Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-04T14:34:02.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bushmeat and Livelihoods: Wildlife Management and Poverty Reduction edited by Glyn Davies and David Brown (2007), ix + 274 pp., Blackwell Publishing, Malden, USA. ISBN 9781405167796 (pbk), GBP 39.99.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2009

Kent Redford*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, USA. E-mail kredford@wcs.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Publications
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2009

Two of the great moral struggles of this century are conservation and poverty alleviation. Though both struggles have a history reaching back more than 100 years, it is only in the last decade or so that these histories have become directly intertwined. This intersection has generated many claims about the potential for underlying harmony between the two, with many groups proclaiming the power of harnessing conservation for poverty alleviation or achieving conservation by eliminating poverty.

Despite the rhetoric, the evidence is scant for these claims of harmony between conservation and poverty alleviation. There have been a few places, in fact, where claims have been made that these two are in opposition. Nowhere has this disagreement been more marked than in the arena of bushmeat use and poverty alleviation. On the one side are those who have stated that the harvest of wild animals for meat is a key component in alleviating rural poverty while others have argued that almost any harvest is unsustainable and therefore a threat to the conservation of animal species. These arguments have played out most forcefully with large mammalian species in the tropical forest countries of Africa, and have often involved those working in Central Africa arguing against bushmeat use and those working in West Africa arguing for use.

Bushmeat and Livelihoods is a book designed to address exactly this dynamic, concentrating on contributions in these two regions of Africa. The volume is the result of an international conference held at the Zoological Society of London in 2004 that brought together conservationists and development practitioners interested in addressing the growing interest in the bushmeat trade as a potential threat to wildlife conservation in the tropics at the same time that it is considered to be an important part of livelihood strategies of the rural poor. The volume is designed to integrate the two streams of research to be able to recommend ways forward for both policy makers and practitioners that are sensitive to both socio-economic and biological perspectives. The tropical African experience is placed in context with limited contributions from Latin America and Asia.

Food from wild animals is a difficult resource to study. It is a ‘fugitive resource’ with the owner only exerting ownership after the animal is killed. It is often, although not always, the food of poor people. The trade is almost always informal and of uncertain legal status. Finally, consumption of bushmeat is often regarded as a sign of so-called underdevelopment. All of these factors make study of the trade difficult and statistics unavailable or unreliable. For this reason, the richness of the contributions of this volume are welcome.

The volume consists of 15 chapters divided into four parts. The first, and longest, section addresses bushmeat from the market and household perspective. Six case studies look at hunting, trapping, markets, and livelihoods in Sierra Leone, Ghana, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Zambia, and across tropical Africa. The second section examines the institutional context, with case studies from Namibia and Northern Congo and two thematic chapters on institutional and livelihood perspectives. The third section looks at extra sectoral influences and models, with contributions from Zambia and Canada, an examination of the role of bushmeat in poverty reduction strategy papers, and a comparison between commercialization of non-timber forest products and commercialization of bushmeat. Finally, there is a section with a single chapter looking at the situation in tropical Asia.

Reading the chapters provides many interesting details and make clear how complicated and variable are the relationships between harvesting of wild animals and their use in livelihoods—and how this can vary by political, social, and ecological contexts. Examples of this include the importance of the agricultural matrix for supplying game in some settings, the vital relationship between fish consumption and wild mammal consumption, the biases that just sampling markets can provide, the fact that the harvest is in some cases vital for food, and in others for income, and the difference between bushmeat as a luxury in some settings and as a starvation food in others.

As someone who has been an interested bystander over the last decades, I found this book both useful and frustrating. The editors have assembled many of the best people who have been working on the question for the last decade and the chapters provide a richness of information and perspective. However, there has been a great deal published on the issues relevant to both harvest of wild animals and alleviating of poverty in recent years and this volume cannot, and does not, attempt to educate the reader on many of the wider issues. The usual malady of edited volumes afflicts this book, with some chapters specific to the point of narrowness and others overarching to the point of dizziness. Additionally, the non-African contributions sit uncomfortably with the rest of the chapters.

The introduction by the editors, and the short pieces that begin each section provide valuable context to the contributions. However, there is no overall synthesis that would allow the reader to understand how the set of rich case material and analysis can, in fact, integrate the perspectives of both development and conservation—as laid out by the editors as the purpose of the book. A final, synthetic chapter would have been welcome.