Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T14:01:13.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Three New Proteocephalids (Cestoda) and a Revision of the Genera of the Family

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

W. N. F. Woodland
W. N. F. Woodland
Affiliation:
Wellcome Bureau of Scientific Research, Endsleigh Gardens, London, N.W. 1.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When La Rue (1914 a) published his exhaustive monograph on the Proteocephalidae, all the then-known species of this family were, with one exception, shown to be very much alike. To substantiate this statement it will suffice to mention that all the six genera, into which La Rue grouped the species, were chiefly based upon trivial characters of the scolex and the distribution of the testes. The one exception referred to was the species which he re-named Monticellia coryphicephala (Monticelli), and this species differed from all the others in the remarkable and relatively deep-seated character of its principal genital organs being situated in the cortical region of the parenchyma instead of in the medullary. This one exception was promptly transferred by La Rue to a distinct new family, the Monticellidae, and the consequence was that he was still left dependent upon the aforesaid trivial characters as bases for his genera in the original family. Since 1914 however we have come to know of some other Proteocephalids exhibiting similar deep-seated differences of structure, and we are therefore in a position to re-consider the classification of the Proteocephalidae on broader lines, including Monticellia coryphicephala in that family. The general scheme of this re-classification I have already outlined in a paper (Woodland, 1925 a) which will be published either before or shortly after the present communication, and it is my purpose, in this latter, to justify the suggestions there referred to by discussing the subject in some detail. Before attempting this, however, I shall describe the structure of three new Proteocephalids, two from India (in a frog and a Varanid lizard) and one from the Sudan (in a Siluroid fish).

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1925 , pp. 370 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchamp, P. De (1916). Sur quelques Parasites provenant du Congo Belge. Rev. Zool. Afric. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, P. De (1918). Reprinted in Bull. Soc. Zool. France, XLIII. 14.Google Scholar
Beddard, F. E. (1913 a). Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrangement of the Cestoidea. VII. On Six Species of Tapeworms from Reptiles belonging to the Genus Ichthyotaenia (s.l.). Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Part 1, p. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddard, F. E. (1913 b): Contributions, etc. VIII. On some Species of Ichthyotaenia and Ophidotaenia from Ophidia. Proc. Zool. Soc. London p. 153.Google Scholar
Beddard, F. E. (1913 c). Contributions, etc. IX. On a new Genus of Ichthyotaeniids. Proc. Zool. Soc. London p. 243.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1894–1900). In Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Thierreichs, Vol. IV. Vermes, Abt. 1, b. Cestodes.Google Scholar
Faust, E. C. (1920). Two new Proteocephalidae. Journ. Parasit. VI. 79.Google Scholar
Fritsch, G. (1886). Die Parasiten des Zitterwelses. Sitzungsb. k. preuss. Akad. Wissensch. Berlin, Jahrg. 1886, p. 99.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1916). Eigentümliche Fischcestoden. Zool. Anzeig. (1915–16), XLVI. 385.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1924). Two new Species of Reptilian Cestodes. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. XVIII. 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungerbühler, M. (1910). Studien an Gyrocotyle und Cestoden. Denkschr. Med.-Natur. Gesellch. Jena, XVI. 497.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. (1910). On a new Reptilian Cestode. Journ. Proc. Royal Soc. N.S.W. XLIII. 103.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. (1911). Proteocephalus gallardi: a new Cestode from the Black Snake. Ann. Queensland Mus. No. 10, p. 175.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. (1912). Notes on some Entozoa. Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland, XXIV. 63.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. (1914). Second Report on the Cestoda and Acanthocephala collected in Queensland. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. VIII. 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larue, G. R. (1911). A Revision of the Cestode Family Proteocephalidae. Zool. Anzeig. XXXVIII. 473.Google Scholar
Larue, G. R. (1914 a). A Revision of the Cestode Family Proteocephalidae. Illinois Biological Monographs, Univ. of Illinois (Urbana, Illinois), I. Nos. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Larue, G. R. (1914 b). A new Cestode, Ophiotaenia cryptobranchi, nov. spec., from Cryptobranchus allegheniensis (Daudin). XVI Report Mich. Acad. Science, p. 11.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. F. B. (1903). Drei neue Tänien aus Ceylon. Centrbl. Bakt., Parasit. u. Infektionskr. I Abt. Orig. XXXIII. 532.Google Scholar
Lönnberg, E. (1889). Bidrag till Kännedomen on i Sverige förekommande Cestoder. Bih. till Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl. XIV. Afd. IV. No. 9.Google Scholar
Lönnberg, E. (1894). Ueber eine neue Tetrabothriumspecies und die Verwandtschaftverhältnisse der Ichthyotänien. Centrbl. Bakt., Parasit. u. Infektionskr. XV. 801.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1899). Zur Kenntnis einiger Distomen. Zool. Anzeig. XXII. 524.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1910). Parasitische Plattwürmer. II. Cestodes, in Heft 18 of Brauer's Die Süss-wasserfauna Deutschlands.Google Scholar
Maccallum, G. A. (1921). Studies in Helminthology. Zoopathologica, I. 141.Google Scholar
Magath, T. B. (1924). Ophiotaenia testudo, a new Species from Amyda spinifera. Journ. Parasit. XI 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monticelle, Fr. Sav. (1891). Notizie su di alcune Specie di Taenia. Boll. Soc. di Nat. in Napoli, Ser. I, V. 151.Google Scholar
Monticelle, Fr. Sav. (1899). Sul Tetrabothrium Gerrardii Baird. Atti Soc. Nat. e Mat. di Modena (4) 32, I. p. 9.Google Scholar
Nybelin, O. (1917). Results of Dr E. Mjöberg's Swedish Scientific Expedition to Australia, 1910–1913. XIV Australische Cestoden. Kungl. Svenska Veten. Handl. LII. No. 14.Google Scholar
Von Ratz, St. (1900). Trois nouveaux Cestodes de Reptiles. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. LII. 980.Google Scholar
Riggenbach, E. (1896). Das Genus Ichthyotaenia. Rev. Suisse Zool. et Ann. Mus. d*apos;Hist. Nat. Genève, IV. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, R. (1908). Die Ichthyotaenien der Reptilien und Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Bothriocephalen. Inaug.-Dissert. Univ. Basle, 52 pp. and 7 plates.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1900) in Willey's Zoological Results, Part V, p. 548.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1904). Some Parasites from Ceylon. Spolia Zeylanica, Colombo Museum, I. 45.Google Scholar
Sonsino, P. (1895). Di alcuni Entozoi raccolti in Egitto finora non descritti. Mon. Zoolog. Ital. VI. 121.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1916). On some Indian Cestoda. Part II. Rec. Ind. Mus. XII. Part 1, p. 5.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. and Adler, S. (1923). A Note on Ophiotaenia punica (Cholodovski, 1908) La Rue, 1911. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. XVII. 333.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1895). Notizie elmintologiche. Boll. Soc. Adriat. Sci. Nat. Trieste, XVI. 33.Google Scholar
Wedl, K. (1862). Zur Helminthenfauna Ägyptens. Sitzungsb. Math.-Nat. Classe k. Akad. Wissensch. XLIV. I Abt., Jahrg. 1861, p. 463.Google Scholar
Weinlakd, D. F. (1853). Human Cestoides. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1923). On some remarkable new Forms of Caryophyllaeidae from the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, and a Revision of the Families of the Cestodaria. Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci. LXVII. 435.Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1924 a). On a new Species of the Cestodarian Genus Caryophyllaeus from an Egyptian Siluroid. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Part II, p. 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1924 b). On a new Bothriocephalus and a new Genus of Proteocephalidae from Indian fresh-water Fishes. Parasitology, XVI. 441.Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1925 a). On some remarkable new Monticellia-like and other Cestodes from Sudanese Siluroids. Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci. LXIX. (the autumn number).Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1925 b). Tetracampos Wedl, 1861, as a Genus of the Bothriocephalidae. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. XIX. No. 2.Google Scholar