Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T16:39:08.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Secondary Defect Formation And Gettering in Mev Self-Implanted Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R. A. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7916
O. Kononchuk
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7916
Z. Radzimski
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7916
G. A. Rozgonyi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7916
F. Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Micron Technology, Inc., Boise ID 83707
Get access

Abstract

Secondary defect and impurity distributions in MeV self-implanted Czochralski (Cz) and float-zone (FZ) silicon have been investigated by transmission electron microscopy, optical microscopy with preferential chemical etching, and secondary ion mass spectroscopy. We found that the ion fluence and the oxygen content of the implanted wafers affect the number and depth distribution of extended defects remaining after annealing. Intrinsic oxygen also redistributes during annealing of Cz wafers, producing two regions of relatively high oxygen concentration: one at extended defects near the ion projected range, and another, shallower region, which correlates with the distribution of vacancy-type defects. Both of these regions are also able to getter metallic impurities, depending on the implantation and annealing conditions. These defect issues may adversely affect the quality of the near surface device region, and must be controlled for successful gettering by ion implantation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Borland, J. O. and Koelsch, R., Solid State Technology 36, 28 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Tsukamoto, K., Komori, S., Kuroi, T. and Akasaka, Y. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 59/60, 584591 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Brown, R. A., Kononchuk, O., Radzimski, Z., Rozgonyi, G. A. and Gonzalez, F., Nucl. Instr. and Meth., in press (1996).Google Scholar
4. Kononchuk, O., Brown, R. A., Radzimski, Z., Rozgonyi, G. A. and Gonzalez, F., Appl. Phys. Lett., in press (1996).Google Scholar
5. Brown, R. A., Kononchuk, O., Bondarenko, I., Radzimski, Z., Rozgonyi, G. A. and Gonzalez, F., submitted to The Journal of the Electrochemical Society (1996).Google Scholar
6. Biersack, J. P. and Haggmark, L. G., Nucl. Instr. Meth. 174, 257269 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Tamura, M., Mat. Sci. Rep. 6(4/5), (1991).Google Scholar
8. Lorenz, E., Gyulai, J., Frey, L., Ryssel, H. and Khanh, N. Q., J. Mater. Res. 6, 16951700 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Erofeev, V. N. and Nikitenko, V. I., Soy. Phys. - Solid State 13, 116 (1971).Google Scholar
10. Larsen, K. Kyllesbech, Pritivera, V., Coffa, S., Priolo, F., Campisano, S. U., and Camera, A., Physical Review Letters 76, 14931496 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Cheng, J. Y., Eaglesham, D. J., Jacobson, D. C., Stolk, P. A., Benton, J. L. and Poate, J. M., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 21052112 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Tamura, M., in Defect Control in Semiconductors, K., Sumino, Editor, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V., (1990).Google Scholar
13. Agarwal, A., Christensen, K., Maher, D.M., Rozgonyi, G.A. and Gonzalez, F., Appl. Phys. Lett., in press (1996).Google Scholar
14. Brown, R. A., Kononchuk, O., Goldberg, R. D., Rozgonyi, G. A. and Gonzalez, F., to be published.Google Scholar