Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T18:49:35.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rights and Citizenship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

J. Roland Pennock
J. Roland Pennock*
Affiliation:
Swarthmore College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This discussion of rights and citizenship is part of a series falling under the general topic “Ethical Issues and Citizenship Education.” Although it contains little directly dealing with how to go about the education of citizens, it does embody material that would be desirable for citizens to know and to understand. Citizenship as well as rights will be discussed in the pages that follow, but the bulk of this particular contribution to the series will deal with rights. (Specifically sections 3-7 deal solely with rights.) The relation between the two is greater than might otherwise appear to the casual reader, for it is as citizens that we claim our most important rights, our rights against the state. Our legal rights have derived from our citizenship. As citizens we enjoy the right to have our rights enforced — as a matter of right, not just as a privilege that could be legitmately taken away from us at the whim of some arbitrary ruler.

Type
Research Article
Information
News for Teachers of Political Science , Volume 31 , Fall 1981 , pp. 12 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This essay was written in conjuction with the project on “Ethical Issues: Citizenship and Political Education”. supported by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities to the American Political Science Association. This essay reflects the lessons and discussions of the faculty seminar directed by Professor Pennock.

*

This essay has profited greatly from the comments of the following persons who have read an earlier version of it: Charles R. Beitz, Richard B. Brandt, John W. Chapman, Bette Novit Evans, Jonathon F. Galloway, Emily R. Gill, Martin Golding, Sheilah Mann (Director of the Project for which this was prepared), Charles A. Miller, Peter Riesenberg, and David G. Smith. To each of them I am greatly indebted.

References

Aquinas, Thomas.Selected Political Writings, ed. d'Entreves. Oxford: Blackwell, 1948. Aristotle. PoliticsGoogle Scholar
Baier, Kurt. “When Does the Right to Life Begin?”, Pennock and Chapman, eds., Human Rights. NOMOS XXIII.Google Scholar
Becker, Lawrence.Property Rights. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy.AFraament on Government, ed. Harrison, . Oxford: Blackwell. 1948.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy.A, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring. New York, NY: Russell & Russell, 1962.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William.Commentaries on the Laws of England. Philadelphia, PA, 1860.Google Scholar
Bracton on the Laws and Customs of England. transl. Samuel E., Thorne. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Braybrooke, David. Three Tests for Democracy: Personal Rights, Human Welfare, Collective Preference. New York, NY: Random House, 1968.Google Scholar
Carlyle, R.W. and A.J. A History of Medieval Political Thought in the West. New York, NY: Barnes & Noble, 1928.Google Scholar
Chafee, Zechariah Jr., ed. Documents on Fundamental Human Rights. New York, NY: Atheneum, 1963.Google Scholar
Coker, Francis W., ed. Readings in Political Philosophy. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1938.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. “Federalism in the Democratic Process,” Pennock & Chapman, eds. Liberal Democracy, NOMOS XXV. Forthcoming, 1982.Google Scholar
Dargo, George, , Rootss of the Republic. New York, NY: Praeger, 1964.Google Scholar
De Bonald, Marquis.Essay on the Natural Laws of the Social Order. Paris, 1827.Google Scholar
De Maistre, Joseph.Essay on the Source of Political Constitutions. Paris, 1814.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter F. “The Job as Property Right,” The Wall Street Journal, March 3, 1980.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald.Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel.Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. “Voluntary Euthanasia and the Right to Life,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1977-78.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.The Morality of Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Gewirth, Alan.Reason and Morality. Chicago, III.: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Glazer, Nathan. “Individual Rights Against Group Rights,” Kamenka & Tay, eds. Human Rights.Google Scholar
Golding, Martin P. “Justice and Riahts: A Study in Relationship.” Earl E., Shelp, ed. Justice and Health Care. Boston, Mass.: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1981.Google Scholar
Gough, J.W.Locke's Political Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Hall, Jerome, ed. Readings in Jurisprudence. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1938.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart, ed. Public and Private Morality. Cambridge University Press, 1978.10.1017/CBO9780511625329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. “Justice and Equality.” Arthur, John and Shaw, William H., eds. Justice and Economic Distribution. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A.The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. “Are There Any Natural Rights?” Philosophical Review, 64, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A.“Between Utility and Rights.”Columbia Law Review, 79, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harz, Louis.The Liberal Tradition in America. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, 1955.Google Scholar
Hocking, William E.Present Status of the Philosophy of Law and Rights. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley N. “Fundamental Legal Conceptions.” Yale Law Journal, 23, 1913.10.2307/785533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. Walter.The Law and Legal Theory of the Greeks. Aalen: Scienta Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar
Kamenka, Eugene and Alice Erh-Soon, Tay, eds. Human Rights. London: Arnold, 1978.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel.Principles of Political Right, transl. Hastie. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1891.Google Scholar
Kleinig, John. “Human Rights, Legal Rights, and Social Change,” in Kamenka & Tay, Human Rights, chap. 3.Google Scholar
Lamont, W.D.In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. XXIV, 1950.Google Scholar
Locke, John.Second Treatise of Civil Government, ed. Laslett. Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. “Human Rights and the General Welfare,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 1977.Google Scholar
Machan, Tibor.Human Rights and Human Liberties. Chicago, III.: Nelson-Hall, 1975.Google Scholar
Mcllwain, Charles Howard.The Growth of Political Thought in the West. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1932.Google Scholar
A.I., MeldenRights and Persons. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. “On Liberty,” in Utilitarianism, Liberty, and Representative Government. New York, NY: Dutton, 1926.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart., “On Representative Government,” ibid.Google Scholar
Minogue, Kenneth. “Natural Rights, Ideology and the Game of Life,” in Kamenka and Tay, Human Rights.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de.The Spirit of the Laws, trans. Nugent. New York, NY: Hafner, 1949.Google Scholar
Narveson, Jan.Morality and Utility. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Nicholas, of Cusa. De Concordatia Catholica , in Coker, Readings in Political Philosophy.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert.Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Paine, Tom.The Selected Work of Tom Paine, ed. Fast. New York, NY: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce, 1945.Google Scholar
Pennock, J. Roland and John W., Chapman, eds. Human Rights, NOMOS XXIII. New York, NY: New York University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Pennock, J. Roland.,Liberal Democracy, NOMOS XXIV. New York, NY: New York University Press , forthcoming, 1982.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, John, in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. XXIV, 1950. Plato. Crito.Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A.The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Pranger, Robert J.The Eclipse of Citizenship. New York, NY: Holt, 1968.Google Scholar
Rawls, John.A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, John., “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesenberg, Peter. “Citizenship at Law in Late Medieval Italy,” Viator, Medieval and Renaissance Studies 5 (1974).Google Scholar
Riesenberg, Peter.“Citizenship and Roman Law in Fourteenth Century Italian Society,” Herlihy, David and others, eds., Economy, Society, and Government in Medieval Italy Kent: Kent State University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Ritchie, David G.Natural Rights. London: Allen & Unwin, 1924.Google Scholar
Ross, Alf.On Law and Justice. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. XXIV, 1950.Google Scholar
Rothbard, Murray.For a New Liberty. New York, N.Y.: Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. “Rights, Goals, and Fairness,” Hampshire, ed., Public and Private Morality.Google Scholar
Shue, Henry.Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Shue, Henry., “Torture,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(1977-78).Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John.Moral Principles and Moral Obligation . Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames.Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. London, 1873.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo.Natural Rights and History. Chicago, III.: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Suarez, Francisco.De Legibus ac Deo Legislatore, Coimbra, 1619, selection from Hall's Readings.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F.The Democratic Citizen. Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence.American Constitutional Law. Mineola, NY: Foundation Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard.Natural Rights Theories, Their Origin and Developement. Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James.A Disclosure on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. “The Distribution of Membership,” Brown, Peter and Shue, Henry, eds., Boundaries: National Autonomy and Its Limits. Totowah, NJ: Roman and Littlefield, forthcoming, 1981.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael.Obligations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick G. “Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem,” Pennock and Chapman, eds., Liberal Democracy, NOMOS XXV. New York, NY: New York University Press, forthcoming, 1982.Google Scholar
Wills, Garry.Inventing America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1978.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, A.S.P.Puritanism and Liberty. Chicago, III.: University of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar