Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T12:29:34.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The James-Lange Theory: A Logical Post-Mortem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Cornelius L. Golightly
Cornelius L. Golightly*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following statement from James’ 1884 essay in Mind (12) is repeated in his later work (10, pp. 100–101) and appears often in secondary sources as a summary of his celebrated theory of the emotions:

Our natural way of thinking about these standard emotions is that the mental perception of some fact excites the mental affection called the emotion, and that this latter state of mind gives rise to the bodily expression. My thesis on the contrary is that the bodily changes follow directly the Perception of the exciting fact, and that our feeling of the same changes as they occur IS the emotion. Common sense says, we lose our fortune, are sorry, and weep; we meet a bear, are frightened and run; we are insulted by a rival, are angry and strike. The hypothesis here to be defended says that this order of sequence is incorrect, that the one mental state is not immediately induced by the other, that the bodily manifestation must first be interposed between, and that the more rational statement is that we feel sorry because we cry, angry because we strike, afraid because we tremble, and not that we cry, strike, or tremble because we are sorry, angry, or fearful as the case may be. Without the bodily states following on the perception the latter would be purely cognitive in form, pale, colorless, destitute of emotional warmth. We might then see the bear and judge it best to run, receive the insult and deem it right to strike, but we would not actually feel afraid or angry.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1953 , pp. 286 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © 1953, The Williams & Wilkins Company

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Read in part at a meeting of the Acolytes, University of Michigan, December 5, 1952.

References

1. Angell, J. R. A reconsideration of James's theory of emotion in the light of recent criticisms. Psychol. Rev., 1916, 23, 251–261.10.1037/h0071254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bard, P. The neuro-humoral basis of emotional reactions. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of general experimental psychology. Worcester, Mass.: Clark Univ. Press, 1934.Google Scholar
3. Bergmann, G. An empiricist schema of the psychophysical problem. Phil. of Science, 1942, 9, 72–91.10.1086/286750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Boring, E. G. A history of experimental psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950.Google Scholar
5. Cannon, W. B. Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1929.10.1097/00007611-192909000-00037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dana, C. L. The anatomic seat of the emotions: a discussion of the James-Lange theory. Arch. New. & Psychiat., 1921, 6, 1–8.Google Scholar
7. Feigl, H. The mind-body problem in the development of logical empiricism. Rev. Internat. Phil, 1950, 11, 64–83.Google Scholar
8. Head, H. Studies in neurology. Vol. 2 London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1920.Google Scholar
9. Humphrey, G. Thinking. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1951.Google Scholar
10. James, W. The emotions. Chap. XXV in Principles of Psychology, 1890. Republished in K. Dunlay (Ed.), The Emotions. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1922.Google Scholar
11. James, W. The principles of psychology. Vol. 1, New York: Henry Holt, 1890.Google Scholar
12. James, W. What is an emotion? Mind, 1884, 19, 188–205. Republished in K. Dunlap (Ed.), The emotions. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1922.Google Scholar
13. Lange, C. The emotions. Denmark, 1885. Translated by H. Kurella. Leipzig: Theodor Thomas, 1887; retranslated by Istar A. Haupt for K. Dunlap (Ed.), The emotions. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1922.Google Scholar
14. Perry, R. B. General theory of value. New York: Longmans, Green, 1926.Google Scholar
15. Perry, R. B. The thought and character of William James. Vol. 2. Boston: Little, Brown, 1935.Google Scholar
16. Reymert, M. L. Feelings and emotions: The Mooseheart Symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.Google Scholar
17. Reymert, M. L. Feelings and Emotions: The Wittenberg Symposium. Worcester, Mass.: Clark Univ. Press, 1928.Google Scholar
18. Schlick, M. Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer, 1925.10.1007/978-3-642-50929-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sherrington, C. S. The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1906.Google Scholar
20. Watson, J. B. The new behaviorism. New York: Norton, 1930.Google Scholar
21. Watson, J. B. Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1919.10.1037/10016-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Weiss, A. P. Feeling and emotion as forms of behavior. In Reymert, M. L. (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The Wittenberg Symposium. Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press, 1928.Google Scholar
23. Wenger, M. A. Emotion as visceral action: an extension of Lange's theory. In M. L. Reymert (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The Mooseheart Symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.Google Scholar
24. Wilson, S. A. K. Modern problems in neurology, New York: Wood, 1929.Google Scholar
25. Wilson, S. A. K. Pathological laughing and crying. J Neur & Psychopathol., 1924, 4, 299–333.10.1136/jnnp.s1-4.16.299CrossRefGoogle Scholar