Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T22:32:05.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some new Myxosporidia from Plymouth with a proposed new classification of the Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Yogendra R. Tripathi
Yogendra R. Tripathi
Affiliation:
From the Marine Biological Laboratory, Plymouth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Four new species of myxosporidian parasites are described from marine fishes from Plymouth: Sinuolinea rebae n.sp., from the urinary bladder of Solea solea; Leptotheca vikrami n.sp., from the gall bladder of Zeus faber; Zschokkella russelli n.sp., from the gall bladder of Gaidropsarus tricirratus and Ciliata mustela; and Zschokkella sturionis n.sp., from the gall bladder of Acipenser sturio.

The various terms used in describing the spore of Myxosporidia are reviewed and revised.

A new classification is proposed of the order Myxosporidia.

I wish to thank the Director of the Marine Biological Association's Laboratory for all the facilities he has enabled me to enjoy during my stay at Plymouth, by dedicating a new species of Zschokkella to him. As a mark of gratitude, and with a deep sense of respect to His Highness the Maharaja of Narsinghgarh State, C.I., I take the liberty of dedicating to him the new species of Leptotheca I have discovered. But for his encouragement and help in the early stages of my career it would have been impossible for me to apply for the India State Scholarship which I now hold. I take this opportunity of expressing my thanks to Miss N. G. Sproston for her unfailing help and encouragement during the present studies and am very grateful to her for going through the manuscript critically.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 39 , Issue 1-2 , July 1948 , pp. 110 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auerbach, (1910). Zool. Anz. 35, 57.Google Scholar
Auerbach, (1910). Zool. Anz. 35, 240.Google Scholar
Auerbach, (1911). Zool. Jb. 30, 471.Google Scholar
Basikalowa, A. (1932). Wissenschaftliches Zentralinstitut für Fischereiwirtschaft, Moscow, p. 136.Google Scholar
Bhatia, B. L. (1938). Fauna of British India: Sporozoa, pp. 336. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, M. (1941). J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 6, 69.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, M. (1943). Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. B, 18, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordero, E. H. (1919). Physis, B. Aires, 4, 403.Google Scholar
Davis, H. S. (1917). Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. 35, 201.Google Scholar
Davis, H. S. (1924). Rep. U.S. Comm. Fish. for 1923, Appendix 8, 5 pp.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, P. (1925). Ann. Soc. Sci. Brux. 44, 374.Google Scholar
Dunkerley, J. S. (1915). Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edinb. 19, 213.Google Scholar
Dunkerley, J. S. (1921). Parasitology, 12, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkerley, J. S. (1925). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 69, 185.Google Scholar
Doflein, F. (1899). Zool. Zbl. 6 (361).Google Scholar
Doflein, F. (1901). Die Protozoen als Parasiten und Krankheitserreger nach biologischen Gesichtspunkten dargestellt. Jena.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doflein, F. (1902). Arch. Protistenk. 1, 169.Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B., Porter, A. & Richardson, L. R. (1939). Parasitology, 31, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, T. (1923). J. Coll. Agric. Sapporo, 10, 191.Google Scholar
Fujita, T. (1924). Jap. J. Zool. 1, 45.Google Scholar
Fujita, T. (1927). J. Coll. Agric. Sapporo, 16, 229.Google Scholar
Georgevitch, J. (1926). Arch. zool. exp. gén. 65, 57.Google Scholar
Gurley, R. R. (1894). Rep. U.S. Comm. Fish. 26, 65.Google Scholar
Jameson, A. P. (1929). J. Parasit. 16, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, A. P. (1931). J. Parasit. 18, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klokacewa, S. (1914). Zool. Anz. 44, 182.Google Scholar
Kudo, R. R. (1920). Illinois Biol. Monogr. 5, 1.Google Scholar
Kudo, R. R. (1922). Parasitology, 14, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, R. R. (1929). Arch. Protistenk. 65, 364.Google Scholar
Kudo, R. R. (1933). Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 52, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, R. R. (1934). Illinois Biol. Monogr. 13, 1.Google Scholar
Léger, L. & Hesse, E. (1907). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris 145, 85. Ann. Univ. Grenoble, 17, 3.Google Scholar
Nemeczek, A. (1922). Arch. Protistenk. 45, 390.Google Scholar
Noble, E. R. (1938). J. Parasit. 24, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, E. R. (1939). J. Parasit. 25, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisi, B. (1912). Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. 58, 283.Google Scholar
Poche, F. (1913). Arch. Protistenk. 30, 125.Google Scholar
Sachwatkin, V. (1935). Sci. Mem. Univ. Perm. 1 (1), 83.Google Scholar
Sachwatkin, V. (1936). Sci. Mem. Univ. Perm. 2 (3), 175.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. & Prashad, B. (1918). Rec.Indian Mus. 15, 344.Google Scholar
Thélohan, P. (1892). Bull. Soc. philom. 4, 165.Google Scholar
Thélohan, P. (1895). Bull. Sci. Fr. Belg. 26, 100.Google Scholar
Weill, R. (1929). Arch. zool. exp. gén. 69 (Note et revue), 41.Google Scholar