Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T07:20:11.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on some new species of parasitic mites. Part 4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

Prof. P. A. Buxton sent me a number of tubes of mite material to examine, and in one bearing the label ‘Gerbille, Madras, India, 3. v. 37, C. S. Swaminath’, I found a number of mites of the genus Laelaps, which were obviously new, in so far as the shape of the anal scutum was decidedly wider than any known species of this genus. This species I have herein described under the name Laelaps buxtoni

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ewing, H. E. (1922). Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 62, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyden, V. (1826). Isis p. 613.Google Scholar
Hirst, S. (1915). Bull. ent. Res. 6, 183–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1921). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 769802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1925). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 4969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, M. (1925). Ann. Mag. not. Hist. 9, 175–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppe, S. A. (1896). Zool. Anz. 19, 327–33, 337–49.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1934). North-West Nat. 9, 356–64.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1935). North-West Nat. 10, 248–58.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1936). North-West Nat. 11, 34–9, 144–51.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1938). Parasitology, 30, 427–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1939). Parasitology, 31, 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1940). Parasitology, 32, 91104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Schrank, F. P. (1781). Enumerotio insect. Anst. indig. p. 501.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1914). Zool. Anz. 44, 315–28.Google Scholar