Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T21:55:56.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interface Reaction and Atomic Transport During COSi2 Film Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Z. G. Xiao
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Raleigh, NC
J. W. Honeycutt
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Raleigh, NC
G. A. Rozgonyi
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Raleigh, NC
Get access

Abstract

The formation process of COSi2 films grown from Co deposited on a Si single crystal was investigated as a function of very short annealing times by transmission electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction. Information on the interfacial reactions and atomic transport phenomena was obtained from a microstructural analysis of the CoxSiy layers formed. It was demonstrated that Co is the dominant diffusion species during COSi2 formation. Co atoms are generated at the COSi2/COSi2 interface via the reaction 2CoSi=CoSi2+Co and diffuse to the COSi2/Si interface, where they react with Si by Co+2Si=CoSi2. Direct microscopic evidence indicates that diffusivity of Co atoms along a COSi2 grain boundary greatly exceeds that through the COSi2 lattice. The grain boundary diffusion coefficient is estimated to be up to 100 times larger than the lattice diffusion coefficient. On this basis the influence of grain size on COSi2 film formation is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nicolet, M. A. and Lau, S. S., in VLSI Electronics Microstructure Science, Vol. 6, Ed. by Einspruch, N.G. and Larrabee, G. B., 1983, p. 330.Google Scholar
2. van Gurp, G. J. and Lagnereis, C., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 4301 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Lau, S. S., Mayer, J. W. and Tu, K. N., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 4005 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Appelbaum, A., Knoell, R. V. and Murarka, S. P., J. Appl. Phys. 57, 1880 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Lien, C. D., Nicolet, M. A. and Lau, S. S., Appl. Phys. A34, 249 (1984).Google Scholar
6. D'Heurle, F. M. and Peterson, C. S., Thin Solid Films, 128, 283 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Jan, C. H., Lin, J. C. and Chang, Y. A., MRS Symp. Proc. 148, 35 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Gosele, U. and Tu, K. N., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 3252 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. D'Anterroches, C., Surface Sci. 168, 751 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Xiao, Z. G., Honeycutt, J. W. and Rozgonyi, G. A., MRS Symp. Proc. 202, 259 (1991), and J. Materials Research, 7, 269 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Tu, K. N., Ottaviani, G. and Thompson, R. D., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 4406 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Smithells, C. J., Metals Reference Book, 5th ed. 1976.Google Scholar
13. d'Heurle, F. M. and Gas, P., J. Mater. Res. 1, 205 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Gleiter, H. and Chalmers, B., Prog. Mater. Sci., 16, 77 (1972).Google Scholar