Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-13T15:04:07.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Say First What Cause”: Ricoeur and the Etiology of Evil in Paradise Lost

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

John S. Tanner
John S. Tanner*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paradise Lost traces evil through three inceptions—Satanic, Adamic, and historical. Each origin seems to envision a different etiology: Satanic evil springs exclusively from the self in an instant of radical “Pelagian” freedom. Adamic evil emerges from the ambiguous interplay between self and seductive environment. Historical evil contaminates the whole race by means of necessary “Augustinian” inheritance. Ricoeur's analysis of the “Adamic Myth” and original sin clarifies etiological traditions Milton assimilates from Christian symbol, myth, and dogma. Through Ricoeur, we can identify the contrasting modalities of evil (inherited and imitative, physical and moral, ontological and existential, necessary and free, communal and individual) fused in Paradise Lost. Ricoeur's work reveals Milton's text to be a subtly inclusive etiological myth, one whose complex genesis of evil recovers Scripture's fullness of meaning in a new mythopoesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 45 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bell, Millicent. “The Fallacy of the Fall in Paradise Lost.” PMLA 68 (1953): 863–83.10.2307/459803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessington, Francis C. Paradise Lost and the Classical Epic. London: Routledge, 1979.Google Scholar
Broadbent, J. B. Some Graver Subject: An Essay on Paradise Lost. London: Chatto, 1960.Google Scholar
Burden, Dennis. The Logical Epic: A Study of the Argument of Paradise Lost. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1967.Google Scholar
Crosman, Robert. Reading Paradise Lost. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Danielson, Dennis Richard. Milton's Good God: A Study in Literary Theodicy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1982.10.1017/CBO9780511735646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demaray, John G. Milton's Theatrical Epic: The Invention and Design of Paradise Lost. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Diekhoff, John S. “Eve's Dream and the Paradox of Fallible Perfection.” Milton Quarterly 4.1 (1970): 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. M. Paradise Lost and the Genesis Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon, 1968.Google Scholar
Ferry, Anne Davidson. Milton's Epic Voice: The Narrator in Paradise Lost. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1963.Google Scholar
Fiore, Peter A. “Augustine.” A Milton Encyclopedia. Ed. Hunter, William B. Jr. 9 vols. Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 1978–83.Google Scholar
Fiore, Peter A. Milton and Augustine: Patterns of Augustinian Thought in Paradise Lost. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Surpris'd by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost. 1967. Berkeley: U of California P, 1971.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Trans. Lewin, Jane E. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. K. Paradise Lost. Unwin Critical Library. London: Allen, 1980.Google Scholar
Kelley, Maurice. This Great Argument: A Study of Milton's De Doctrina Christiana as a Gloss upon Paradise Lost. Gloucester: Smith, 1962.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Christopher. Milton: A Study in Ideology and Form. New York: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, William. The Sacred Complex: On the Psychogenesis of Paradise Lost. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S⊘ren. The Concept of Dread. Trans. Lowrie, Walter. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1957.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara K. “Innocence and Experience in Milton's Eden.” New Essays on Paradise Lost. Ed. Kranidas, Thomas. Berkeley: U of California P, 1971. 86–117.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara K. Paradise Lost and the Rhetoric of Literary Forms. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1985.10.1515/9781400853953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieb, Michael. “Milton's ‘Dramatic Constitution’: The Celestial Dialogue in Paradise Lost, Book III.” Milton Studies 23 (1987), forthcoming.Google Scholar
MacCaffrey, Isabel G. Paradise Lost as “Myth.” Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1959.10.4159/harvard.9780674421431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McColley, Diane. “Free Will and Obedience in the Separation Scene of Paradise Lost.” Studies in English Literature 12 (1972): 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, John. De Doctrina Christiana. Ed. Hanford, James Holly and Dunn, Waldo Hilary. Trans. Sumner, Charles R. New York: Columbia UP, 1933–34. Vols. 14–16 of The Works of John Milton. Ed. Frank A. Patterson. 18 vols. 1931–38.Google Scholar
Milton, John. John Milton: The Complete Poems and Major Prose. Ed. Hughes, Merritt Y. Indianapolis: Odyssey, 1957.Google Scholar
Mollenkott, Virginia R. “Original Sin.” A Milton Encyclopedia. Ed. Hunter, William B. Jr. 9 vols. Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 1979–83.Google Scholar
Nyquist, Mary. “Gynesis, Genesis, Exegesis, and Milton's Eve.” Cannibals, Witches, and Divorce: Estranging the Renaissance. Ed. Garber, Marjorie. Selected Papers from the English Institute ns 11 (1985). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1987. 147–208.Google Scholar
Nyquist, Mary. “Reading the Fall: Discourse in Drama in Paradise Lost.” English Literary Renaissance 14 (1984): 199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, H. V. S. “The Crisis of Paradise Lost Reconsidered.” Philological Quarterly 36 (1957): 1–19.Google Scholar
Patrides, C. A. Milton and the Christian Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon, 1966.Google Scholar
Peter, John. A Critique of Paradise Lost. London: Longmans, 1960.Google Scholar
Quilligan, Maureen. Milton's Spenser: The Politics of Reading. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Reichert, John. “‘Against His Better Knowledge’: A Case for Adam.” ELH 48 (1981): 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revard, Stella. The War in Heaven: Paradise Lost and the Tradition of Satan's Rebellion. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. “‘Original Sin’: A Study in Meaning.” The Conflict of Interpretation. Trans. McCormick, Peter. Ed. Ihde, Don. Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1974. 269–86.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. The Symbolism of Evil. Trans. Buchanan, Emerson. Boston: Beacon, 1967.Google Scholar
Summers, Joseph H. The Muse's Method: An Introduction to Paradise Lost. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1962.Google Scholar
Tanner, John S. “The Dreadful Garden: Paradise Lost and The Concept of Dread.” Diss. U of California, Berkeley, 1980.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W. Studies in Milton. London: Chatto, 1951.Google Scholar
Waldock, A. J. A. Paradise Lost and Its Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1947.Google Scholar
Webber, Joan Mallory. Milton and His Epic Tradition. Seattle: U of Washington P, 1979.Google Scholar