Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T11:08:24.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Labelling larvae of the cattle-tick Boophilus microplus, with 32P to follow their movements on the host

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. H. Kemp
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Long Pocket Laboratories, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia
D. Koudstall
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Long Pocket Laboratories, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia
J. D. Kerr
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Long Pocket Laboratories, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia

Summary

After 24 h desiccation at 28–29 °C and approximately 50 % relative humidity about 70 % of B. microplus larvae drank sufficient solution containing 1·5 mCi of 32P per ml for their movements on the host to be followed with a portable G-M counter. Reduced viability of the labelled ticks could not be detected when they were kept for 24 h on the host and either allowed to feed or prevented from doing so. When feeding was continued for 72 h or when larvae were incubated for 3–4 weeks, adverse effects were found, the severity of which could not be directly related to the amount of 32P label. Desiccation, handling of larvae and exposure to radiation in the drinking solution may have contributed to their reduced viability.

Since resistance to the tick is manifest within the first 24 h after infestation labelled larvae could be used to compare development on different hosts during this time. Even after feeding for 72 h, larvae were more adversely affected by host resistance than by labelling damage.

We would like to thank Mr C. A. Schuntner for helpful advice and Mrs J.Galligan for technical assistance. The financial support of the Australian Meat Research Committee is gratefully acknowledged. Messrs D. Hancox and S. R.Henderson assisted with some of the experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babenko, L. V. (1960). The use of radioisotopes for labelling ticks. Meditsinskaya Parazitologiya i Parazitarnye Bolezni 29, 320–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Hyland, K. E. Jr. & Hammar, J. L. (1959). Transovarial passage of radioactivity in ticks labelled with C14 glycine. Journal of Parasitology 45, Suppl.yes24–5.Google Scholar
Knapp, S. E., Farinacci, C. J., Herbert, C. M. & Saenger, E. L. (1956). A method of labelling the lone star tick with a radioactive indicator (P32). Journal of Economic Entomology 49, 393–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. A. (1968). Resistance of cattle to Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). II. Stages of the life cycle of the parasite against which resistance is manifest. Journal of Parasitology 54, 667–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J. A. (1971). Behaviour of larvae of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) on cattle of differing degrees of resistance. Journal of Parasitology 57, 651–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuntner, C. A. & Tatchell, R. J. (1971). Drinking by larval cattle-ticks Boophilus microplus (Acarina: Ixodidae). Journal of Parasitology 56, 1239–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshine, D. E. (1968). Radioisotopes in studies on the ecology of tick vectors of disease. In Isotopes and Radiation in Entomology: proceedings of a symposium, pp. 3152. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Sonenshine, D. E. & Yunker, C. E. (1968). Radiolabelling of tick progeny by inoculation of procreant females. Journal of Economic Entomology 61, 1612–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, P. R. & Wilson, J. T. (1959). Survival of cattle ticks in Central Queensland pastures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, P. W. & Bates, D. H. (1960). Saturated solutions for the control of humidity in biological research. Ecology 41, 232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar