Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T08:30:17.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in body weight and intestinal absorption during infections with Eimeria acervulina in the chicken

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. A. Preston-Mafham  and
A. H. Sykes
R. A. Preston-Mafham
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), near Ashford, Kent
A. H. Sykes
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), near Ashford, Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Heavy infections of E. acervulina result in a depression in body weight of the host, but anorexia induced by the disease is not the only factor responsible for this, since normal birds starved to the same extent did not lose as much weight. It was shown that the absorption of l-histidine and glucose from the infected part of the small intestine was depressed and may be a contributory factor to this weight loss; restricted feed intake alone tended to increase, rather than decrease, absorption.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , December 1970 , pp. 417 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Birt, L. M. & Hird, F. J. R. (1956). The uptake of amino acids by carrot slices. Biochemical Journal 64, 305–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hein, H. (1968). The pathogenic effects of Eimeria acervulina in young chicks. Experimental Parasitology 22, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krebs, H. A. & Henseleit, K. (1932). Untersuchungen uber die Harnstoffbildung in Tierkörper. Hoppe-Seyler's Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie 210, 33–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, P. L. (1967). Studies on Eimeria mivati in chickens and a comparison with E. acervulina. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics 77, 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPherson, H. T. (1946). The basic amino-acid content of proteins. Biochemical Journal 40, 470–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pout, D. D. (1967 a). Villous atrophy and coccidiosis. Nature (London) 213, 306–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pout, D. D. (1967 b). The reaction of the small intestine of the chicken to infection with Eimeria spp. The reaction of the host to parasitism. Veterinary Medical Review, pp. 28–38.Google Scholar
Preston-Mafham, R. A. (1965). The effects of intestinal coccidiosis upon amino-acid absorption in the fowl. M.Sc. dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Preston-Mafham, R. A. & Sykes, A. H. (1967). Changes in permeability of the mucosa during intestinal coccidiosis infections of the fowl. Experientia 23, 972–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, W. M. & Pitois, M. (1965). The influence of coccidiosis on feed and water intake in chickens. Avian Diseases 9, 343–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaffer, P. A. & Hartman, A. F. (1921). The iodometric estimation of copper and its use in sugar analysis. II. Methods for the determination of reducing sugars in blood, urine, milk and other solutions. Journal of Biological Chemistry 45, 365–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheff, M. F. & Smyth, D. H. (1955). An apparatus for the study of in vivo intestinal absorption in the rat. Journal of Physiology 128, 67P.Google Scholar
Turk, D. E. & Stephens, J. F. (1967). Upper intestinal tract infection produced by E. acervulina and absorption of 65Zn and 131I-labelled oleic acid. Journal of Nutrition 93, 161–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E. (1929). Coccidiosis in gallinaceous birds. American Journal of Hygiene 10, 269–383.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. H. & Wiseman, G. (1954). The use of sacs of everted small intestine for the study of the transference of substances from the mucosal to the serosal surface. Journal of Physiology 123, 116–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar