Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T00:05:13.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mites (Acarina) parasitic on mammals, birds and reptiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Charles D. Radford
Charles D. Radford
Affiliation:
Membre Correspondant, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The author (1943) published a paper under the title ‘Genera and Species of Parasitic Mites (Acarina)’. This paper has been in great demand by workers interested in the parasitic Acarina and the number of separates was speedily exhausted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 40 , Issue 3-4 , October 1950 , pp. 366 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allman, G. J. (1847). Description of a new genus and species of Tracheary Arachnidans. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 20, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustson, G. F. (1945). A new genus and new species of Dermanyssid mite (Acarina) from Texas. Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. 44, 46–8.Google Scholar
Banks, N. (1899). A new species of the genus Halarachne. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 4, 212–14.Google Scholar
Banks, N. (1901). A new genus of endoparasitic Acarians. Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Indie, 41, 330–4.Google Scholar
Banks, N. (1904). A treatise on the Acarina, or mites. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 28, 1–114.Google Scholar
Banks, N. (1905). Descriptions of some new mites. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 7, 133–42.Google Scholar
Banks, N. (1909). New Canadian mites. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 11, 133–43.Google Scholar
Banks, N. (1910). New American mites. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 12, 2–12.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1882–1892). Acari, Myriopoda et Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta. Patavii, Florentiae.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlese, A. (1888). Acari Austro Americani. Bull. Soc. ent. ital. 20, 171–224.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1903 a). Acari Nuovi. Manipulus I. Redia, 1, 260.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1930 b). Diagnosi di alcune nuove specie di Acari italiani Mirmecofili e liberi. Zool. Anz. 27, 14.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1906). Monographia del genera Gamasus Latr. Redia, 3, 66–304.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1910). Acari Nuovi. Redia, 6, 199–234.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1911). Acarorum species novae quindecim. Redia, 7, 429–35.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1917). Centuria seconda di Acari nuovi. Redia, 12, 125–77.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1918). Centuria quarta di Acari nuovi. Redia, 13, 115–90.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1921). Centuria quinta di Acari nuovi. Redia, 14, 143–95.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. & Trouessart, E. L. (1889). Diagnoses d'Acariens nouveaux et peu connus. Bull. Bibl. Sci. l'Ouest, 9, 121–43.Google Scholar
Berthold, A. A. (1845). Beulemilbe. Lehrb. Zool. Gottingen, pp. 349–53.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1906). Présence des Acariens du genre Halarachne chez les Phoques de l'Océan Antarctique. Arch. Parasit., Paris, 10, 313.Google Scholar
Canestrini, G. & Fanzago, F. (1877). Intorno agli Acari italiani. Atti 1st. veneto, 4 (5), 69–208.Google Scholar
Canestrini, G. & Canestrini, R. (1882). I Gamasi Italiani. Mono-grafia. Atti. Soc. Veneto-Trent.Google Scholar
Canestrini, G. (1885). Prospetto dell' Acarofauna italiana. Atti. Soc. Veneto-Trent.Google Scholar
Canestrini, G. (1895). Ueber einen neuen Parasiten der Saugethiere. Zool. Anz. 18, 114–15.Google Scholar
Chandler, W. L. & Ruhe, D. S. (1940). Pneumonyssus caninum n.sp. a mite from the frontal sinus of the dog. J. Parasit. 26, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claparede, E. (1868). Studien an Acariden. Z. wiss. Zool. 18, 445–546.Google Scholar
Cooreman, J. (1946). Rhinoecius oti, n.gen., n.sp. (Acarien, Rhinonyssinae). Bull. Mus. Hist. nat. Belg. 22, 9, 1–4.Google Scholar
Csokor, J. (1897). Über Haarsackmilben und eine neue Varietät derselben bei Schweinen, Demodex phylloides. Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien, 29, 419–50.Google Scholar
Degeer, C. (1778). Mémoires pour servir á l'histoire des Insectes, 7, 94.Google Scholar
Doetschman, W. H. (1944). A new species of endo-parasitic mite of the family Halarachnidae (Acarina). Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 63, 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duges, A. (1834). Nouvelles observations sur les Acariens. Ann. Sci. nat. (zool.), 11, 104–6.Google Scholar
Ehlers, E. (1873). Die Kratzmilben der Vögel. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Sarcoptiden. Z. wiss. Zoll. 23, 228–53.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1910). New Acarina from India. Trans. Acad. Sci. St Louis, 19, 113–21.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1922). Dermanyssid mites of N. America. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 62, no. 13, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1924 a). A new mite from the lung of a rattlesnake. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 26, 179.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1924 b). Ectoparasites of some Polynesian and Malaysian rats of the genus Rattus. Bull. Bish. Mus. Honolulu, 14, 7–11.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1925 a). New mites of the family Der-manyssidae. Ent. News, 36, 18–22.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1925 b). New mites of the parasitic genus Haemogamasus Berlese. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 38, 138–43.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1925 c). New parasitic mites of the genus Laelaps. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 27, no. 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1929 a). Manual of External Parasites. Baltimore: C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1929 b). Notes on the lung mites of Primates (Acarina: Dermanyssidae) including the description of a new species. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 31, 126–30.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1933 a). New genera and species of parasitic mites of the superfamily Parasitoidea. Proc. U.S.Nat. Mus. 82, no. 30, 1–14.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1933 b). A new pit-producing mite from the scales of a South American snake. J. Parasit. 20, no. 1, 53–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1936). A short synopsis of the North American species of the mite genus Dermanyssus. Proc. Ent. soc. Wash. 38, 47–54.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1938). North American mites of the subfamily Myobiinae, new subfamily (Arachnida). Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 40, no. 1, 180–97.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. & Bakeb, E. W. (1947). Myonyssus jamesoni, a new Liponyssid mite (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from Blarina brevicauda (Say). J. Parasit. 33, no. 4, 376 –9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewing, H. E. & Stover, A. J. (1915). New parasitic mites (Acarina). Ent. News, 26, 109–14.Google Scholar
van Eyndhoven, G. L. (1940). Ein neuer Fledermaus-parasit Labidocarpus belsorum nov.spec. (Acar.). Zoll. Anz. 130, 9/10, 230–4.Google Scholar
van Eyndhoven, G. L. (1946). Diagnoses of two epizootic mites. (Chiropterological notes, no. 24). Ent. Ber., Amst., 12, 267/268, 30–31.Google Scholar
Fahrenholz, H. (1908). Aus dem Myobien Nachlass des Herrn Poppe. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen, 19, 3, 359–70.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1925). On the species of the genus Halarachne (Acarina: Gamasidae). Parasitology, 17, 163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1932). Ectoparasites of Marquesan rats. Bull. Bish. Mus. Honolulu, 98, 117–27.Google Scholar
Finnegan, S. (1934). On a new species of mite of the family Halarachnidae from the Southern sea lion. ‘Discovery’ Rep. 7, 319–28.Google Scholar
Floch, H. & Abonnenc, E. (1944). Description d'un acarien nouveau: Geckobia guyanensis n.sp. (Fam. Pterygosomatidae) parasite d'un platydactyle. Publ. Inst. Pasteur Guyane, 93, 1–9.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1932). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan. 7, 135–46.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1934). Der Schlangenparasit Ixobioides butantanensis n.gen., n.sp. Z. Parasitenk. 6, 4, 508–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1935 a). New Genera and Species of Acari ‘Laelaptidae’ from Brazilian Rodents. XII Con-gres Int. zool. Lisbon, pp. 1597–1615.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1935 b). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan. 9, 33–8, 43–72 and 89–97.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1936). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan. 10, 43–6, 51–9.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1938). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan. 12, 7–53, 103–23 and 147–54.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1939 a). Os Laelaptidae gigantes, parasitas de roedores sul americanos; genero e especies novos (Acari). Mem. Inst. Butantan. 12, 7–53.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1939 b). Novos estudos sobre o genero Laelaps Koch, 1836 (Acari: Laelaptidae). Mem. Inst. Butantan. 12, 103–23.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1939 c). Liponissus bra-siliensis sp.n., parasita habitual de roedores e acidental do homen. Mem. Inst. Butantan. 12, 147–54.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1940 a). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan. 14, 53–64.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1940 b). Notas de Acareologia. Rev. Ent. S. Paulo (Rio de J.), 11, 104–19.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1941 a). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan. 15, 103–18.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1941 b). Notas de Acareologia. Ciencia Mexico, 2, 6/7, 262–5.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1942). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan. 16, 149–56.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. da (1948). A Monograph of the genera and species of Macronyssidae Oudemans, 1936 (Synon: Liponyssidae Vitzthum, 1931) (Acari). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 118, no. 2, 249–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, I. (1937). A new Cheyletid mite (Acarina) parasitic on the Caroline Jumping Mouse, Zapus hudsonicus americanus (Barton). Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 39, 227–30.Google Scholar
Fox, I. (1946). A new genus Borinquolaelaps, and new species of mites from rats in Puerto Rico. J. Parasit. 32, no. 5, 445–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furstenberg, M. H. F. (1861). Die Kratzmilben der Menschen und Thiere. Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, P. (1844). Hist. Nat. Ins. Apt. 3, 133–288.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. (1871). Ueber einige Milbon. Z. Ges. Naturw. 38, 31–2.Google Scholar
Gunther, C. E. M. (1942 a). New parasitid mites from New Guinea (Acarina: Parasitidae). Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 67, nos. 1/2, 87–9.Google Scholar
Gunther, C. E. M. (1942 b). Notes on the Listrophoridae (Acarina: Sarcoptoidea). Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 67, nos. 3/4, 109–10.Google Scholar
Haller, G. (1877). Freyana und Picobia, zwei neue Milbengattungen. Z. wiss. Zoll. 30, 91.Google Scholar
Haller, G. (1880). Zur Kenntnis der Tyroglyphiden und Verwandten. Z. wiss. Zool. 34, 255–95.Google Scholar
Haller, G. (1882). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Milben-fauna Wurttembergs. Jber. Ver. not. Wirtt. p. 312.Google Scholar
Haller, G. (1884). Beschreibung einiger neuen Milben. Arch. Naturgesch, 1, 217–36.Google Scholar
Hefley, H. M. (1935). A new mite from the common skunk: Mephitis nigra. J. Kans. Ent. Soc. 8, no. 1, 22–4.Google Scholar
Hering, (1838). Die Kratzmilben d. Thier u. e. verw. arten. Nova Acta Leop. Carol. 18, 2, 573–624.Google Scholar
Hermann, J. F. (1804). Mémoire Apterologique. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
von Heyden, C. H. G. (1826). Versuch einer System-atischen Eintheilung der Acariden. Oken, Isis, 19, 608–13.Google Scholar
Hirst, S. (1912). On two new parasitic Acari of the genus Leiognathus Cn. Bull. Ent. Res. 3, 369–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1913). On three new species of Gamasid mites found on rats. Bull. Ent. Res. 4, 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1914 a). Preliminary list of the Acari occurring on the brown rat (Mus norvegicus) in Great Britain, with the description of a new species (Haemogamasus oudemansi). Bull. Ent. Res. 5, no. 2, 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1914 b). On the parasitic Acari found on the species of rodents frequenting human habitations in Egypt. Bull. Ent. Res. 5, 215–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1914 c). Report on the Arachnida and Myrio-poda collected by the British Ornithologists Union Expedition and the Wollaston Expedition in Dutch New Guinea. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 20, no. 10, 325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1915 a). On a blood-sucking Gamasid mite (Ichoronyssus serpentium sp.n.?) parasitic on Couper's snake. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 383–6.Google Scholar
Hirst, S.(1915 b). On some new Acarine parasites of rats. Bull. Ent. Res. 6, 183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1916). Notes on Parasitic Acari. Descriptions of two new African mites of the family Gamasidae. J. Zool. Res. 1, 76–81.Google Scholar
Hirst, S. (1917 a). On some new mites of the suborder Prostigmata living on lizards. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 19, 136–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1917 b). On three new parasitic Acari. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 20, 431–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1918). On four new species of the genus Demodex Owen. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9), 2, 145–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1919). On two new parasitic mites (Myocoptes intoni and Psoroptes natalensis). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9), 3, 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1921). On some new parasitic mites. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 769–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1923 a). On three new species of Laelaps occurring on S. African rodents. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9), 12, 690–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1923 b). On some new or little known species of Acari. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 971–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1925 a). Descriptions of new Acari, mainly parasitic on Rodents. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1925 b). Acarina (excl. Ixodidae) in Parasito-logia Mauritanica. Bull. Com. A.O.F.O. Senegal, 8, 95–100.Google Scholar
Hirst, S. (1926). On the parasitic mites of the suborder Prostigmata(Trombidioidea)found onlizards. J. Linn. Soc. Zool. 36, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1927). Note on Acari, mainly belonging to the genus Spinturnix von Heyden. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1931). On some new Australian Acari (Trom-bidiidae, Anystidae and Gamasidae). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 561–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, A. M. (1944 a). Un nuevo acaro parasito de murcielagos. Ann. Inst. Biol., Mexico, 15, no. 1, 185–9.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A. M. (1944 b). Periglischrus vargasi n.sp. (Acarina: Parasitidae). Rev. Inst. Salubr. Enferm. trop. Mexico, 5, 2, 91–6.Google Scholar
Hubbard, W. E. (1938). Ophiopneumicola colubri n.gen., n.sp., a lung mite from a snake. Trans Amer.Micr. Soc. 57, 400–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, W. E. (1939). Entonyssus ewingi n.sp. an Ophidian lung mite. Amer. Midl. Nat. 21, 657–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, E. W. (1947). A new mite Eubrachylaelaps crowei from the grasshopper mouse, Onychomys leuco-gaster arcticeps (Rhoads). J. Parasit. 33, no. 5, 391–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameson, E. W. (1948). Myobiid mites (Acarina: Myo-biinae) from Shrews (Mammalia: Soricidae) of Eastern North America. J. Parasit. 34, no. 4, 336–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameson, E. W. (1949). Myobiid mites (Acarina: Myo-biidae) from Condylura cristata (Linnaeus) and Neuro-trichus gibbsii (Baird) (Mammalia: Talpidae). J. Para. sit. 35, no. 3, 423–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keegan, H. L. (1943). Three new Ophidian lung mites of the sub-family Entonyssinae Ewing, 1922. Para-etiology, 35, 128–33.Google Scholar
Keegan, H. L. (1946). Six new mites of the superfamily Parasitoidea. Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 65, no. 1, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, C. L. (1835–1844). Crustaceen, Myriopoden und Arachniden Deutschlands. Regensburg.Google Scholar
Koch, C. L. (1842). Uebersicht des Arachnldensystems. 3.Google Scholar
Kolenati, F. A. (1856). Parasiten der Chiroptern. Vers. dtsch. naturf. Aertzte. pp. 25–9.Google Scholar
Kolenati, F. A. (1857). Synopsis prodroma der auf Chiroptern als Epizooen vorkommenden Lausmilben Carida, Kolenati. Wien. ent. Mschr. 1 (2), 4–7.Google Scholar
Kolenati, F. A. (1858). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Arachniden. S.B. Akad. wiss. Wien, 35, 155–90.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. (1796). Précis des caractères génériques des Insectes, etc. Brive.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. F. (1935). The prostigmatic mites of South African lizards. Parasitology, 27, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. F. (1936). The prostigmatic mites of South African lizards. Parasitology, 28, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. F. (1938). A new parasite of bats. Parasitology, 30, 309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. F. (1939). A new mite from the South African Pangolin. Parasitology, 31, 451–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. F. (1944). A new parasitic mite from the Golden Mole. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 114, 302–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. F. (1948 a). Some new pilicolous mites from South African mammals. Parasitology, 39, 39–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, R. F. (1948 b). Studies on some parasitic mites from Canada and South Africa. J. Parasit. 34, no. 5, 364–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leidy, J. (1872). On a mite in the ear of the ox. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad. pp. 9–10, 118.Google Scholar
Leydig, F. (1859). Ueber Haarsack und Kratzmilbe. Arch. Naturgesch. 25, 345.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae (10th ed.), 1, 615–18.Google Scholar
Ljungh, S. I. (1799). Nova Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Uppsala, 6, 10.Google Scholar
Lombardini, G. (1944). Spinturnix vespertilionis (L.) Duf. Ianzai v.n. Redia, 30, 5.Google Scholar
Megnin, P. (1876). Mémoire sur l'organisation et la distribution zoologique des Acariens de la Famille des Gamasides. J. Anat. Phys. 12, 228–336.Google Scholar
Megnin, P. (1877). Monographie de la Tribu des Sarcoptides Psoriques, qui comprend tous les Acariens de la gale de l'Homme et des Animaux. Rev. zool. (3), 5, 46–213.Google Scholar
Megnin, P. (1878). Note sur un nouvel acarien parasite (Geckobia latasti). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 5, 8.Google Scholar
Megnin, P. (1879). Les Acariens parasites du tissu cellulaire et des reservoirs aériens chez les oiseaux. J. Anat. Phys. 15, 123–53.Google Scholar
Megnin, P. (1880). Les Parasites et les Maladies Para-sitaires. 478 pp., 26 pls. and 63 text-figs. Paris.Google Scholar
Megnin, P. (1884). étude sur l'Ophionyssus natricis P. Gervais. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 9, 107–13.Google Scholar
Meillon, B. de & Lavoipierre, M. (1944). New records and species of biting insects from the Ethiopian region. J. Ent. Soc. S. Afr. 7, 38–67.Google Scholar
Michael, A. D. (1844). On an undescribed Acarus of the genus Myobia. J. Quekett Micr. Cl. (2), 2, 1–7.Google Scholar
Michael, A. D. (1889). On some unrecorded parasitic Acari found in Great Britain. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 20, 400–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, A. D. (1892). On the variations in the internal anatomy of the Gamasinae. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 5, 31–7.Google Scholar
Neumann, L. G. (1902). Spelaeorhynchus praecursor n.gen., n.sp. Nouvel Acarien parasite. Arch. parasit. 5, 31–7.Google Scholar
Newell, I. M. (1947). Studies on the Morphology and Systematics of the family Halarachnidae Oudemans, 1906 (Acarina: Parasitoidea). Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll. 10, nos. 3/4, 235–66.Google Scholar
Newstead, R. & Todd, J. D. (1906). On a new Der-manyssid Acarid. Mem. Lpool Sch. Trop. Med. 18, 41–4.Google Scholar
Nitzsch, C. L. (1818). Acarina in Ersch & Gruber. Allg. Encycl. Wiss. 1, 246–52.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1897). Tijdschr. Ent. 40, 49–50.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1898). A Sareoptes of a bat, Nycterido-coptes Poppei n.g., n.sp. Tijdschr. Ent. 40, nos. 3/4, 270.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1901). Notes on Acari. Third Series. Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver. 7, 50–88.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1902 a). Acarologische Aanteeke-ningen. 6. Ent. Ber., Amst., 6, 36.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1902 b). Notes on Acari. Fourth Series. Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver. (2), 7, nos. 3/4, 276–311.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1904 a). Notes on Acari. Eleventh Series. Tijdschr. Ent. 46, 93–134.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1904 b). Laelaps versteegii, a new species of parasitic mite. Notes Leyden Mus. 24, no. 9, 223–31.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1906). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. 22. Ent. Ber., Amst., 28, 55–62.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1910). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. 32. Ent. Ber., Amst., 53, 67–74.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1912). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. 39. Ent. Ber., Amst., 3, 63, 215–17.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1914). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. 52. Ent. Ber., Amst., 4, 76, 65–73.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1916). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. 60. Ent. Ber., Amst., 4, 91, 308–16.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1925). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. 79. Ent. Ber., Amst., 7, 146, 26–34.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1928). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. 94. Ent. Ber., Amst., 7, 164, 374–82.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1929). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. 99. Ent. Ber., Amst., 8, 169, 11–20.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1935). Kritische Literaturubersieht zur Gattung Pneumonyssus. Beschreibung dreier Arten darunter einer neuen. Z. Parasitenk. 7, 4, 466–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1939). Neue Funde auf dem Gebiete der Systematik und der Nomenelatur der Acari. Zool. Anz. 126, 303–9.Google Scholar
Pagenstecher, H. A. (1861 a). Listrophorus leuckarti, ein neues Milbengeschlecht. Siebold Kolliker. Zool. 11, 109–19.Google Scholar
Pagenstecher, H. A. (1861 b). Listrophorus gibbus, nebst nachträglichen Bemerkungen über Listrophorus leuckarti. Siebold Kolliker. Zool. 11, 151–61.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. S. (1929). Two new mites from the gills of land crabs. Pap. Tortugas. Lab. 26, 225–30.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. S. (1930). Parasites of Crustacea. Ann. zool. Japan. 13, 1–8.Google Scholar
Perkins, M. (1925). On Acanthophthirius elheldredae, a new genus and species of Anoplura from the Pipi-strelle bat. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (9) 16, 175–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, W. (1849). Eine neue Acarine Gattung Ptery-gosoma. S.B. ges. naturf. Fr. Berl. 19, 6.Google Scholar
Poppe, S. A. (1887). Über parasitische Milben. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen, 10, 1, 205.Google Scholar
Poppe, S. A. (1896). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Gattung Myobia v. Heyden. Zool. Anz. 19, 508/9, 327–33 and 337–49.Google Scholar
Poppe, S. A. & Trouessart, E. L. (1895). Sur les métamorphoses du genre Myobia et diagnoses d'espéces nouvelles d'Acariens. Bull. Soc. Ent. Fr. 8, 84.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1934). Notes on mites of the genus Myobia. Pt. I. Northw. Nat. 9, 356–64.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1935). Notes on mites of the genus Myobia. Pt. II. Northw. Nat. 10, 248–58.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1936 a). Notes on mites of the genus Myobia. Pt. III. Northw. Nat. 11, 34–9.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1936 b). Notes on mites of the genus Myobia. Pt. IV. Northw. Nat. 11, 144–51.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1937). A new species of mite of the genus Entonyssus Ewing. Northw. Nat. 12, 38–42.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1938 a). Pneumonyssus procavians n.sp. a new lung mite. Ann. Transv. Mus. 19 (2), 147–52.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1938 b). Notes on some new species of parasitic mites. Parasitology, 30, 427–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1939). Notes on some new species of parasitic mites. Pt. 2. Parasitology, 31, 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1940). Notes on some new species of parasitic mites. Pt. 3. Parasitology, 32, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1941). Notes on some new species of parasitic mites. Pt. 4. Parasitology, 33, 306–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1942 a). New ectoparasitic mites (Acarina) from Uganda. Parasitology, 34, 185–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1942 b). New parasitic mites (Acarina). Parasitology, 34, 294–307.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1943). Genera and species of parasitic mites (Acarina). Parasitology, 35, 58–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1944). New parasitic mites (Acarina) from rodents. Parasitology, 35, 161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1947 a). Parasitic mites from snakes and rodents. (Acarina, Cheyletidae, Listrophoridae and Laelaptidae). Proc. Zool. Soc. Land. 117, 228–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1947 b). Two new bat mites of the genus Ancystropus (Acarina: Spinturnicidae). Proc. Zool. Soc.Lond. 117, 305–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1948 a). New parasitic mites (Acarina: Myialgesidae and Listrophoridae). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 118, 933–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1948 b). A revision of the fur mites Myobiidae (Acarina). Bull. Mus. Hist. nat. Paris, 20 (2), 5, 458–64; 6, 525–31 et seq.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. (1895). Traité de Zoologie Médicate et Agricole, 2nd ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redi, F. (1674). Esperionze intorno all Generazione degl' Insetti, etc. Firenze.Google Scholar
Rodhain, J. (1921). Un Sarcoptide, nouveau parasite de la Roussette Africaine (Eidolon helvum Kerr). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 84, 757–9.Google Scholar
Rodhain, J. (1923). Deux Sarcoptides psoriques parasites des Roussettes Africaine au Congo. Rev. zool.afr. 11, 17–39.Google Scholar
Sambon, L. W. (1928). Ophioptes parkeri. A new species and genus of Cheyletid inhabiting the scales of reptiles. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 22, no. 1, 137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L. (1940). Entonyssus vitzthumi (Acarina) a new Ophidian lung mite. J. Parasit. 26, 309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Schrank, F. P. (1781). Pediculus muris musculi. Enum. Insect. Aust. indig. pp. 501–2.Google Scholar
Sellnick, M. (1941). Milben von Fernando Poo. Zool. Anz. 136, 11/12, 221–8.Google Scholar
Selustick, M. (1944). Eine neue parasitische Milbe von Epimys norvegicus Erxl. Z. Parasitenk. 13, 248–53.Google Scholar
Strandtmann, R. W. (1941). A new species of mite, Ichoronyssus dentipes (Acarina: Liponyssinae), from the Cotton Rat. J. Parasit. 33, no. 1, 51–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strandtmann, R. W. (1947). Atricholaelaps megaven-tralis, a new species of parasitic mite. (Acarina: Laelaptidae). Ent. Soc. Wash. 49, no. 4, 112–14.Google Scholar
Strandtmann, R. W. (1948 a). Atricholaelaps traubi and A. chinchillulae from Callosciurius and the Chinchilla respectively. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 50, no. 7, 187–92.Google Scholar
Strandtmann, R. W. (1948 b). The Mesostigmatic nasal mites of birds. I. Two new genera from shore and marsh birds. J. Parasit. 34, no. 6, 505–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibaboschi, C. (1904). Les Rats, les Souris, et leurs parasites cutanes, dans leurs rapportes avec le propagation de la peste bubonique. Arch. Parasit., Paris, 8, 337–8.Google Scholar
Tbagardh, I. (1904). Monographie der arktischen Acariden. Fauna arctica, p. 41. Jena.Google Scholar
Tkaqardh, I. (1905). Acariden aus Agypten und der Sudan. Swed. Zool. exp. Egypt White Nile, 2, 1–124.Google Scholar
Tbagardh, I. (1908). Kilimandjaro-Meru Expedition, Uppsala, 20, no. 3, 54–7.Google Scholar
Tragakdh, I. (1931). Acarina from the Juan Fernandez Islands. Nat. Hist. Juan Fernandez and Easter Islands, Uppsala, 3, 553–628.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1893). Note sur les Sarcoptides pilicoles (Listrophorinae). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 45, 698–700.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1894). Note sur les Aoariens parasites des fosses nasales des oiseaux. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 1 (10), 723–31.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1895 a). Note sur un Acarien parasite des fosses nasales de l'Oie domestique. Rev. Sci. Nat. app. Bull. Soc. nat. d'Acclimatation, 42, 392–4.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1895 b). Sur les métamorphoses du genre Myobia et diagnoses d'espéces nouvelles d'Acariens. Bull. Soc. Ent. 8, 84.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1895 c). Description d'un genre nouveau (Labidocarpus) et de deux nouvelles de Sarcoptides pilicoles, avec figures. Bull. Soc. ent. France, Congr. Ann. pp. 38–9, 82–7.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1896 a). Genre nouveau et espéce nouvelle de Sarcoptides pilicoles (Chirodiscinae) (Acariens: Arach.). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. pp. 27–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1896 b). Description du Schizocarpus mingaudi (Arachn) nouveau Sarcoptide pilicole vivant sur le Castor. Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. pp. 91–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1896 c). Sur un nouveau type de Sarcoptides pilicoles (Schizocarpus mingaudi g. et sp.n) vivant sur le Castor. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 48, 109–10.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1902). Existence de la Parthéno-genése chez le ‘Oamasus auris’ Leidy de l'oreille du Bœuf domestique. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 54, 1335–7.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1904). Leiognathus blanchardi sp.n. Acarien parasite de la Marmotte des Alpes. Arch. Parasit., Paris, 8, 558–61.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1917). Troisième note sur les Sarcoptides pilicoles et description de genres nouveaux. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 42, 151–8.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. & Neumann, G. (1890). Un type nouveau de Sarcoptides plumicoles le Chirodiscus amplexans g.n., sp.n. Bull. sci. Fr. Belg. 22, 392–8.Google Scholar
Tubb, J. A. (1937). Arachnida in Report of the Expedition of the McCoy Society for Field Investigation and Research (Lady Julia Percy Island). Proc. Boy. Soc. Vict. N.S. 49, no. 2, 412–21.Google Scholar
Tube, F. A. (1945 a). Studies of Acari—Second Series. Descriptions of new species and notes on established forms of parasitic mites. Parasitology, 36, 133–41.Google Scholar
Turk, F. A. (1945 b). Studies of Acari. V. Notes on and descriptions of new and little-known British Acari. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (II), 12, 785–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, F. A. (1946). A new genus and two new species of mites parasitic on Muridae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (II), 13, 347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, F. A. (1947). Studies of Acari. IV. A Review of the lung mites of snakes. Parasitology, 38, nos. 1/2, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, F. A. (1948). Insecticolous Acari from Trinidad, B.W.I. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 118, 82–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrrell, J. B. (1883). On the occurrence in Canada of two species of parasitic mites. Proc. Canad. Inst. 1, 332–43.Google Scholar
Ullrich, H. (1939). Über einige neue Schmarotzer-milben dei Elch, Biber und Schneehase. Z. Parasitenk. 10, 553–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vail, E. L. & Augustson, G. F. (1943). A new ectoparasite (Acarina: Cheyletidae) from domestic rabbits. (Ewingella gen.nov. americana sp.n.) J. Parasit. 29, no. 6, 419–21.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1914). Beschreibung einiger neuen Milben. Zool. Anz. 44, 323.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1918). Acarologische Beobach-tungen. 2 Reihe. Arch. Naturgesch. 84, 1–40.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1920). Acarologische Beobach-tungen. 4 Reihe. Arch. Naturgesch. 86, 1–69.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1924). Acarologische Beobach-tungen. 8 Reihe. Arch. Naturgesch. 90, 10, 1–86.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1925). Die unterirdische Acaro-fauna. Jena Z. Naturw. 62, 125–86.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1926). Malayische Acari. Treubia, 8, 1, 1–198.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1928 a). Acarologische Beobach-tungen. 12 Reihe. Zool. Anz. 75, 181–98.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1928 b). Acarologische Beobach-tungen. 13 Reihe. Zool. Anz. 75, 281–95.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1930 a). Milben als Pestträger. Zool. Jb. 60, 381–428.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1930 b). Pneumonyssus stammeri, ein neuer Lungenparasit. Z. Parasitenk. 2, 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1930 c). Acarologische Beobach-tungen. 14 Reihe. Zool. Jb. 59, 2/3, 281–350.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1931 a). Neu parasitische Fleder-mausmilben aus Venezuela. Z. Parasitenk. 4. 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1931 b). In Kukenthals, Handbuch der Zoologie, 3, 2, 1–160.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1935 a). Über die Gattung Entonys-sus Ewing (Acari). Z. Parasitenk. 7, 709–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1935 b). Milben aus der Nasenhöhle von Vögeln. J. Ornith. 83, 563–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1941). Acarina in Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, 5, 5, Lfg. 1–7, 1–1100.Google Scholar
Vizioli, F. (1868). Osservazioni microscopiche sopra alcuni noduli sottocutanei de' polli e descrizione di un nuovo genere di Acaridei parasita degli uccelli. (Sar-coptes cisticola n.g. et n.sp.) Giorn. anat. Fisiol. 1, 257–72.Google Scholar
Vorobiov, M. M. (1938). Description of the morphology and biology of List (r) ophorus larisi n.sp. found on white mice. Actes Sci. Inst, veter. Kiev, 1, 151–7.Google Scholar
Walkenaer, C. A. (1847). Histoire Naturelle des Insectes, Apteres, 4, 346–54. Paris.Google Scholar
Weidman, F. D. (1916). Cytoleichus penrosei, a new arachnoid parasite found in the diseased lungs of a prairie dog, Cynomys ludovicianus. J. Parasit. 3, 82–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, C. & Wherry, W. B. (1910). Somenew internal parasites of the California ground squirrel. (Otospermophilus beecheyi). J. Parasit. 3, 417–22.Google Scholar
Wharton, G. W. (1938). Acarina of Yucatan Caves. Publ. Carnegie Instn, 491, 137–52.Google Scholar
Wharton, G. W. (1941). Acarina collected on the presidential cruise of 1938. Smithson. misc. Coll. 99, no. 12, 1–8.Google Scholar
Willmann, C. (1936). Steatonyssus spinosus, eine neue Milbe von Solenodon paradoxus Brdt. Zool. Anz. 114, 5/6, 152–7.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. (1937). Studies in Australian Acarina, Laelaptidae. Parasitology, 29, 530–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womersley, H. (1941 a). Notes on the Cheyletidae (Acarina: Trombidoidea) of Australia and New-Zealand, with descriptions of new species. Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 7, 51–64.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. (1941 b). New species of Geckobia (Acarina: Pterygosomidae) from Australia and New Zealand. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 65, 323–8.Google Scholar
Yamada, S. (1930). Observations on a house-infesting mite (Liponyssus nagayoi n.sp.) which attacks human beings. Zool. Mag., Tokyo, 43, 237–49.Google Scholar
Zurn, F. A. (1874). Die Schmarotzer auf und in dem Korper unserer Haussaugetier sowie die durch erstere veranlassten Krankheiten, deren Behandlung und Ver-hutung. 2 v. Weimar.Google Scholar