Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T15:00:34.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Empirical Philosophy of Roger and Francis Bacon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Herbert Hochberg
Herbert Hochberg*
Affiliation:
State University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To this date Roger Bacon remains one of the controversial and colorful figures in the history of empirical science. This paper is an attempt to ascertain his views regarding the nature and function of empirical science and to compare his writings on this topic with those of the more famous Francis Bacon. The ground for comparison is the fact that both men have often been cast in the same role in the history of science; i.e., they have both been acclaimed as the first in the western world to emphasize and bring out the importance of experimental method in the accumulation of knowledge. In this connection Francis, of the sixteenth century, has long been acknowledged as the father of the experimental method in preference to Roger, of the thirteenth century. In effect, therefore, this paper probes the relative merits of the claims for each thinker.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1953 , pp. 313 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © 1953, The Williams & Wilkins Company

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bacon, F., Novum organum, ed. by J. Devey (P. F. Collier & Son, New York, 1901).Google Scholar
2. Bacon, F., The advancement of Learning, Book II, ed. by F. G. Selby (Macmillan & Co., London, 1893).Google Scholar
3. Bacon, R., Opus Majus, trans. by R. B. Burke (Univ. of Penn. Press, Philadelphia, 1928).10.9783/9781512814064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bacon, R., Part of the Opus Tertium, ed. by A. G. Little, British Society of Franciscan Studies, Vol. IV (Univ. Press, Aberdeen, 1912).Google Scholar
5. Bridges, J. H., The Life and Work of Roger Bacon (Williams & Norgate, London, 1914).Google Scholar
6. Hime, H. W. L., “Roger Bacon and Gunpowder,” in Roger Bacon: Commemoration Essays, ed. by A. G. Little (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1914).Google Scholar
7. Little, A. G., “On Roger Bacon's Life and Works,” in Roger Bacon: Commemoration Essays, ed. by A. G. Little (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1914).Google Scholar
8. Manly, J. M., “Roger Bacon and the Voynich MS,” in Speculum, Vol. VI, 1931.Google Scholar
9. Muir, M. M. Pattison, “Roger Bacon: His Relations to Alchemy and Chemistry,” in Roger Bacon: Commemoration Essays, ed. by A. G. Little (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1914).Google Scholar
10. Newbold, W. R., The Cipher of Roger Bacon, ed. by R. G. Kent, (Univ. of Penn. Press, Philadelphia, 1928).10.9783/9781512818239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Pratt, F., Secret and Urgent (Bobbs-Merrill Co., New York, 1939).Google Scholar
12. Sarton, G., Introduction to the History of Science, Vol. II, (Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1931).Google Scholar
13. Smith, D. E., “The Place of Roger Bacon in the History of Mathematics,” in Roger Bacon: Commemoration Essays, ed. by A. G. Little (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1914).Google Scholar
14. Steele, R., “Roger Bacon and the State of Science in the Thirteenth Century,” in Studies in the History and Method of Science, ed. by C. Singer, Vol. II (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1921).Google Scholar
15. Thorndike, L., A History of Magic and Experimental Science (Macmillan, New York, 1923).10.5962/bhl.title.35115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Withington, E., “Roger Bacon and Medicine,” in Roger Bacon: Commemoration Essays, ed. by A. G. Little (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1914).Google Scholar
17. Woodruff, F. Winthrop, Roger Bacon (James Clarke & Co., London).Google Scholar