Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T18:11:50.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dislocation Dynamics During the Czochralski Growth of Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

C. T. Tsai
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Mechanics
O. W. Dillon Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Mechanics
R. J. De Angelis
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Material Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506
Get access

Abstract

The thermal stresses induced by temperature variations that exist during steady-state Czochralski growth produce plastic deformations in the crystal by dislocation motion and generation. The temperature variations in the crystal are calculated numerically by the finite element method (FEM). Employing the Haasen-Sumino viscoplastic response function for silicon and the calculated temperature profile, the thermal stresses, the dislocation densities, and the residual stresses in the crystal are also calculated. Only low dislocation densities are of interest and hence the associated viscoplastic deformations are found to be small. The assumption is made that there is a very low dislocation density along the solid-melt interface. The Haasen-Sumino material model is modified to include a back-stress to account for the locking effects due to the impurity concentration in the crystal. This analysis provides guidance for growing large diameter crystal of materials with known constitutive relations which have a low dislocation density and low thermal stresses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Jordan, A. S., Caruso, R., VonNeida, A. R., Nielsen, J. W., J. Appl. Phys. 52 (5), 3331 (1981)Google Scholar
2.Jordan, A. S., Caruso, R., and VonNeida, A. R., The Bell System Technical Journal, 593 (April, 1980).Google Scholar
3.Duseaux, M. and Jacob, G., Appl. Phys. Letters 40, 790 (1982).Google Scholar
4.Iwaki, T. and Kobayashi, N., Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mech. AM 48, 866 (1981).Google Scholar
5.Dillon, O. W., Tsai, C. T., and DeAngelis, R. J., J. Appl. Phys., 60(5), 1784 (1986).Google Scholar
6.Derby, J. J. and Brown, R. A., Journal of Crystal Growth, 74, 605 (1986); 75, 227 (1986).Google Scholar
7.Ettouney, H. M. and Brown, R. A., Journal of Computational Physics 49, 118 (1983).Google Scholar
8.Kobayashi, N. and Iwaki, T., Journal of Crystal Growth 73, 96 (1985)Google Scholar
9.Haasen, P., Z. Phys., 167, 461 (1962)Google Scholar
10.Yonenaga, I. and Sumino, K., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 50, 685 (1978).Google Scholar
11.Tsai, C. T., Ph D dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1985.Google Scholar
12.Kim, Y. K., De Angelis, R. J., Tsai, C. T., and Dillon, O. W., Acta Metall., 35(8), 2091 (1987)Google Scholar
13.Hartzell, R., personal communication, Texas Instruments, Dallas, Texas, 1984.Google Scholar