Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T20:24:57.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The pH of the alimentary tract in normal and Giardia-infected culture mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

M. H. Haiba
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Giza, Egypt

Extract

Among the principal intestinal factors that play a part in the host-parasite relationships, the pH values of the parasite's habitat within the host under various conditions are of great significance. As stated previously (Haiba & Williamson, 1952), among the intestinal Protozoa of man and animals, Giardia is of much interest owing to its selective localization on the inner epithelial surface or occasionally inside the goblet cells of the upper two-thirds of the small intestine, representing an important area where the main maximal intestinal functions are carried out. Accordingly, the pH of the intestinal wall, as distinct from that of the contents, is likely to be a pertinent environmental factor in giardial infections.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ball, G. H. (1935). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 32, 702.Google Scholar
Ball, G. H. (1939). Amer. J. Physiol. 128, 175.Google Scholar
Ball, G. H. (1940). J. Lab. Clin. Med. 25, 992.Google Scholar
Boeck, W. C. (1917). Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 18, 126.Google Scholar
Haiba, M. H. (1950). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 44, 360.Google Scholar
Haiba, M. H. & Williamson, J. (1952). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 46, No. 1, 85.Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A. & Christiansen, R. B. (1915). Univ. Calif. Pub. Zool. 16, 30.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. (1940). Science, 92, 92.Google Scholar
Voegtlin, C., Kahler, H. & Fitch, R. H. (1935). Nat. Inst. Hlth Bull. 164, 15.Google Scholar