Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T10:17:14.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of the tegument and cercomer of the polycephalic larvae (cercoscolices) of Paricterotaenia paradoxa (Rudolphi, 1802) (Cestoda: Dilepididae) at the ultrastructural level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Barbara M. MacKinnon  and
M. D. B. Burt
Barbara M. MacKinnon
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Bag Service No. 45111, Fredericton, N. B., Canada E3B 6E1
M. D. B. Burt
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Bag Service No. 45111, Fredericton, N. B., Canada E3B 6E1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The development of the tegument and cercomer of Paricterotaenia paradoxa polycephalic larvae was examined using electron microscopy. Larvae are formed by budding from the inner surface of the tegument of the degenerating hexacanth embryo. A new secondary tegument formed around the larvae is probably produced from the original hexacanth sub-tegumental cells. Microvilli covering the surface of young larvae are converted directly into microtriches, as the larvae develop, by addition of electron-dense material to the proximal part of the microvillus. Remnants of the original microvillus are visible at the distal surface of each new microthrix, but they eventually degenerate. The cercomer homologue is represented by scattered follicular cells, bearing microvilli, lying just within the containing cyst wall. The continuity of tegumentary tissue from one developmental stage to the next is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 117 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baron, P. J. (1968). On the histology and ultrastructure of Cysticercus longicollis, the cysticercus of Taenia crassiceps Feder, 1800 (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea). Parastiology 58, 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, P. J. (1971). On the histology, histochemistry and ultrastructure of the cysticercoid of Raillietina cesticillus (Molin, 1858) Fuhrmann, 1920 (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea). Parasitology 62, 233–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolla, R. I. & Roberts, L. S. (1971). Developmental physiology of cestodes. IX. Cytological characteristics of the germinative region of Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology 57, 267–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bortoletti, G. & Ferretti, G. (1973). Investigations on larval forms of Echinoccocus granulosus with electron microscope. Rivista di Parassitologia 34, 89–110.Google Scholar
Bråten, T. (1968). The fine structure of the tegument of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.). A comparison of the plerocercoid and adult stages. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 30, 104–12.Google Scholar
Burt, M. D. B. & Jarecka, L. (1983). Studies on the life cycle of Hymenolepis duetilus Linton, 1927 and on the ultrastructure of its cysticercoid tegument. Acta Parasitologica Polonica (in the Press).Google Scholar
Caley, J. (1974). The functional significance of scolex retraction and subsequent cyst formation in the systicercoid larvae of Hymenolepis microstoma. Parasitology 68, 207–27.Google Scholar
Charles, G. H. & Orr, T. S. C. (1967). The fine structure of the developing pseudophyllid tegument with reference to Ligula intestinalis and Schistocephalus solidus. Parasitology 57, 8P.Google ScholarPubMed
Charles, G. H. & Orr, T. S. C. (1968). Some aspects of the fine structure of the pseudophyllid coracidum and early procercoid. Parasitology 58, 15P–16P.Google Scholar
Collin, W. K. (1970). Electron microscopy of postembryonic stages of the tapeworm, Hymenolepis citelli. Journal of Parasitology 56, 1159–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowe, D. G., Burt, M. D. B. & Scott, J. S. (1974). On the ultrastructure of the polycercus larva of Paricterotaenia paradoza (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). Canadian Journal of Zoology 52, 1397–405.Google Scholar
Dorey, A. E. (1965). The organization and replacement of the epidermis in acoelous turbellarians. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 106, 147–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Gabrion, M. C. (1981). Ontogénèse de cestodes cyclophyllides. Étude morphogénétique du dévelopment post-oncosphéral. Thèse, Académie de Montpellier, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, France.Google Scholar
Gabrion, M. C. & Helluy, S. (1982). Dévelopment larvaire de Paricterotaenia porosa (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea, Dilepididae) chez des diptères du genre Chironomus, hôtes expérimentaux. Annales de Parasitologie 57, 33–52.Google Scholar
Gehring, W. J. & Nothiger, R. (1973). The imaginal discs of Drosophila. In Developmental Systems: Insects, vol. 2, pp. 211–290. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grammeltvedt, A.-F. (1973). Differentiation of the tegument and associated structures in Diphyllobothrium dendriticum Nitsch (1824) (Cestoda; Pseudophyllidea). An electron microscopical study. International Journal for Parasitology 3, 32–17.Google Scholar
Hess, E. & Guggenheim, R. (1977). A study of microtriches and sensory processes of the tetrathyridium of Mesocestoides corti Hoeppli, 1925, by transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 53, 189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulinska, D. (1977). The fine structure and histochemistry of bleb-like extrusions in the microthrix border of the larval Multiceps endothoracicus. Folia Parasitologica 24, 25–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Hulinska, D. (1980). The morphogenesis of microtriches in the tegument of Taenia hydatigena throughout its larval development. Folia Parasitologica 27, 329–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Hulinska, D. & Gubaydulin, N. A. (1976). Rostellar development in the larva of Multiceps endothoracicus (Kirschenblatt, 1948). Folia Parasitologica 23, 51–6.Google Scholar
Hulinska, D., Lavrov, L. I. & Gubaydulin, N. A. (1978). Comparative study on the histochemistry and the fine structure of the suckers and the rostellum of larvae of Multiceps multiceps Leske, 1780 and Multiceps endothoracicus Kirschenblatt, 1948. Folia Parasitologica 25, 247–55.Google Scholar
Jarecka, L. (1975). Ontogeny and evolution of cestodes. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 23, 93–114.Google Scholar
Jarecka, L., Bance, G. N. & Burt, M. D. B. (1983). On the life cycles of Anomotaenia microcantha dominicana (Raifliet et Henry, 1912), with ultrastructural evidence supporting the definition ‘cercoscolex’ for dilepid larvae. Acta Parasitological Polonica (in the Press).Google Scholar
Jarecka, L., Michajlow, W. & Burt, M. D. B. (1981). Comparative ultrastructure of cestode larvae and Janicki's cercomer theory. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 28, 65–72.Google Scholar
Krasnoshchekov, G. P. (1978). Ultrastructure of the cercomere of the cysticercoid Trichocephaloides megalocephala. Parazitologya 12, 206–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Krasnoshchekov, G. P. & Pluzhnikov, L. T. (1980). Differentiation and autophagy of tegument of exocyst Paricterotaenia porosa (Cestoda, Dilepididae). Helminthologia 17, 291–300.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L. (1972). The structure of the helminth cuticle. Advances in Parasitology 10, 347–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, R. D. (1975). Surface ultrastructure and cytochemistry of parasitic helminths. Experimental Parasitology 37, 267–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, R. D. (1966). Cytological studies on the absorptive surface of cestoda. I. Fine structure of the strobilar integument. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 27, 355–82.Google Scholar
Lumsden, R. D., Oaks, J. A. & Mueller, J. F. (1974). Brush border development in the tegument of the tapeworm, Spirometra mansonoides. Journal of Parasitology 60, 209–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKinnon, B. M. & Burt, M. D. B. (1983). Polymorphism of microtriches in the cysticercoid of Ophryocotyle insignis Lönnberg, 1890 from the limpet, Patella vulgata. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61, 1062–70.Google Scholar
Matricon-Gondran, M. (1971). Origine et différenciation du tégument d'un trématode digén étique: étude ultrastructurale chez Cercaria pedtinata (larve de Bacciger bacciger, Fellodistom atidés). Zeitschrifl für Zellforschung 120, 488–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, G. P. & Finnegan, C. V. (1969). Studies of differentiating plerocercoid cuticle of Schistocephalus solidus. II. The ultrastructural examination of cuticle development. Canadian Journal of Zoology 47, 957–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poljakova-Krusteva, O., Donchev, N., Gorchilova, L. & Krustev, L. (1976). Origin, Structure and function of subcuticular cells of Fasciola hepatica. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 50, 285–91.Google Scholar
Race, G. J., Larsh, J. E., Esch, G. W. Jr. & Martin, J. H. (1965). A study of the larval stages of Multiceps serialis by electron microscopy. Journal of Parasitology 51, 364–9.Google Scholar
Rees, F. G. & Day, M. J. (1976). The origin and development of the epidermis and associated structures in the cercaria of Cryptocotyle lingua (Creplin) (Digenea: Heterophyidae) from Littorina littorea (L.). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 192, 299–321.Google ScholarPubMed
Rybicka, K. (1961). Morphological and cytochemical studies on the development of the cestode Diorichis ransomi Schultz 1940. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 9, 279–304.Google Scholar
Rybicka, K. (1964 a). Gametogenesis and embryonic development in Dipylidium caninum. Experimental Parasitology 15, 293–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rybicka, K. (1964 b). Attempt of general approach to the embryology of cyclophyllidean cestodes. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 12, 327–38.Google Scholar
Rybicka, K. (1966). Embryogenesis in Hymenolepis diminuta I. Morphogenesis. Experimental Parasitology 19, 366–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rybicka, K. (1973). Ultrastructure of the embryonic syncytial epithelium in a cestode Hymenolepis diminuta. Parasitology 66, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramlova, J. & Blazer, K. (1981). Ultrastructure of the bladder tegument of Cysticercus bovis in various stages of its development. Folia Parasitologica 28, 61–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Scott, J. S. (1965). The development and morphology of Polycercus lumbricis (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). Parasitology 55, 127–43.Google Scholar
Skaer, R. J. (1965). The origin and continuous replacement of the epidermal cells in the planarian Polycelis tenuis Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 13, 129–239.Google ScholarPubMed
Soltynska, M. S., Mroczka, B. & Moraczewski, J. (1976). Ultrastructure of epidermis in turbellaris from the family Catenulida (Archoophora). Journal of Submicroscopical Cytology 8, 129–39.Google Scholar
Theradgold, L. T. (1965). An electron microscope study of the tegument and associated structures of Proteocephalus pollanicoli. Parasitology 55, 467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikoren, B.-J. & Knuts, G. (1970). Growth of subtegumental tissue in cestodes by cell migration. Acta Academiae Aboensis, B 30, 1–6.Google Scholar