Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T06:42:16.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A low temperature, single step, pulsed d.c magnetron sputtering technique for copper indium gallium diselenide photovoltaic absorber layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2013

Sreejith Karthikeyan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN -55414, USA
Kushagra Nagaich
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN -55414, USA
Arthur E Hill
Affiliation:
Materials and Physics Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK
Richard D Pilkington
Affiliation:
Materials and Physics Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK
Stephen A Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN -55414, USA
Get access

Abstract

Pulsed d.c Magnetron Sputtering (PdcMS) has been investigated for the first time to study the deposition of copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) thin films for photovoltaic applications. Pulsing the d.c. in the mid frequency region enhances the ion intensity and enables long term arc-free operation for the deposition of high resistivity materials such as CIGS. It has the potential to produce films with good crystallinity, even at low substrate temperatures. However, the technique has not generally been applied to the absorber layers for photovoltaic applications. The growth of stoichiometric p-type CIGS with the desired electro-optical properties has always been a challenge, particularly over large areas, and has involved multiple steps often including a dangerous selenization process to compensate for selenium vacancies. The films deposited by PdcMS had a nearly ideal composition (Cu0.75In0.88Ga0.12Se2) as deposited at substrate temperatures ranging from no intentional heating to 400 °C. The films were found to be very dense and pin-hole free. The stoichiometry was independent of heating during the deposition, but the grain size increased with substrate temperature, reaching about ∼ 150 nm at 400 °C. Hot probe analysis showed that the layers were p-type. The physical, structural and optical properties of these films were analyzed using SEM, EDX, XRD, and UV-VIS-NIR spectroscopy. The material characteristics suggest that these films can be used for solar cell applications. This novel ion enhanced single step low temperature deposition technique may have a critical role in flexible and tandem solar cell applications compared to other conventional techniques which require higher temperatures.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jackson, P., Hariskos, D., Lotter, E., Paetel, S., Wuerz, R., Menner, R., Wischmann, W., and Powalla, M., Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, doi: 10.1002/pip.1078 (2011).Google Scholar
Deok Kim, S., Kim, H. J., Hoon Yoon, K., and Song, J., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 62, 357 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Kou, X. L., Cai, Y. A., Liu, W., Yu, T., Pang, J. B., Li, C. J., and Sun, Y., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25, 055007 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. J., Hisek, J., Zhou, Y., Pilkington, R. D., and Arnell, R. D., Surface Engineering 20, 157 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. J. and Arnell, R. D., Vacuum 56, 159 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, J. W., Bäcker, H., Kelly, P. J., and Arnell, R. D., Surf. Coat. Technol. 135, 221 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karthikeyan, S., Hill, A. E., Pilkington, R. D., Cowpe, J. S., Hisek, J., and Bagnall, D. M., Thin Solid Films 519, 3107 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karthikeyan, S., Hill, A. E., Cowpe, J. S., and Pilkington, R. D., Vacuum 85, 634 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, W., Cabrera, N., and Frank, F., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 299 (1951).Google Scholar
Bradley, J. W., Bäcker, H., Aranda-Gonzalvo, Y., Kelly, P. J., and Arnell, R. D., Plasma Sources Science and Technology 11, 165 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., He, Q., Jiang, W.-L., Liu, F.-F., Li, C.-J., and Sun, Y., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93, 114 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. S., Yang, J. C., Chan, Y. C., Yang, L. C., and Huang, W., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93, 1351 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbe, A., Johnson, P., Jackson, S., Weiss, R., Avachat, U., Welsh, A., and Ehiasarian, A., in Photovoltaic Materials and Manufacturing Issues II - Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings (Materials Research Society, 2009), Vol. 1210, p. 179.Google Scholar
Neumann, H., Jones, P. A., Sobotta, H., Hörig, W., Tomlinson, R. D., and Yakushev, M. V., Cryst. Res. Technol. 31, 63 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar