Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T14:33:29.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of the Nitrogen Bound Excitons in 6H and 3C SiC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. P. Bergman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN
C. I. Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN
O. Kordina
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN
A. Henry
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN
E. Janzén
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN
Get access

Abstract

We have measured the photoluminescence decay time of the bound excitons at the neutral nitrogen donors in the 6H and 3C polytypes of SiC. At 2K the decay times are 8.0 ns, 1.8 ns and 1.5 ns, for the P, R and S bound excitons in 6H SiC. For the nitrogen exciton in 3C, we find a decay time of 160 ns. These values are faster than previously reported for shallow donors in other indirect bandgap materials such as Si or GaP. Each of the observed decay times is found to be independent of the doping level in the sample, is temperature independent at low temperatures but decrease when the bound excitons are thermally ionised. The decay time related to different donor levels in 6H exhibits a strong dependence on the donor binding energy. We suggest that the dominant mechanism responsible for the observed decay time is a phonon-less Auger process. In high-purity 6H samples we have also measured the free exciton decay time at low temperatures to be 12 ns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Suttrop, W., Pensi, G., Choyke, W. J., Stein, R., and Leibenzeder, S., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 3708, (1992).Google Scholar
2) Dean, P. J., Choyke, W. J., and Patrick, L., J. Lumin 15, 299 (1977).Google Scholar
3) Dean, P. J., and Hartman, R. L., Phys. Rev. B. 5, 4911 (1972).Google Scholar
4) Choyke, W. J., Hamilton, D. R., and Patrick, L., Phys. Rev. A. 139, 1262 (1965).Google Scholar
5) Hartman, R. L., and Dean, P. J., Phys. Rev. B. 2, 951 (1970).Google Scholar
6) Kordina, O., Hallin, C., Glass, R. C., Henry, A., and Janzén, E., Proc. Int. Conf. on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials, Washington DC, USA 1-3:th Nov. 1993.Google Scholar
7) Nelson, D.F., Cuthbert, J.D., Dean, P.J., and Thomas, D.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1262 (1966).Google Scholar
8) Schmid, W., Phys. Stat. Sol. 84, 529 (1977).Google Scholar
9) Osbourn, G. C., and Smith, D. L., Phys. Rev. B. 16, 5426 (1977).Google Scholar
10) Gavrilenko, V. I., Postnikov, A. V., Klyui, N. I., and Litovchenko, V. G., Phys. Stat. Sol. 162, 477 (1990).Google Scholar
11) Wheeler, B. E., Solid State Commun. 4, 173 (1966).Google Scholar
12) Park, C. H., Cheong, Byoung-Ho, Lee, Keun-Ho, and Chang, K. J., Phys. Rev. B. 49, 4485 (1994).Google Scholar
13) Dean, P. J., Faulkner, R. A., Kimura, S., and Ilegems, M., Phys. Rev. B 4, 1926 (1971).Google Scholar