Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T05:23:16.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Myth, Morals, and Metafiction in Jonathan Littell's Les Bienveillantes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Jonas Grethlein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jonathan Littell's Les Bienveillantes, the fictional autobiography of an incestuous SS officer, is one of the most controversial novels published in the last decade: it received two prestigious French literary awards but was denounced as kitschy, pornographic, and revisionist. This essay explores the intertext of the Oresteia, which makes the book more complex than most critics have acknowledged. The references to Aeschylus permit the narrator to style himself a tragic hero and thereby to trivialize the Nazi crimes. At the same time, the mythical emplotment, together with other intertexts, indicates that Aue's account is a concoction. Far from simply propagating a revisionist ideology, Les Bienveillantes combines much factual information with a high degree of reflexivity, provoking readers to ponder the Shoah and how to do justice to it.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 127 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 77 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aeschylus. Aeschyli Tragoediae: Cum incerti poetae Prometheo. Ed. West, Martin L. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice. Faux pas. Paris: Gallimard, 1975. Print.Google Scholar
Elias, Amy J. Sublime Desire: History and Post-1960s Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Elsner, Jaś. Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Engler, Bernd, and Müller, Kurt, eds. Historiographic Metafiction in Modern American and Canadian Literature. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “La pensée du dehors.” Dits et écrits. Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard, 2001. 546–67. Print.Google Scholar
Frick, Werner. ‘Die mythische Methode.‘ Komparatistische Studien zur Transformation der griechischen Tragödie im Drama der klassischen Moderne. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1998. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, Simon. Reading Greek Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilmann, Ann, and Llewellyn, Mark, eds. Metafiction and Metahistory in Contemporary Women's Writing. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husson, Édouard. “Les Bienveillantes, un canular déplacé.” Le Figaro 8 Nov. 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. London: Routledge, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Lanzmann, Claude. “Lanzmann juge Les Bienveillantes.” Le nouvel observateur 21–27 Sept. 2006: 14. Print.Google Scholar
Lermontov, Mikhail J. A Hero of Our Time. Trans. Nabokov, V. Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Littell, Jonathan. Les Bienveillantes. Paris: Gallimard, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Littell, Jonathan. “Brief an meine Übersetzer I.” Littell, Die Wohlgesinnten 5–12.Google Scholar
Littell, Jonathan. “Brief an meine Übersetzer II.” Littell, Die Wohlgesinnten 13–14.Google Scholar
Littell, Jonathan. “Conversation sur l'histoire et le roman.” By Pierre Nora. Le débat 144 (2007): 25–44. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littell, Jonathan. The Kindly Ones. Trans. Mandell, Charlotte. New York: Harper, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Littell, Jonathan. Die Wohlgesinnten: Marginalien. Trans. Altwegg, Jürg et al. Berlin: Berlin, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Meier, Christian. Die Entstehung des Politischen bei den Griechen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Daniel Adam. “Transgression.” New York Review of Books 26 Mar. 2009: 18–20. Print.Google Scholar
Mercier-Leca, Florence. “Les Bienveillantes et la tragédie grecque. Une suite macabre à L'Orestie d'Eschyle.” Le débat 144 (2007): 45–55. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nivat, Georges. “Les Bienveillantes et les classiques russes.” Le débat 144 (2007): 56–65. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünning, Ansgar. “Beyond the Great Story: Der postmoderne historische Roman als Medium revisionistischer Geschichtsdarstellung, kultureller Erinnerung und metahistoriographischer Reflexion.” Anglia 117 (1999): 15–48. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünning, Ansgar. Von historischer Fiktion zu historiographischer Metafiktion. 2 vols. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Onega, Susana. Telling Histories: Narrativizing History, Historicizing Literature. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Ovidius Naso, P. Metamorphoses. Ed. Tarrant, Richard J. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Der Begriff des Politischen. Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien. Berlin: Duncker, 1963. Print.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Politische Theologie. Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. 3rd ed. Berlin: Duncker, 1979. Print.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan Rubin. “When the Perpetrator Becomes a Reliable Witness of the Holocaust: On Jonathan Littell's Les Bienveillantes.” New German Critique 106 (2009): 1–19. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar