Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T03:56:26.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Silicon and Silicon Dioxide Thermal Bonding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Robert D. Black
Affiliation:
General Electric Research and Development, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
Ernest L. Hall
Affiliation:
General Electric Research and Development, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
Nathan Lewis
Affiliation:
General Electric Research and Development, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
Robert S. Gilmore
Affiliation:
General Electric Research and Development, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
Steven D. Arthur
Affiliation:
General Electric Research and Development, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
Robert D. Lillquist
Affiliation:
General Electric Research and Development, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
Get access

Abstract

The quality of the bond produced after mating oxidized and/or unoxidized silicon wafers has been studied using acoustic microscopy, infrared transmission thermographs, and transmission electron microscopy. The acoustic microscopy revealed that a significant number of unbonded regions (gaps) remain at the bond interface after bonding in oxygen, nitrogen, or high vacuum, and then annealing. These gaps could be virtually eliminated by a subsequent hyperbaric annealing step. The thermal imaging was found to have insufficient resolution to give a detailed picture of the bond quality. Transmission electron microscopy showed that an excellent bond could be produced when bonding clean silicon wafers, with only very small oxide or void bubbles present at the interface. Bonding two oxidized wafers resulted in a buried oxide layer with no detectable bond line. Mating an oxidized wafer to an unoxidized wafer produced a bonded silicon/oxide interface which was nearly indistiguishable from the wafer/thermal oxide interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lasky, J. B., Stiffler, S. R., White, F. R., and Abernathy, J. R., Intern. Elec. Dev. Meeting (IEDM), 684 (1985).Google Scholar
2 Shimbo, M., Furukawa, K., Fukuda, K., and Tanzawa, K., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 2987 (1986).Google Scholar
3 Kern, W. and Puotinen, D.A., RCA Review 31, 187 (1970).Google Scholar
4 Gilmore, R. S., Tarn, K. C., and Howard, D. R., GE Technical Information Service Report 86CRD015, Schenectady, NY (1986).Google Scholar
5 Ataler, A., IEEE Trans, on Sonics and Acoustics SU-32, 164 (1985).Google Scholar
6 Jipson, V. B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 35, 385 (1979).Google Scholar
7 Miller, A. J. in Acoustic Imaging. Vol. 12. Ash and Hill, eds. (Plenum Press, London, 1982) p. 67.Google Scholar
8 Faigon, A. and Shappir, J., IEDM, 161 (1984).Google Scholar
9 Her, R. K., The Chemistry of Silica. (Wiley, NY, 1979).Google Scholar