Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T17:00:11.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defect Model and Growth Characteristics of Low Temperature GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. Fatemi ,
B. Tadayon ,
H. B. Dietrich  and
S. Tadayon
M. Fatemi
Affiliation:
Electronics Science and Technology Division, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D.C. 20375-5000
B. Tadayon
Affiliation:
Electronics Science and Technology Division, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D.C. 20375-5000
H. B. Dietrich
Affiliation:
Electronics Science and Technology Division, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D.C. 20375-5000
S. Tadayon
Affiliation:
COMSAT Laboratory, Clarksburg, MD 20871
Get access

Abstract

Low-temperature GaAs layers (LTGaAs) grown by molecular beam epitaxy on GaAs substrates have been characterized by x-ray diffraction techniques. X-ray rocking curve measurements on more than 200 anneal conditions show that through appropriate choice of growth condition, layers with different states of strain are obtained. Three distinct ranges of low temperature growth are defined, labelled as “low-range,” “mid-range,” and “high-range,” corresponding to growth temperatures less than 260 °C, between 260 and 450 °C, and more than 450 °C, respectively. 0.5μm thick films grown in the low-range are amorphous, whereas those in the mid-range are fully strained and lattice-matched to the substrate, and those grown above 450 °C are indistinguishable from ordinary GaAs. Notable properties of mid-range layers are the random behavior of the as-grown strain, and the expansion and contraction of the lattice parameter with thermal anneals up to 900 °C. A growth model for LTGaAs based on arsenic antisite defects is proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 241 , 1991 , 137
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1-Smith, F., Calawa, R., Chen, C., Manfra, M., and Mahoney, L., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 9, 77 (1988).Google Scholar
2-Kaminska, M., Weber, E., Weber, Z., Leon, R., and Rek, Z., J. Vac. Sci. and Technol. B 7, 710 (1989).10.1116/1.584630Google Scholar
3-Eaglesham, D. J., Pfeiffer, L. N., West, K. W., and Dykaar, D. R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 (1), 65 (1991).Google Scholar
4-Gupta, S., Battacharya, P.K., Pamulapati, J., and Mourou, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (15), 1543 (1991).Google Scholar
5-Chen, C., Smith, F. W., Clifton, B. J., Mahoney, L. J., and Calawa, A. R., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 12, (6) 306 (1991).Google Scholar
6-Wie, C. R., Xie, K., Look, D. C., Evans, K. R., and Stuts, C.E., Proc. 6th Conf. on Semi-insulating IlI-V Materials, Toronto, Canada, pp 70–76, lOP Publishing Ltd, 1990.Google Scholar
7-Fatemi, M., Tadayon, B., and Dietrich, H. B., to be published.Google Scholar
8-Fatemi, M. and Stahlbush, R. E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (8), 825 (1991).Google Scholar