Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T19:21:50.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Silicon Substrate Ion Implantation on the Subsequent Microstructure Evolution in Cobalt Silicide Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Z. G. Xiao
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Raleigh, NC
J. W. Honeycutt
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Raleigh, NC
G. A. Rozgonyi
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Raleigh, NC
Get access

Abstract

The influence of amorphization of the Si substrate by Ge+ implantation on the microstructural evolution of CoSi2 thin films has been investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and four-point-probe measurement. While the silicide films formed on unimplanted or recrystallized Si were similar in formation kinetics, microstructure and resistivity, unique features were found for silicide films formed on amorphized Si. The phase transformation to CoSi2 on amorphized Si was considerably accelerated, the silicide grain size was smaller, and the CoSi2/Si interface was much smoother on the amorphized Si. Direct evidence of grain boundary diffusion induced silicide/Si interface roughness was obtained. The origin of the difference in both the microstructure and kinetics on different Si substrates is explained by the latent energy stored in amorphous Si, increasing the silicide nucleation rate. Weak XRD peaks and different texture were found for the CoSi2 formed on amorphized Si. The facts that the dominant diffusing species during CoSi2 formation is Co, and the new phase was developed in an amorphous medium are thought to be responsible for these phenomena.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gurp, G.J. and Lagnereis, C., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 4301 (1975).Google Scholar
2. Lau, S.S., Mayer, J.W., and Tu, K.N., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 4005 (1978).Google Scholar
3. d’Heurle, F.M. and Petersson, C.S., Thin Solid Films, 128, 283 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Appelbaum, A., Knoell, R.V. and Murarka, S.P., J. Appl. Phys. 57, 1880 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Lien, C.D., Nicolet, M.A., and Lau, S.S., Appl. Phys. A 34, 249 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Xiao, Z.G., Rozgonyi, G.A., Canovai, C.A., and Osburn, C.M., see these proceedings.Google Scholar
7. Murarka, S.P., Read, M.H., Doherty, C.J., and Fraser, D.B., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 293 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Elliman, R.G., Williams, J.S., Maher, D.M., and Brown, W.L., MRS Symposia Proc. 51, 319 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Morgan, A.E., Broadbent, E.K., Delfino, M., Coulman, B., and Sadana, D.K., J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 925 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Xiao, Z.G., Jiang, H., Honeycutt, J., Osburn, C.M., McGuire, G., and Rozgonyi, G.A., MRS. Symp. Proc. 181.Google Scholar
11. Chu, W.K., Lau, S.S., Mayer, J.W., Muller, H., and Tu, K.N., Thin Solid Films, 25, 393 (1975).Google Scholar
12. Donovan, E.P., Spaepen, F., Turnbull, D., Poate, J.M. and Jacobson, D.C., J. Appl. Phys. 57, 1795 (1985).Google Scholar