Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T23:00:56.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of the light-limited growth of the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria Anabaena and Aphanizomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1998

W. T. (PIM) DE NOBEL
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, ARISE, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
HANS C. P. MATTHIJS
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, ARISE, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
ERIC VON ELERT
Affiliation:
Limnologisches Institut, Universität Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
LUUC R. MUR
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, ARISE, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The effect of simultaneous N2 fixation and light limitation on the growth of two strains of Anabaena sp. Bory de St. Vincent and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (L.) Ralfs was investigated using continuous cultures. Under severely light-limited conditions, Aphanizomenon showed a broader absorption spectrum (due to the presence of phycoerythrin), a higher maximum efficiency of photosynthesis, a higher steady-state N2 fixation activity and a higher growth affinity for light than did Anabaena. On the other hand, under light saturation, Anabaena showed a higher maximum rate of O2 production and a higher maximum specific growth rate than Aphanizomenon. These monoculture results characterize Anabaena and Aphanizomenon, in relative terms, as a ‘sun’ and a ‘shade’ species respectively, and are in accordance with field observations. The difference between the two species in their acclimatory response is discussed in terms of a species-specific alteration of the PSI[ratio ]PSII stoichiometry. Besides the species-specific modulation of the accessory pigments, such an acclimation would provide a biochemical basis for the observed physiological differences. The monoculture results were used to differentiate the niches of the two species and suggested that Aphanizomenon would competitively displace Anabaena under N2-fixing, light-limited conditions. However, when both species were grown together, Anabaena became dominant and seemed to be the superior competitor for light. In order to explain this finding, the possible effects of release of allelopathic compounds, or dynamic aspects of light supply, are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)