Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T09:11:28.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Haplotype comparisons of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato via mitochondrial gene sequences (co1, cytb, nadh1) among Pakistan and its neighbouring countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2021

Aisha Khan
Affiliation:
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research); Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology; National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases; National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases; Shanghai; China The School of Global Health, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan
Haroon Ahmed*
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan
Sami Simsek
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Firat, Elazig, Turkey
Khuram Shahzad
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan
Figen Celik
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Firat, Elazig, Turkey
Muhammad Sohail Afzal
Affiliation:
Department of Lifesciences, School of Science, University of Management & Technology (UMT), Lahore, Pakistan
Mobushir Riaz Khan
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Science, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia
Hua Liu
Affiliation:
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research); Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology; National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases; National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases; Shanghai; China The School of Global Health, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Yujuan Shen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research); Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology; National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases; National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases; Shanghai; China The School of Global Health, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Jianping Cao*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research); Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology; National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases; National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases; Shanghai; China The School of Global Health, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
*
Author for correspondence: Haroon Ahmed, E-mail: haroonahmad12@yahoo.com; Jianping Cao, E-mail: caojp@yahoo.com
Author for correspondence: Haroon Ahmed, E-mail: haroonahmad12@yahoo.com; Jianping Cao, E-mail: caojp@yahoo.com

Abstract

Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s.l.) is a zoonotic parasite that causes cystic echinococcosis (CE) in humans. However, E. granulosus sensu stricto (s.s.) is considered the predominant species in CE infections worldwide. According to the population genetic diversity and structure of E. granulosus s.l., gene flow can explain the parasite drift among the neighbouring countries of Pakistan. The mitochondrial (mt) co1 (n = 47), nadh1 (n = 37) and cytb (n = 35) nucleotide sequences of E. granulosus s.l. isolates from Pakistan, Iran, China and India were retrieved from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information database to determine the genealogical relationships. The sequences were grouped as the mt-co1 (genotypes G1 and G3, G6-G7), mt-cytb (genotypes G1 and G3), and mt-nadh1(genotypes G1 and G3). The data were analysed using bioinformatic tools. A total of 19 polymorphic sites for the mt-co1 sequence (374 bp) were observed of which 31.6% (6/19) were parsimony-informative sites. Unique singleton haplotypes within the E. granulosus s.s. haplotype network based on the mt-co1 gene were highly prevalent (68.4%; 13/19) in Pakistani isolates followed by Chinese, Indian and Iranian isolates; four polymorphic sites were detected in the E. canadensis (G6/G7). In E. canadensis mt-co1 haplotype network, 75% (3/4) unique singleton haplotypes were from the Iranian isolates. Twelve polymorphic sites were found using the mt-cytb sequence (547 bp); 25% (3/12) were parsimony-informative and there were 66.7% (8/12) unique singleton haplotypes within the mt-cytb haplotype network in E. granulosus s.s. with the most reported from Pakistan followed by Iran and China. 20 polymorphic sites were detected in E. granulosus s.s. mt-nadh1 sequences (743 bp); 20% (4/20) were parsimony-informative. There were 66.7% (8/12) main single haplotypes within the mt-nadh1 haplotype network, with the most reported from Pakistan followed by that from India, Iran and China. The sequence analyses show low nucleotide diversity and high haplotype diversity in general.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addy, F, Wassermann, M, Kagendo, D, Ebi, D, Zeyhle, E, Elmahdi, IE, Umhang, G, Casulli, A, Harandi, MF, Aschenborn, O, Kern, P, Mackenstedt, U and Romig, T (2017) Genetic differentiation of the G6/7 cluster of Echinococcus canadensis based on mitochondrial marker genes. International Journal for Parasitology 47, 923931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez Rojas, CA, Romig, T and Lightowlers, MW (2014) Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato genotypes infecting humans – review of current knowledge. International Journal for Parasitology 44, 918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avise, JC (2000) Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badaraco, JL, Ayala, FJ, Bart, JM, Gottstein, B and Haag, KL (2008) Using mitochondrial and nuclear markers to evaluate the degree of genetic cohesion among Echinococcus populations. Experimental Parasitology 119, 453459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandelt, HJ, Forster, P and Röhl, A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 3748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boufana, B, Lett, WS, Lahmar, S, Buishi, I, Bodell, AJ, Varcasia, A, et al. (2015) Echinococcus equinus and Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto from the United Kingdom: genetic diversity and haplotypic variation. International Journal for Parasitology 45, 161166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butt, A and Khan, JA (2020) Cystic echinococcosis: a 10-year experience from a middle-income country. Tropical Doctor 50, 117121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casulli, A, Interisano, M, Sreter, T, Chitimia, L, Kirkova, Z, Rosa, GL, et al. (2012) Genetic variability of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in Europe inferred by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 12, 377383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fomda, BA, Khan, A, Thokar, MA, Malik, AA, Fazili, A, Dar, RA, Sharma, M and Malla, N (2015) Sero-epidemiological survey of human cystic echinococcosis in Kashmir, North India. PLoS ONE 10, e0124813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haag, KL, Alves-Junior, L, Zaha, A and Ayala, FJ (2004) Contingent, non-neutral evolution in a multicellular parasite: natural selection and gene conversion in the Echinococcus granulosus antigen B gene family. Gene 333, 157167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haleem, S, Niaz, S, Qureshi, NA, Ullah, R, Alsaid, MS, Alqahtani, AS, et al. (2018) Incidence, risk factors, and epidemiology of cystic echinococcosis: a complex socioecological emerging infectious disease in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, province of Pakistan. Biomed Research International 2018, 5042430. doi: 10.1155/2018/5042430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamenetzky, L, Gutierrez, AM, Canova, SG, Haag, KL, Guarnera, EA, Parra, A, et al. (2002) Several strains of Echinococcus granulosus infect livestock and humans in Argentina. Infection Genetics and Evolution 2, 129136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A, Ahmed, H, Khan, H, Saleem, S, Simsek, S, Brunetti, E, Afzal, MS, Manciulli, T and Budke, CM (2020) Cystic echinococcosis in Pakistan: a review of reported cases, diagnosis, and management. Acta Tropica 212, 105709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinkar, L, Laurimae, T, Simsek, S, Balkaya, I, Casulli, A, Manfredi, MT, et al. (2016) High-resolution phylogeography of zoonotic tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto genotype G1 with an emphasis on its distribution in Turkey, Italy and Spain. Parasitology 143, 17901801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinkar, L, Laurimae, T, Sharbatkhori, M, Mirhendi, H, Kia, EB, Ponce-Gordo, F, et al. (2017) New mitogenome and nuclear evidence on the phylogeny and taxonomy of the highly zoonotic tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto. Infection Genetics and Evolution 52, 5258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinkar, L, Laurimäe, T, Acosta-Jamett, G, Andresiuk, V, Balkaya, I, Casulli, A, et al. (2018) Global phylogeography and genetic diversity of the zoonotic tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto genotype G1. International Journal for Parasitology 48, 729742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Koutsoumanis, K, Allende, A, Alvarez-Ordóñez, A, Bolton, D, Bover-Cid, S, Chemaly, M, Davies, R, De Cesare, A, Herman, L, Hilbert, F, Lindqvist, R, Nauta, M, Peixe, L, Ru, G, Simmons, M, Skandamis, P, Suffredini, E, Cacciò, S, Chalmers, R, Deplazes, P, Devleesschauwer, B, Innes, E, Romig, T, van der Giessen, J, Hempen, M, Van der Stede, Y and Robertson, L (2018) Public Health Risks Associated with Food-Borne Parasites. EFSA Journal 16, e05495.Google ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Stecher, G, Li, M, Knyaz, C and Tamura, K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 15471549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leigh, J, Bryant, D and Steel, M (2015) PopART (Population Analysis with Reticulate Trees) (Technical report, University of Otago, New Zealand, http://popart.otago.ac.nz).Google Scholar
Moudgil, AD, Moudgil, P, Asrani, RK and Agnihotri, RK (2019) Hydatidosis in slaughtered sheep and goats in India: prevalence, genotypic characterization and pathological studies. Journal of Helminthology 94, e27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakao, M, Lavikainen, A, Yanagida, T and Ito, A (2013) Phylogenetic systematics of the genus Echinococcus (Cestoda: Taeniidae). International Journal for Parasitology 43, 10171029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakao, M, Li, T, Han, X, Ma, X, Xiao, N, Qiu, J, et al. (2010) Genetic polymorphisms of Echinococcus tapeworms in China as determined by mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 379385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rojas, CAA, Fredes, F, Torres, M, Acosta-Jamett, G, Alvarez, JF, Pavletic, C, et al. (2016) First meeting cystic echinococcosis in Chile, update in alternatives for control and diagnostics in animals and humans. Parasites & Vectors 9, 502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozas, J, Ferrer-Mata, A, Sánchez-DelBarrio, JC, Guirao-Rico, S, Librado, P, Ramos-Onsins, SE and Sánchez-Gracia, A (2017) DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34, 32993302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahnazi, M, Hejazi, H, Salehi, M and Andalib, AR (2011) Molecular characterization of human and animal Echinococcus granulosus isolates in Isfahan, Iran. Acta Tropica 117, 4750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharbatkhori, M, Mirhendi, H, Harandi, MF, Rezaeian, M, Mohebali, M, Eshraghian, M and Kia, EB (2010) Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in livestock of Iran indicating high frequency of G1 genotype in camels. Experimental Parasitology 124, 373379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, M, Fomda, BA, Mazta, S, Sehgal, R, Singh, BB and Malla, N (2013) Genetic diversity and population genetic structure analysis of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto complex based on mitochondrial DNA signature. PLoS ONE 8, e82904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, B, Dhand, N, Ghatak, S and Gill, JPS (2013) Economic losses due to cystic echinococcosis in India: need for urgent action to control the disease. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 113, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, BB, Sharma, JK, Tuli, A, Sharma, R, Bal, MS, Aulakh, RS and Gill, JPS (2014) Prevalence and morphological characterisation of Echinococcus granulosus from north India. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 38, 3640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, JD and Smyth, MM (1969) Self insemination in Echinococcus granulosus in vivo. Journal of Helminthology 43, 383388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spotin, A, Mahami-Oskouei, M, Harandi, MF, Baratchian, M, Bordbar, A, Ahmadpour, E and Ebrahimi, S (2017) Genetic variability of Echinococcus granulosus complex in various geographical populations of Iran inferred by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Acta Tropica 165, 1016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Wang, N, Hu, D, Zhong, X, Wang, S, Gu, X and Yang, G (2014a) Genetic diversity of Echinococcus granulosus in southwest China determined by the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 gene. The Scientific World Journal, Volume 2014, 867839. doi: 10.1155/2014/867839.Google Scholar
Wang, Q, Huang, Y, Huang, L, Yu, W, He, W, Zhong, B, et al. (2014b) Review of risk factors for human echinococcosis prevalence on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China: a prospective for control options. Infectious Diseases of Poverty 3, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, H, Vuitton, L, Tuxun, T, Li, J, Vuitton, DA, Zhang, W and McManus, DP (2019) Echinococcosis: advances in the 21st century. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 32, e00075–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagida, T, Mohammadzadeh, T, Kamhawi, S, Nakao, M, Sadjjadi, SM, Hijjawi, N, et al. (2012) Genetic polymorphisms of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in the Middle East. Parasitology International 61, 599603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W, Zhang, Z, Wu, W, Shi, B, Li, J, Zhou, X, et al. (2015) Epidemiology and control of echinococcosis in Central Asia, with particular reference to the People's Republic of China. Acta Tropica 141, 235243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, X, Wang, N, Hu, D, Wang, J, Liu, T, Gu, X, Wang, S, Peng, X and Yang, G (2014) Sequence analysis of cytb gene in Echinococcus granulosus from Western China. Korean Journal of Parasitology 52, 205209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed