Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T05:43:56.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Titania-German Nanocomposites for Quantum Dot Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Amita Goyal ,
Sukti Hazra  and
S. Ismat Shah
Amita Goyal
Affiliation:
goamita@rediffmail.com, University of Delaware, Materials Science and Physics, 201 Dupont Hall, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States, 302-831-1618, 302-831-4545
Sukti Hazra
Affiliation:
sukti@yahoo.com, University of Delaware, Center for Composite Materials, Newark, DE, 19716, United States
S. Ismat Shah
Affiliation:
ismat@udel.edu, University of Delaware, Materials Sceince and Engineering, 201 Dupont Hall, Newark, DE, 19716, United States
Get access

Abstract

Several new photovoltaic semiconductor materials and technologies have been developed due to the increasing need for renewable energy sources. Quantum dot (QD) based solar cell is potentially one of the best contenders. We have developed a thermodynamically stable nanocomposite (stable up to 900°C) titania-germanium (TiO2-Ge) which shows promise as the active layer for QD solar cells. In TiO2-Ge nanocomposites Ge nanodots are distributed in a TiO2 matrix. Due to the 3-D quantum confinement effect, tailoring of the optoelectronic properties is relatively easily done by simply varying the Ge nanodots size. Ge is particularly advantageous since its Bohr radius is relatively large, 25 nm. In this paper results of the variation of the optoelectronic properties of TiO2-Ge nanocomposites as a function of the nanostructure parameters are presented. TiO2-Ge nanocomposite thin films were synthesized using RF magnetron sputtering. The structural studies (by XRD, HRTEM) established the fact that the Ge concentration in the composite target governs the size of the Ge nanodots whereas RF sputtering power controls the density of Ge nanodots in the nanocomposite films. The optical spectroscopic studies showed that the variation of the size of Ge nanodots in the TiO2-Ge films shifts the absorption edge from ∼ 0.66 eV (infrared) to ∼ 2.3 eV (blue-green). Similarly, dark conductivity also varies in a wide range of 10−7 - 10−2 Scm−1 by altering the concentration as well as the structural phase (amorphous or crystalline) of Ge.

Keywords

nanostructurephotovoltaicthin film
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 974: Symposium CC – Solar Energy Conversion , 2006 , 0974-CC05-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1) Green, Martin A, High efficiency silicon solar cells, Solar cells, 23, 3–4,273–274, (1988).Google Scholar
2) Birkmire, Robert W. and Eser, Erten, Annual Review of Materials Science, 27,625–653, (1997).10.1146/annurev.matsci.27.1.625Google Scholar
3) O' Regan, B & Gratzel, M. Nature 353, 737–740 (1991).Google Scholar
4) Green, Martin A., Emery, Keith, King, David L., Hisikawa, Yoshihiro and Warta, Wilhelm. Prog. Photovolt Res. Appl. 14, 45 (2006).10.1002/pip.686Google Scholar
5) Burns, Andrew, Hayes, G., Li, W., Hirvonen, J., Demaree, J. Derek, Shah, S. Ismat, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 111, 150 (2004).Google Scholar
6) Deb, Satyen K., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 88, 1 (2005).Google Scholar
7) Wang, Peng, Zakeeruddin, Shaik M., Moser, Jacques, Nazeeruddin, Mohammad K., Sekiguchi, Takashi and Gratzel, Michael, Nature Materials, 2, 403(2003).Google Scholar
8) Nazeerudin, Mohammad K., Censo, Davide Di, Humphry-Baker, Robin, and Gratzel, Michael, Adv. Funct. Mater., 16, 189–194(2006).10.1002/adfm.200500309Google Scholar
9) Thelakkat, M., Schmitz, C., and Schmidt, Hans –Werner, Adv. Mater. 14, 577 (2002).10.1002/1521-4095(20020418)14:8<577::AID-ADMA577>3.0.CO;2-S3.0.CO;2-S>Google Scholar
10) Brus, L.E., J. Chem. Phys. 79, 5566 (1983).10.1063/1.445676Google Scholar
11) Brus, L.E., J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4403 (1984).10.1063/1.447218Google Scholar
12) Brus, L.E., IEEE J. Quantum Electron 22,1909 (1986).10.1109/JQE.1986.1073184Google Scholar
13) Ray, S.K. and Das, K., Opt. Mater. 27, 948 (2005).10.1016/j.optmat.2004.08.041Google Scholar
14) Maeda, Yoshihito, Tsukamoto, Nobuo, Yazawa, Yoshiaki, Kanemitsu, Yoshikiko and Masumoto, Yasuaki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3168 (1991).Google Scholar
15) Next Generation Photovoltaics, edited by Antonio Marti, Antonio Luque; A.J. Nozik Chapter 9, pp-196. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia.Google Scholar
16) Nozik, A.J., Physica E 14,115 (2002).10.1016/S1386-9477(02)00374-0Google Scholar
17) Shah, S. Ismat, Greene, J.E., Ables, L.L., Yao, Qi. and Raccah, P.M., J. of Crystal Growth 83, 3 (1987).10.1016/0022-0248(87)90495-7Google Scholar