Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T18:34:21.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1. Theory, laboratory behavior, and field orientations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Michael LaBarbera
Michael LaBarbera*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

(1) Hydrodynamic principles and experiments with empty shells predict that pressure distributions around brachiopod shells generated by ambient currents should, depending on the orientation of the shell relative to the current, either augment or oppose the ciliary-driven flow of water through the lophophore. For living articulate brachiopods with plectolophes or spirolophes, orientations where the anterior-posterior axis of the shell is parallel to the current direction should result in pressure distributions which oppose active pumping. This effect should be strongest when the excurrent region of the shell faces into the current. Orientations where the anterior-posterior axis is perpendicular to the current direction should result in pressure distributions which act in concert with active pumping, most strongly when one of the incurrent regions is directed into the current. These effects are independent of specific shell shape.

(2) Laqueus californianus and Terebratulina unguicula actively reorient to currents in the laboratory, preferring orientations where the anterior-posterior axis of the shell is perpendicular to the current and the right-left axis is parallel to the current. Both species may traverse an arc as great as 120° to achieve their final orientation. Hemithyris psittacea also will actively reorient to currents, moving towards orientations where the anterior-posterior axis is perpendicular to the current. The maximum rotation observed for H. psittacea was 45°. Terebratalia transversa never reoriented in the laboratory.

(3) Using epifaunal hydroid colonies as indicators of current direction, both Hemithyris psittacea and Terebratalia transversa are oriented in nature with the anterior-posterior axis of the shell perpendicular to the prevailing currents. While scuba diving, I confirmed this orientation phenomenon for T. transversa by direct measurement of the orientation of the brachiopods relative to prevailing currents.

(4) Larval Terebratalia transversa avoid areas with current speeds greater than about 0.2 cm/s during metamorphosis and show no orientation to the ambient currents immediately after metamorphosis. Post-metamorphic T. transversa can actively reorient on the pedicle. The orientation observed in adults is probably achieved by active reorientation to local currents of post-zygolophe juveniles.

(5) Threshold current speeds for reorientation in Laqueus californianus and Terebratulina unguicula are low and approximately equal to the excurrent pumping speeds of each species; dynamic pressure rather than viscous entrainment is probably the relevant factor determining reorientation behavior.

Type
Brachiopod orientation to water movement
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , Summer 1977 , pp. 270 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Atkins, D. 1959. The growth stages of the lophophore and loop of the brachiopod Terebratalia transversa (Sowerby). J. Morph. 105:401–426.Google Scholar
Barling, L. A. 1975. A preliminary study of the orientation and growth of the bay scallop, Argopecten irradians concentricus (Say) in water currents of various speeds. M.S. thesis; Duke Univ., Durham, N.C.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. and Grant, R. E. 1976. Permian brachiopods of West Texas, IV. (Part 2—plates). Smithsonian Contrib. to Paleobiol. No. 21. Smithson. Inst. Press; Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. F., Sanders, H. L., Hessler, R. R., Rowe, G. T. and McLellan, T. 1975. Pattern and zonation: A study of the bathyal megafauna using the research submersible Alvin. Deep-Sea Res. 22:457–481.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R. G. 1967. An investigation of the movement of the scallop, Pecten maximus. Helgolander wiss. Meeresunters. 15:523–533.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, C. B. 1966. The Biology of Suspension Feeding. 357 pp. Pergammon Press; New York.Google Scholar
Koehl, M. A. R.In press. Mechanical design in sea anemones. In: Mackie, G. O., ed. Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior. Plenum Press; New York.Google Scholar
Kozloff, E. N. 1974. Keys to the Marine Invertebrates of Puget Sound, the San Juan Archipelago, and Adjacent Regions. 226 pp. Univ. of Wash. Press; Seattle, Wash.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M.In prep. Brachiopod orientation to water movement. II. Cost of orientation and functional morphology.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M. and Vogel, S. 1976. An inexpensive thermistor flowmeter for aquatic biology. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21:750–756.Google Scholar
Long, J. A. 1964. The embryology of three species representing three superfamilies of articulate Brachiopoda. Ph.D. dissertation; Univ. of Wash., Seattle, Wash.Google Scholar
Nobel, J. P. A., Logan, A., and Webb, G. R. 1976. The recent Terebratulina community in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Lethaia. 9:1–17.Google Scholar
Prandtl, L. and Teitjens, O. G. 1934. Applied Hydro- and Aeromechanics. 311 pp. Dover Publ., Inc.; New York.Google Scholar
Riedl, R. 1966. Biologie der Merreshölen. 636 pp. Parey; Hamburg.Google Scholar
Riedl, R. 1971. Water movement (Animals). In: Kinne, O., ed. Marine Ecology. Vol. 1(2). 1244 pp. Wiley—Interscience; New York.Google Scholar
Rouse, H. 1938. Fluid Mechanics for Hydraulic Engineers. 422 pp. Dover Publ., Inc.; New York.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1962. Filter feeding mechanisms in some brachiopods from New Zealand. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool). 44:592–615.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1965. Ecology and paleoecology. In: Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part H, vol. 1, Brachiopoda. 521 pp. Geol. Soc. Am.; New York.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1970. Living and Fossil Brachiopods. 199 pp. Hutchinson Univ. Library; London.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1969. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 776 pp. W. H. Freeman and Co.; San Francisco.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1975. Adaptive themes in the evolution of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). In: Stehli, F. G. and Wetherill, G. W., eds. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Vol. 3. 466 pp. Annu. Rev., Inc.; Palo Alto, Ca.Google Scholar
Svoboda, A. 1970. Simulation of oscillating water movement in the laboratory for cultivation of shallow water sedentary organisms. Helgolander wiss. Meeresunters. 20:676–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svoboda, A.In press. The orientation of Aglaophenia fans to current in laboratory conditions (Hydrozoa, Coelenterata). In: Mackie, G. O., ed. Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior. Plenum Press; New York.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1975. Strength of pedicle attachment in articulate brachiopods; ecologic and paleoecologic significance. Paleobiology. 1:388–399.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1974. Current induced flow through the sponge, Halichondria. Biol. Bull. 147:443–456.Google Scholar
Vogel, S.In prep. Current induced flow through sponges in situ.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. and Bretz, W. L. 1972. Interfacial organisms: passive ventilation in the velocity gradients near surfaces. Science. 175:210–211.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. and LaBarbera, M.Unpubl. ms. Simple flow tanks for research and teaching. Submitted to Bioscience.Google Scholar
Wainwright, S. A. and Dillon, J. R. 1969. On the orientation of sea fans (genus Gorgonia). Biol. Bull. 136:130–140.Google Scholar