Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T17:25:52.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The respiratory metabolism of parasitic nematodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

W. P. Rogers
W. P. Rogers
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Health and Production, McMaster Animal Health Laboratory, Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Qo2 values for Haemonchus contortus egs varied between − 9·7 and − 12·6 according to the degree of development of the embryos. The r.q. was in the region of 0·6.

2. Young infective larvae of Nippostrongylus muris had a high Qo2 (−18·4), which fell as the larvae aged. Third stage Haemonchus contortus larvae gave similar results. The respiration was not affected by exsheathment.

3. Adult parasites gave Qo2 values as follows: Ascaridia galli, − 2·5; Nematodirus spp., − 5·1; Nippostrongylus muris, − 6·8; Neoaplectana glaseri, − 12·6. When calculated on a surface area basis, Ascaridia galli had an oxygen uptake which was much higher than that of the other organisms.

4. Qco2 values were small. The r.q. of infective larvae, which contain fat as reserve material, was about 0·72. The other forms which contained much glycogen as well as fat had r.q. values between 0·6 and 0·7. A. galli was an exception in that an r.q. of about 0·95 was obtained.

5. Potassium cyanide inhibited respiration in all the forms examined.

The author is indebted to Dr R. W. Glaser for supplying a strain of Neoaplectana glaseri.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 39 , Issue 1-2 , July 1948 , pp. 105 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

v. Brand, Th. (1942). Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, 82, 1.Google Scholar
Gilmour, D. (1940). J. cell. comp. Physiol. 15, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, R. W., McCoy, E. E. & Girth, H. B. (1940). J. Parasit. 26, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, H. A. (1939). Tabulae Biologicae, 9, 209.Google Scholar
Krogh, A. (1941). The Comparative Physiology of Respiratory Mechanisms. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Krüger, F. (1940). Z. wiss. Zool. 152, 547.Google Scholar
Laser, H. (1942). Biochem. J. 36, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laser, H. (1944). Biochem. J. 38, 333.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1939). J. Helminth. 17, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1940). J. Helminth. 18, 183.Google Scholar
Specht, H. (1934). J. cell. comp. Physiol. 5, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stannard, J. N., McCoy, O. R. & Latchford, W. B. (1938). Amer. J. Hyg. 27, 666.Google Scholar
Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H. & Stauffer, J. F. (1945). Manometric Techniques and Related Methods for the Study of Tissue Metabolism. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Warburg, O. (1924). Biochem. Z. 152, 51.Google Scholar
Warburg, O. (1926). Biochem. Z. 164, 481.Google Scholar