
5. Sagüés, A.A., Scott, R., Rossi, J., J. Peña and Powers, R.G., ASCE's Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 12, p.220, (2000).Google Scholar
6. Uhlig, H.H., in Passivity of Metals, Frankenthal, R. P. and Kruger, J., Eds., p.1., The Electrochemical Society Inc., Princeton, NJ, (1978).Google Scholar
7. Sagüés, A.A., “Nuclear Waste Package Corrosion Behavior in the Proposed Yucca Mountain Repository”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 556, p.845 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Dunn, D.S., Brossia, C.S. and Pensado, O., “Long Term Dissolution Behavior of Alloy 22: Experiments and Modeling” Paper No. 125, Corrosion/01, NACE International, Houston, TX, (2001).Google Scholar
9. Sato, N., “Ion-Selective Rust Layers and Corrosion of Metals”, p. 281 in Passivity of Metals and Semiconductors, Ives, M., Luo, J. and Rodda, J., Eds, Proceedings Volume 99–42, The Electrochemical Society Inc., Princeton, NJ, (2001).Google Scholar
10. Suleiman, M. I., Ragault, I. and Newman, R.C., Corros. Sci., Vol. 36, p. 479, (1994)Google Scholar
11. Bojinov, M., Fabricius, G., Laitinen, T. and Saario, T., Electrochim. Acta, Vol. 44, p. 4331, (1999).Google Scholar
12. Hermansson, H. and Eriksson, S., Corrosion of the Copper Canister in the Repository Environment, SKI Report 99:52, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, December (1999).Google Scholar
13. Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management and Operating Contractor, Stress Corrosion Cracking of the Drip Shield, Waste Package Outer Barrier, and the Stainless Steel Structural Materials, ANL-EBS-MD-000005. Revision 00, Las Vegas, NV, April (2000).Google Scholar
14. Kehler, B., Ilevbare, G. and Scully, J.T., Crevice Corrosion Behavior of Ni-Cr-Mo Alloys: Comparison of Alloys 625 and 22, p.30 in Research Topical Symposium, Corrosion /01, NACE International, Houston, TX (2001).Google Scholar
15. Dunn, D.S., Cragnolino, G.A. and Sridhar, N., Corrosion, Vol. 56, p.90, (2000).Google Scholar
16. Barkatt, A. and Gorman, J.A., Tests To Explore Specific Aspects of The Corrosion Resistance of C-22. Presentation to Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, August 1, 2000, Carson City, NV (2000).Google Scholar
17. Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC, Technical Update Impact Letter Report Appendix E Summary of Recent Information Relevant to Waste Package and Drip Shield Process Model, MIS-MGR-RL-000001 REV 00, Las Vegas, NV, November (2001).Google Scholar
18. Beavers, J., Jones, R., Devine, T. Jr, Kelly, R., Frankel, G., Latanision, R. and Payer, J., Interim Report, Waste Package Materials Peer Review Panel, Presented to U.S. D.O.E., September 4, 2001.Google Scholar
19. Rosenberg, N.D., Gdowski, J.E. and Knauss, K.G., Appl. Geochem., Vol. 16, p. 1231, (2001).Google Scholar
20. Proceedings Following an International Workshop on Long-Term Extrapolation of Passive Behavior, July 19-20, 2001, Arlington, Virginia, Sagüés, A. and Bella, C. Di, Eds. U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Arlington, Virginia, (2001). Available at the NWTRB Web Site- see Ref. [21]. (The workshop participants were U. Bertocci, G. Cragnolino, A. Davenport, J. Kruger, D. Macdonald, B. MacDougall, P. Marcus, R. Newman, H. Pickering, R. Rapp, N. Sato, T. Shibata, S. Smialowska and H. Strehblow)Google Scholar
21.Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Web Site, www.nwtrb.gov.Google Scholar
22. Macdonald, D.D., Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 71, p.951 (1999).Google Scholar
23. Marcus, P. and Grimal, J., Corros. Sci. Vol. 31, p.377 (1990).Google Scholar