Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T23:55:20.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction as Material: The techno-somatic dimension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Garth Paine
Garth Paine*
Affiliation:
School of Arts, Media + Engineering, Arizona State University, PO Box 875802, Tempe AZ, 85287-5802, USA
*
Email: Garth.Paine@asu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper proposes an alternative approach to the analysis and design of interaction in real-time performance systems. It draws on the idea that the connection between the human engagement with the interface itself (digital or analogue) and the resultant rich media output forms a proposed experiential dimension containing both technical and somatic considerations. The proposed dimension is characterised by its materiality and is referred to by the author as the techno-somatic dimension. The author proposes that the materiality of the techno-somatic dimension may be usefully examined as part of a re-consideration of the nature of interaction in systems where the input characteristics of the performer’s actions, the musician’s gesture, the dancer’s movements and so on are analysed and also drive the rich media content of the work in real time. The author will suggest that such a techno-somatic dimension exists in all human engagement with technologies, analogue or digital. Furthermore, the author is proposing that design and analysis efforts for new interactive systems should focus on the techno-somatic dimension; that, if this dimension is designed with care to produce a detailed and nuanced experience for the user, design specifications for the interface will automatically result; and that such an interface will produce the somatic and functional characteristics to produce the desired materiality and actional intentionality. For the purposes of this discussion, the author will focus principally on musical interfaces.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 20 , Issue 1: Special issue: Organised Sound Celebrates 20 Years , April 2015 , pp. 82 - 89
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birringer, Johannes H. 1999. Contemporary Performance/Technology. Theatre Journal 51(4): 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadhurst, Susan. 2007. Digital Practices: Aesthetic and Neuroesthetic Approaches to Performance and Technology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. 2008. Everything but the Kitchen SynC… Resonate: Magazine of the Australian Music Centre, Sydney, www.resonatemagazine.com.au/article/everything-but-the-kitchen-syn-c.html.Google Scholar
Godlovitch, Stanley. 1998. Musical Performance: A Philosophical Study. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ihde, Don. 2002. Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ihde, Don. 2010. Embodied Technics. Copenhagen: Automatic Press/VIP.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Paine, Garth. 2002. Interactivity: Where to From Here? Organised Sound 7(3): 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, Garth. 2007. Playing and Hearing Sonic Environments. In Ros Bandt, Michelle Duffy and Dolly MacKinnon (eds.) Hearing Places: Sound, Place, Time and Culture. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Paine, Garth. 2008. Gesture and Morphology in Laptop Music Performance. In Roger T. Dean (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Computer Music and Digital Sound Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paine, Garth. 2009. Towards Unified Design Guidelines for New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Organised Sound 14(2): 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, Garth and Jon, Drummond. 2009. Developing an Ontology of New Interfaces for Realtime Electronic Music Performance. Electronic Music Studies (EMS 09).Google Scholar
Paine, Garth, Stevenson, Ian and Pearce, Angela. 2007. The Thummer Mapping Project (Thump). International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME07): 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, R. 1993. Interactive Music Systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. 2000. Performing Live: Aesthetic Alternatives for the Ends of Art. New York: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, D. 1986. Spectro-Morphology and Structuring Processes. In S. Emmerson (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wishart, Trevor. 1996. On Sonic Art. Philadelphia, PA: Harwood.CrossRefGoogle Scholar