^{page 161 note 1} The Theology of the New Testament, 1, 31, 46, 82.Google Scholar

^{page 162 note 1} Cf. Bultmann, R., op. cit. 1, 27, 125, etc.Google Scholar

^{page 162 note 2} The Atonement in New Testament Teaching, p. 66.Google Scholar

^{page 163 note 1} Cf. also R. Bultmann, The Theology of the New Testament, 1, 50.Google Scholar

^{page 163 note 2} Professor Cullmann also writes: ‘The Christology of the apostle Peter, if we may dare to use this expression, was quite probably dominated by the concept of the ebed Yahweh. He also affirms that the narrative concerning the Ethiopian eunuch is ‘the chief evidence that Jesus was explicitly identified with this ebed Yahweh in the first century, and that the vivid memory was clearly preserved that Jesus himself so understood his divine mission’. Cf. Peter, Disciple, Apostle, Martyr, Eng. Trans., p. 66f. Cf. also Acts xiii. 47.Google Scholar

^{page 164 note 1} Das Lukasevangelium ², p. 214.Google Scholar

^{page 164 note 2} Swete, H. B., Studies in the Teaching of our Lord, p. 111.Google Scholar

^{page 165 note 1} Cf. Percy, E., Die Botsehaft Jesu, p. 240.Google Scholar

^{page 165 note 2} Cf. the article mentioned above by J. Jeremias; also Manson, W., Jesus the Messiah, pp. 98–101, 171–4;Google ScholarDavies, W. D., Paul and Rabbinic Judaism, p. 279f.;Google ScholarBowman, J., The Expository Times, LIX, 287f.;Google ScholarBlack, M., The Expository Times, LX, 14f;Google Scholar and especially by Hegermann, H., Jesaja 53 in Hexapla, Targum und Peschitta (1954).Google Scholar

^{page 165 note 3} Cf. Manson, T. W., The Servant-Messiah.Google Scholar

^{page 165 note 4} Op. cit. p. 66.Google Scholar

^{page 166 note 1} Cf. Dodd, C. H., The Journal of Roman Studies, XXXVI, 47–54.Google Scholar