Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T06:26:14.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Politics of Gender Symposium Introduction: Comparative Politics and the Logics of a Comparative Politics of Gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Karen Beckwith
Karen Beckwith
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Case Western Reserve University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This symposium is the culmination of work that began in October 2007, when fourteen scholars from Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States convened at Case Western Reserve University to participate in the research conference Toward a Comparative Politics of Gender: Advancing the Discipline along Interdisciplinary Boundaries. The conference was funded by a Presidential Initiative Grant from the University and further supported by an ACES grant. Dr. Gregory Eastwood made available the Library of the Inamori Center for Ethnics and Excellence for our conference meetings. Many thanks to Linda Gilmore, Tonae Bolton-Dove, Gail Papay, Shelley White, and Sharon Skowronski for their expert administrative support. Professors Dorothy Miller (Women's Studies), Rosalind Simson (Philosophy, Law and Women's Studies), and Kelly McMann (Political Science and International Studies) served as discussants of the conference papers. To Theda Skocpol, who presented remarks at the opening dinner of the conference, and to the scholars who participated in the CPG conference and whose contributions are included in this symposium, I offer my deepest appreciation and gratitude.

What do we mean by a comparative politics of gender? How would a comparative politics of gender advance our understanding of politics generally? What would it take to develop a gendered comparative political analysis? In the essays that follow, Teri Caraway, Louise Chappell, Leslie Schwindt-Bayer, and Aili Mari Tripp elaborate their understandings of a comparative politics of gender. Five additional essays focus specifically on issues of democratization (Lisa Baldez, Georgina Waylen), political institutions and representation (Mili Caul Kittilson, Mona Lena Krook), and comparative sex equality policies (Mala Htun and Laurel Weldon). In this introductory essay, I discuss what I mean by “gender” in the context of comparative politics. Briefly enumerating the advantages of comparative politics as a subfield for a gendered analysis of political phenomena, I discuss how a comparative politics of gender can serve to advance our understanding of politics generally, and I provide an example of subfield research—the study of political violence—where gender as a metaconcept may be particularly useful. I conclude by considering what it would mean to our study of gender and of comparative politics to place gender as a central concept in comparative political research and to move to a comparative politics of gender.

Type
Symposium
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 159 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, Sonia E. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women's Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Angrist, Michele Penner. 2008. Is Gender Inequality Responsible for the Prevalence of Dictatorship in the Muslim World? APSA-CP Newsletter 19 (1): 12.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2002. Why Women Protest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. Elected Bodies: Gender Quota Laws for Legislative Candidates in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (May): 231–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2010. The Gender Lacuna in Comparative Politics. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 1992. Comparative Research and Electoral Systems: Lessons from France and Italy. Women & Politics 12 (2): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2005a. The Comparative Politics of Women's Movements: Teaching Comparatively, Learning Democracy. Perspectives on Politics 3 (3): 583–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2005b. A Common Language of Gender? Politics & Gender 1 (1): 128–37.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Elman, Colin. 2007. Qualitative methods: The view from the subfields. Comparative Political Studies 40 (2): 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caparaso, James. 2000. Comparative Politics: Diversity and Coherence. Comparative Political Studies 33 (6/7): 699–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri L. 2004. Inclusion and Democratization: Class, Gender, Race, and the Extension of Suffrage. Comparative Politics 36 (4): 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri L. 2010. Gendering Comparative Politics. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2006. Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered ‘Logic of Appropriateness.’ Politics & Gender 2 (2): 223–35.Google Scholar
Charrad, Mounira M. 2001. States and Women's Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006a. Gender and Politics: The State of the Art. Politics 26 (1): 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006b. Gender, Politics and Political Science: A Reply to Michael Moran. Politics 26 (3): 203–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, Najma, Nelson, Barbara J., Carver, with Kathryn A., Johnson, Nancy J., and O'Loughlin, Paula L.. 1994. Redefining Politics: Patterns of Women's Political Engagement from a Global Perspective. In Women and Politics Worldwide, ed. Nelson, Barbara J. and Chowdhury, Najma. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kevin A. 2007. The Necessity of Being Comparative: Theory Confirmation in Quantitative Political Science. Comparative Political Studies 40 (7): 886–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costain, Anne N. 2000. Women's Movements and Nonviolence. PS: Political Science and Politics 33 (2): 175–80.Google Scholar
Critical Perspectives on Gender, and Politics: Do Women Represent Women? Rethinking the ‘Critical Mass’ Debate. 2006. Politics & Gender 2 (4): 491–530.Google Scholar
Critical Perspectives on Gender, and Politics: Gender Quotas I. 2005. Politics & Gender 1 (4): 621–52.Google Scholar
Critical Perspectives on Gender, and Politics: Gender Quotas II. 2006. Politics & Gender 2 (1): 101–28.Google Scholar
Critical Perspectives on Gender, and Politics: Moving to a Comparative Politics of Gender? 2006. Politics & Gender 2 (2): 221–63.Google Scholar
Critical Perspectives on Gender, and Politics: Intersectionality. 2007. Politics & Gender 3 (2): 229–80.Google Scholar
Critical Perspectives on Gender, and Politics: State Feminism Reconsidered. 2007. Politics & Gender 3 (4): 499–541.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Harell, Allison, and Erickson, Bonnie H.. 2007. Network diversity and vote choice: Women's social ties and left voting in Canada. Politics & Gender 3 (2): 151–77.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantola, Johanna. 2006. Feminist Theorize the State. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantola, Johanna, and Dahl, Hanne Marlene. 2005. Gender and the State: From Differences Between to Differences Within. International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Meryl. 2007. Gender, Institutions and Power: A Critical Review. Politic 27 (2): 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1995. The Political Opportunity Structure of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization. In The Politics of Social Protest, ed. Jenkins, J. Craig and Klandermans, Bert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Giugni, Marco G.. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2010. Studying Political Representation: A Comparative-Gendered Approach. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 230–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitin, David D. 2002. Comparative Politics: The State of the Subdiscipline. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V.. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2004. Gender and Political Representation in the UK: The State of the ‘Discipline.’ British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6 (1): 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2007. Defining the State of Comparative Politics: Views from Qualitative Research. Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 32–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnaughy, Corrine M. 2007. Seeing Gender over the Short and Long Haul. Politics & Gender 3 (3): 378–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1991. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, eds. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Russo, Ann, and Torres, Lourdes. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, Michael. 2006. Gender, Identity, and the Teaching of British Politics. Politics 26 (3): 200–02.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Snyder, Richard, eds. 2007a. Passion, Craft and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Snyder, Richard. 2007b. Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics. Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Barbara J., and Chowdhury, Najma, eds. 1994. Women and Politics Worldwide. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2007. E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2): 137–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, Vicky, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2004. Gender in Contemporary British Politics. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6 (1): 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Andrew, and Seawright, Jason. 2008. “Can Electoral Laws Increase Women's Representation?” Presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 28–31.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith, and Weldes, Jutta. 2007. Beyond Being Marginal: Gender and International Relations in Britain. British Journal of Politics and International Relation 9: 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, Paul, and Lees, Charles. 2006. Politics—The State of the Art. Politics 26 (1): 1–2.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 2001. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2006. Why So Slow? The Challenges of Gendering Comparative Politics. Politics & Gender 2 (2): 249–63.Google Scholar
van Biezen, Ingrid, and Caramani, Daniele. 2006. (Non) Comparative Politics in Britain. Politics 26 (1): 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2001. Ethnic Conflict and Civil Society: India and Beyond. World Politics 53 (3): 362–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2002. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 1994. Women and Democratisation: Conceptualising Gender Relations in Transition Politics. World Politics 46 (3): 327–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2003. Gender and Transitions: What Do We Know? Democratization 10 (1): 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2007. Engendering Transitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2006. The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender. Politics & Gender 2 (2): 235–48.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Eric. 2007. No Method to the Comparative Politics Madness. Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 37–44.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1994. Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective. Signs 19 (3): 713–38.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2005. Modernity, Emancipatory Values and Power: A Rejoinder to Adams and Orloff. Politics & Gender I (3): 492–500.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 2007. Do We Understand Each Other Yet? Troubling Feminist Encounters with(in) International Relations. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9: 302–12.Google Scholar