Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:56:58.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Definition of Multiple Bandgaps in Quantum-Dot Material by Intermixing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

A. Catrina Bryce
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom;
John H. Marsh
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom; Intense Photonics Ltd., 4 Stanley Boulevard, Hamilton International Technology Park, Blantyre, Glasgow, G72 0BN, United Kingdom.
Dan A. Yanson
Affiliation:
Intense Photonics Ltd., 4 Stanley Boulevard, Hamilton International Technology Park, Blantyre, Glasgow, G72 0BN, United Kingdom.
Olek P. Kowalski
Affiliation:
Intense Photonics Ltd., 4 Stanley Boulevard, Hamilton International Technology Park, Blantyre, Glasgow, G72 0BN, United Kingdom.
Shin-Sung Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom;
Get access

Abstract

We present the recent progress in the intermixing of InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot (QD) material. Quantum dot intermixing (QDI) allows the tuning of the energy bandgap in selected areas of the wafer or optoelectronic device, thus modifying its emission or absorption properties, in much the same way as in quantum well (QW) material. QDI has recently received increasing interest, as it combines bandgap engineering with the predicted advantages that quantum dots offer, such as low temperature-sensitivity of threshold current, high modulation frequency and low chirp.

We have applied the dielectric-cap-based techniques that were originally developed for QW structures, to the intermixing of InGaAs/GaAs/AlGaAs QD material with an emission wavelength of 1280 nm. Intermixing was achieved by sputtering a QDI-enhancing cap in some areas, and a QDI-suppressing cap in other areas, followed by a high-temperature anneal cycle. Extremely large bandgap blue-shifts of up to 280 nm have been obtained with an anneal temperature of 800 °C. The shifts were inferred from the photoluminescence (PL) spectra measured at 77 K under red-laser excitation.

To be of use in many applications, QDI must be able to provide a multiplicity of bandgaps on a single substrate. Multiple bandgaps can be created by varying the thickness of the QDI-enhancing cap, repeating the anneal cycle several times, or varying the coverage density of QDI-enhancing features over that of QDI-suppressing ones. The latter approach, termed selective intermixing in selected areas (SISA), involves the deposition of QDI-enhancing patterns of various area fill factors, which, upon annealing, will cause different degrees of intermixing in the underlying regions.

To demonstrate the SISA process in the QD material, we defined patterns containing lines and squares of various sizes (3 - 100 μm) and area fill factors (5% - 95%). The wafer was then annealed at 725 °C for 1 minute. As expected, the observed bandgap shifts were commensurate with the fill factor, with a 5% coverage providing a minimum shift (0 - 10 nm) and ∼40% a maximum one (∼ 120 nm). At fill factors above 40%, the shifts appeared to saturate and even decrease slightly. The effect of the feature size and shape was not very pronounced, with smaller features generating somewhat larger shifts. This may be due to the fabrication-related size bias that will have the strongest effect on the fill factor of smaller features. The PL spectra measured from patterns of large-size features (20 μm or more) often had a lopsided shape and broader peak width, which may be attributed to the limited spatial resolution of the measurement probe.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Leonard, D., Krishnamurthy, M., Reaves, C.M., Denbaars, S.P. and Petroff, P.M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 63 3203 (1993)Google Scholar
2. Ledentsov, N.N., Grundmann, M., Heinrichsdorff, F., Bimberg, D., Ustinov, V.M., Zhukov, A.E., Maximov, M.V., Alferov, Zh. I., Lott, J.A., J.A., , J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 6 439451 (2000)Google Scholar
3. Novikov, I.I., Maximov, M.V., Shernyakov, Y.M., Gordeev, N.Y., Kovsh, A.R., Zhukov, A.E., Mikhrin, S.S., Maleev, N.A., Vasil'ev, A.P., Ustinov, V.M., Alferov, Z.I., Ledentsov, N.N. and Bimberg, D., Semiconductors, 37 12391242 (2003)Google Scholar
4. Ledentsov, N.N., Kovsh, A.R., Zhukov, A.E., Maleev, N.A., Mikhrin, S.S., Vasil'ev, A.P., Sernenova, E.S., Maximov, M.V., Shernyakov, Y.M., Kryzhanovskaya, N., Ustinov, V. and Bimberg, D., Electron. Lett. 39 11261128 (2003)Google Scholar
5. Huyet, G., O'Brien, D., Carroll, O., Hegarty, S., Houlihan, J., McInerney, J. G., Muszalski, J., Corbett, B. and Uskov, A. V., Paper WAA1, LEOS Annual Meeting, 7th-11th November 2004.Google Scholar
6. Kovsh, A.R., Zhukov, A.E., Maleev, N.A., Mikhrin, S.S., Livshits, D.A., Shernyakov, Y.M., Maximov, M.V., Pihtin, N.A, Tarasov, I.S., Ustinov, V.M., Alferov, Z.I., Wang, J.S., Wei, L., Lin, G., Chi, J.Y., Ledentsovand, N.N., Bimberg, D., Microelectron. J., 34 491493 (2003)Google Scholar
7. Bhattacharya, P., Ghosh, S., Pradhan, S., Singh, J., Wu, Z.K., Urayama, J., Kim, K. and Norris, T.B., J. Quantum Electron., 39 952962 (2003)Google Scholar
8. Kim, S.M., Wang, Y., Keever, M. and Harris, J.S., Photonics Technol. Lett., 16 377379 (2004)Google Scholar
9. Marsh, J.H., Semicond. Sci. Technol., 8 11361155 (1993)Google Scholar
10. Kosogov, O. et al, 69 3072 (1996)Google Scholar
11. Leon, R., Kim, Y., Jagadish, C., Gal, M., Zou, J. and Cockayne, D.J.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69 1888 (1996)Google Scholar
12. Dubowski, J. J., Allen, C. N., and Fafard, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3583 (2000)Google Scholar
13. Ji, Y., Lu, W., Chen, G., Chen, X., and Wang, Q., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 1208 (2003).Google Scholar
14. Lever, P., Tan, H.H., Jagadish, C., Reece, P. and Gal, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 82 20532055 (2003)Google Scholar
15. Marsh, J. H., Bhattacharyya, D., Helmy, A. S., Avrutin, E. A., and Bryce, A. C., Physica A 8, 154 (2000)Google Scholar
16. Walker, C.L., Bryce, A.C. and Marsh, J.H., Photonics Technology Letters, 14, Pp 13911393 (2002)Google Scholar
17. Qiu, B.C., Liu, X.F., Ke, M.L., Lee, H.K., Bryce, A. C., Aitchison, J.S., Marsh, J.H., and Button, C.B., Photonics Technology Letters, 13, Pp 12921294 (2001)Google Scholar
18. Koteles, E.S., Elman, B., Melman, P., Chi, J.Y. and Armiento, C.A., Opt. & Quantum Electron. 23 S779S787 (1991)Google Scholar
19. Marsh, J.H., Bradshaw, S.A., Bryce, A.C., Gwilliam, R. and Glew, R.W., J. Electron. Mat. 20, 973–8 (1991).Google Scholar
20. Kowalski, O.P., Hamilton, C.J., McDougall, S.D., Marsh, J.H., Bryce, A.C., De La Rue, R.M., Vogele, B., Stanley, C.R., Button, C.C. and Roberts, J.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 581583 (1998)Google Scholar
21. Shimada, N., Fukumoto, Y., Uemukai, M., Suhara, T., Nishihara, H., and Larsson, A., IEEE J. Q. Elect., 7, 350351, (2001).Google Scholar
22. Miyazawa, T., Suzuki, Y., Kawamura, Y., Asai, H., and Mikami, O., Jap. J. Appl. Phys., 28, L7303 (1989).Google Scholar
23. Ooi, B. S., McIlvaney, K., Street, M. W., Helmy, A. A., Ayling, S. G., Bryce, A. C., Marsh, J. H., and Roberts, J. S., IEEE J. Q. Elect., 33, 17841793, (1997).Google Scholar
24. Ooi, B.S., Ayling, S.G., Bryce, A.C. and Marsh, J.H., Photon. Technol. Lett. 7 944946 (1995)Google Scholar