Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T01:45:07.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-Situ Photoexcitation-Induced Suppression of Point Defect Generation in Ion Implanted Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. R. Cho
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC 27695-7916
N. Yarykin
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC 27695-7916
G. A. Rozgonyi
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC 27695-7916
R. A. Zuhr
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN37831
Get access

Abstract

The formation of vacancy-related defects in n-type silicon has been studied immediately after implantation of He, Si, or Ge ions at 85 K using in-situ DLTS. A-center concentrations in He-implanted samples reach a maximum immediately after implantation, whereas, with Si or Ge ion implanted samples they continuously increase during subsequent anneals. It is proposed that defect clusters, which emit vacancies during anneals, are generated in the collision cascades of Si or Ge ions. An illumination-induced suppression of A-center formation is seen immediately after implantation of He ions at 85 K. This effect is also observed with Si or Ge ions, but only after annealing. The suppression of vacancy complex formation via photoexcitation is believed to occur due to an enhanced recombination of defects during ion implantation, and results in reduced number of vacancies remaining in the defect clusters. In p-type silicon, a reduction in K-center formation and an enhanced migration of defects are concurrently observed in the illuminated sample implanted with Si ions. These observations are consistent with a model where the injection of excess carriers modifies the defect charge state and impacts their diffusion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Cho, C. R., Brown, R. A., Kononchuk, O., Yarykin, N., Rozgonyi, G. A., and Zuhr, R., Mat. Res Soc. Symp. Proc. 532, 253 (1998).Google Scholar
[2] Cho, C. R., Yarykin, N., Brown, R. A., Kononchuk, O., Rozgonyi, G. A., and Zuhr, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1263 (1999).Google Scholar
[3] Watkins, G.D., Troxell, J. R. and Chatterjee, A. P., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 46, 16 (1979).Google Scholar
[4] Kimerling, L. C., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 46, 56 (1979).Google Scholar
[5] Erokhin, Y. N., Ravi, J., and Rozgonyi, G. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1656 (1995).Google Scholar
[6] Boldyrev, S. N., Mordkovich, V. N., Omel'yanovskaya, N. M., Feklisova, O. V., and Yarykin, N. A., Semiconductors, 28, 1009 (1994).Google Scholar
[7] Danilin, A. B., Erokhin, Y., and Mordkovich, V. N., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B, 59–60, 985 (1991).Google Scholar
[8] Ravi, J., Erokhin, Y., Christensen, K., Rozgonyi, G. A., Patnaik, B. K., and White, C. W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 373, 475 (1995).Google Scholar
[9] Ravi, J., Erokhin, Y., Rozgonyi, G. A., and White, C. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2158 (1995).Google Scholar
[10] Kimerling, L. C., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 31, 221 (1977).Google Scholar
[11] Svensson, B. G., Jagadish, C., Hallén, A., and Lalita, J., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B, 106, 183 (1995).Google Scholar
[12] Svensson, B. G., Mohadjeri, B., Hallén, A., Svensson, J. H., and Corbett, J. W., Phys. Rev. B 43, 2292 (1991).Google Scholar
[13] Cho, C. R., Yarykin, N., Rozgonyi, G. A., and Zuhr, R., to be presented at the Spring Meeting of the Electrochem. Soc. May (1999).Google Scholar
[14] Ryssel, H. and Glawischning, H., Ion Implantation Techniques, Springer-Verlag, New York, 10, pp. 301 (1982).Google Scholar
[15] Bourgoin, J. C., Corbett, J. W., and Frish, H. L., J. Chem. Phys. 59, 4042 (1973).Google Scholar