Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T00:16:01.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genotyping of viable Toxoplasma gondii from the first national survey of feral swine revealed evidence for sylvatic transmission cycle, and presence of highly virulent parasite genotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2019

J. P. Dubey Open the ORCID record for J. P. Dubey [Opens in a new window] ,
C. K. Cerqueira-Cézar ,
F. H. A. Murata ,
S. K. Verma ,
O. C. H. Kwok ,
K. Pedersen ,
B. M. Rosenthal  and
C. Su
J. P. Dubey*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD20705-2350, USA
C. K. Cerqueira-Cézar
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD20705-2350, USA
F. H. A. Murata
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD20705-2350, USA
S. K. Verma
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD20705-2350, USA
O. C. H. Kwok
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD20705-2350, USA
K. Pedersen
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, 920 Main Campus Drive, Suite 200 Raleigh, NC, 27606, USA
B. M. Rosenthal
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD20705-2350, USA
C. Su
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN37996-0845, USA
*
Author for correspondence: J. P. Dubey, E-mail: Jitender.dubey@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Feral swine are known reservoirs of various pathogens, including Toxoplasma gondii. Here, we report the first national survey of viable T. gondii in feral swine in the USA. We paired serological surveys with parasite isolation and bioassay to evaluate the prevalence and genetic diversity of these parasites. From 2012–2017, sera and tissues from 1517 feral swine across the USA were collected for the isolation of viable T. gondii. Serum samples were initially screened for antibodies to T. gondii, and then the tissues of seropositive feral swine were bioassayed in mice. Antibodies were detected in 27.7% of feral swine tested by the modified agglutination test (1:25 or higher). Antibody positive rates increased significantly with age, with 10.1% of juveniles, 16.0% of sub-adults and 38.4% of adults testing seropositive. Myocardium (50 g) from 232 seropositive feral swine was digested in pepsin and bioassayed in mice. Viable T. gondii was isolated from 78 feral swine from 21 states. Twelve of the 78 isolates were pathogenic to outbred Swiss Webster mice and 76 of the 78 isolates could be propagated further in cell culture and were genotyped. For genotyping, deoxyribonucleic acid extracted from cell culture-derived tachyzoites was characterized by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism using the genetic markers SAG1, SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, c22-8, c29-2, L358, PK1 and Apico. Genotyping revealed 15 ToxoDB genotypes, including 43 isolates for genotype #5 (haplogroup 12), 11 isolates for #24, four isolates for #2 (haplogroup 3), two isolates for each of genotypes #3 (haplogroup 2), #4 (haplogroup 12), #216, #221, #289 and #297 and one isolate for each of genotypes #1 (haplogroup 2), #39, #66, #260, #261 and #299. Genotype #5 was the most frequently isolated, accounted for 57% (43/76) of the isolates, followed by #24, accounted for 14% (11/76). Genotypes #260, #289, #297 and #299 are new types. Genotype #289 was highly virulent to mice and originated from feral swine collected in Louisiana on the same day at the same location. Genotype #216 was previously demonstrated to be highly virulent to mice. Our results indicate moderate genetic diversity of T. gondii in feral swine in the USA, with the genotype #5 (haplogroup 12) dominant in the continental USA, whereas genotype #24 (10/14) was dominant in Hawaii, suggesting different population structures of the parasites among the two distinct geographical locations.

Keywords

Feral swine (Sus scrofa)isolationToxoplasma gondiitoxoplasmosisUSA
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 147 , Issue 3 , March 2020 , pp. 295 - 302
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubert, D, Ajzenberg, D, Richomme, C, Gilot-Fromont, E, Terrier, ME, de Gevigney, C, Game, Y, Maillard, D, Gibert, P, Dardé, ML and Villena, I (2010) Molecular and biological characteristics of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from wildlife in France. Veterinary Parasitology 171, 346–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crouch, EEV, Mittel, LD, Southard, TL, Cerqueira-Cézar, CK, Murata, FHA, Kwok, OCH, Su, C and Dubey, JP (2019) Littermate cats rescued from a shelter succumbed to acute, primary toxoplasmosis associated with TOXO DB genotype #4, generally circulating in wildlife. Parasitology International 72, article 101942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubey, JP (1995) Duration of immunity to shedding of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by cats. Journal of Parasitology 81, 410–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubey, JP (2010) Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, 2nd Edn. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press, pp. 1–313.Google Scholar
Dubey, JP and Desmonts, G (1987) Serological responses of equids fed Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. Equine Veterinary Journal 19, 337–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubey, JP and Prowell, M (2013) Ante-mortem diagnosis, diarrhea, oocyst shedding, treatment, isolation and genetic typing of Toxoplasma gondii associated with clinical toxoplasmosis in a naturally-infected cat. Journal of Parasitology 99, 158–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubey, JP, Murrell, KD, Hanbury, RD, Anderson, WR, Doby, PB and Miller, HO (1986) Epidemiologic findings on a swine farm with enzootic toxoplasmosis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 189, 55–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Dubey, JP, Thulliez, P and Powell, EC (1995) Toxoplasma gondii in Iowa sows: comparison of antibody titers to isolation of T. gondii by bioassays in mice and cats. Journal of Parasitology 81, 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubey, JP, Su, C, Oliveira, J, Morales, JA, Bolaños, RV, Sundar, N, Kwok, OCH and Shen, SK (2006) Biologic and genetic characteristics of Toxoplasma gondii isolates in free-range chickens from Costa Rica, Central America. Veterinary Parasitology 139, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubey, JP, Velmurugan, GV, Rajendran, C, Yabsley, MJ, Thomas, NJ, Beckmen, KB, Sinnett, D, Ruid, D, Hart, J, Fair, PA, McFee, WE, Shearn-Bochsler, V, Kwok, OCH, Ferreira, LR, Choudhary, S, Faria, EB, Zhou, H, Felix, TA and Su, C (2011) Genetic characterisation of Toxoplasma gondii in wildlife from North America revealed widespread and high prevalence of the fourth clonal type. International Journal for Parasitology 41, 1139–1147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubey, JP, Choudhary, S, Kwok, OCH, Ferreira, LR, Oliveira, S, Verma, SK, Marks, DR, Pedersen, K, Mickley, RM, Randall, AR, Arsnoe, D and Su, C (2013a) Isolation and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from mute swan (Cyngus olor) from the USA. Veterinary Parasitology 195, 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubey, JP, Hill, D, Zarlenga, D, Choudhary, S, Ferreira, LR, Oliveira, S, Verma, SK, Kwok, OCH, Driscoll, CP, Spiker, H and Su, C (2013b) Isolation and characterization of new genetic types of Toxoplasma gondii and prevalence of Trichinella murrelli from black bear (Ursus americanus). Veterinary Parasitology 196, 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubey, JP, Verma, SK, Calero-Bernal, R, Cassinelli, AB, Kwok, OCH, van Why, K, Su, C and Humphreys, JG (2015) Isolation and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from black bears (Ursus americanus), bobcats (Lynx rufus), and feral cats (Felis catus) from Pennsylvania. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 62, 410–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feitosa, TF, Vilela, VLR, de Almeida-Neto, JL, dos Santos, A, de Morais, DF, Alves, BF, Nakashima, F, Gennari, SM, Athayde, ACR and Pena, HFJ (2017) High genetic diversity in Toxoplasma gondii isolates from pigs at slaughterhouses in Paraíba state, northeastern Brazil: circulation of new genotypes and Brazilian clonal lineages. Veterinary Parasitology 224, 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, TCR, Buery, JC, Moreira, NIB, Santos, CB, Costa, JGL, Pinto, LV, Baraviera, RCA, Vitor, RWA and Fux, B (2018) Toxoplasma gondii: isolation, biological and molecular characterisation of samples from free-range Gallus gallus domesticus from countryside Southeast Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 27, 384–389.Google ScholarPubMed
Hill, DE, Haley, C, Wagner, B, Gamble, HR and Dubey, JP (2010) Seroprevalence of and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii in the US swine herd using sera collected during the National Animal Health Monitoring Survey (Swine 2006). Zoonoses and Public Health 57, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, DE, Dubey, JP, Baroch, JA, Swafford, SR, Fournet, VF, Hawkins-Cooper, D, Pyburn, DG, Schmit, BS, Gamble, HR, Pedersen, K, Ferreira, LR, Verma, SK, Ying, Y, Kwok, OC, Feidas, H and Theodoropoulos, G (2014) Surveillance of feral swine for Trichinella spp. and Toxoplasma gondii in the USA and host-related factors associated with infection. Veterinary Parasitology 205, 653–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, HH, Huang, SY, Zhou, DH, Zhang, XX, Su, C, Deng, SZ and Zhu, XQ (2013) Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from pigs from different localities in China by PCR-RFLP. Parasites & Vectors 6, 227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, T, Shwab, EK, Martin, RM, Gerhold, RW, Rosenthal, BM, Dubey, JP and Su, C (2018) A partition of Toxoplasma gondii genotypes across spatial gradients and among host species, and decreased parasite diversity towards areas of human settlement in North America. International Journal for Parasitology 48, 611–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jokelainen, P, Murat, JB and Nielsen, HV (2018) Direct genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from clinical samples from Denmark: not only genotypes II and III. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 37, 579–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A, Dubey, JP, Su, C, Ajioka, JW, Rosenthal, BM and Sibley, LD (2011) Genetic analyses of atypical Toxoplasma gondii strains reveals a fourth clonal lineage in North America. International Journal for Parasitology 41, 645–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomares, C, Devillard, S, Holmes, TH, Olariu, TR, Press, CJ, Ramirez, R, Talucod, J, Estran, R, Su, C, Dubey, JP, Ajzenberg, D and Montoya, JG (2018) Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii DNA samples isolated from humans living in North America: an unexpected high prevalence of atypical genotypes. Journal of Infectious Diseases 218, 1783–1791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richomme, C, Aubert, D, Gilot-Fromont, E, Ajzenberg, D, Mercier, A, Ducrot, C, Ferté, H, Delorme, D and Villena, I (2009) Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from wild boar (Sus scrofa) in France. Veterinary Parasitology 164, 296–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rostami, A, Riahi, SM, Fakhri, Y, Saber, V, Hanifehpour, H, Valizadeh, S, Gholizadeh, M, Pouya, RH and Gamble, HR (2017) The global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among wild boars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Veterinary Parasitology 244, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shwab, EK, Saraf, P, Zhu, XQ, Zhou, DH, McFerrin, BM, Ajzenberg, D, Schares, G, Hammond-Aryee, K, van Helden, P, Higgins, SA, Gerhold, RW, Rosenthal, BM, Zhao, X, Dubey, JP and Su, C (2018) Human impact on the diversity and virulence of the ubiquitous zoonotic parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, E6956–E6963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, C, Shwab, EK, Zhou, P, Zhu, XQ and Dubey, JP (2010) Moving towards an integrated approach to molecular detection and identification of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitology 137, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velmurugan, GV, Su, C and Dubey, JP (2009) Isolate designation and characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from pigs in the United States. Journal of Parasitology 95, 95–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verma, SK, Sweeny, AR, Lovallo, MJ, Calero-Bernal, R, Kwok, OC, Jiang, T, Su, C, Grigg, ME and Dubey, JP (2017) Seroprevalence, isolation, and co-infection of multiple Toxoplasma gondii strains in individual bobcats (Lynx rufus) from Mississippi, USA. International Journal for Parasitology 47, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, D, Liu, Y, Jiang, T, Zhang, G, Yuan, G, He, J, Su, C and Yang, N (2016) Seroprevalence and genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii isolated from pigs intended for human consumption in Liaoning province, northeastern China. Parasites & Vectors 9, 248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Work, TM, Verma, SK, Su, C, Medeiros, J, Kaiakapu, T, Kwok, OC and Dubey, JP (2016) Toxoplasma gondii antibody prevalence and two new genotypes of the parasite in endangered Hawaiian geese (nene: Branta sandvicensis). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 52, 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, P, Nie, H, Zhang, LX, Wang, HY, Yin, CC, Su, C, Zhu, XQ and Zhao, JL (2010) Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from pigs in China. Journal of Parasitology 96, 1027–1029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Dubey et al. supplementary material

Dubey et al. supplementary material 1

Download Dubey et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dubey et al. supplementary material

Dubey et al. supplementary material 2

Download Dubey et al. supplementary material(File)
File 25.3 KB