Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T00:44:20.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tracing Shoah

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Robert Brinkley  and
Steven Youra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is often said that the Shoah cannot be represented. But viewers can learn from Claude Lanzmann's film Shoah how the events referred to as the Shoah produce a reference to themselves. The film presents a montage of encounters, of unanticipated details discovered in filming, of instances selected and arranged as openings to other encounters not included in Shoah. Through careful choreography, the film invites the return of signs from the past. Shoah offers a way of seeing and invites encounters that—like the filmmaker's arrangements—are open to the force of evidence as that evidence constrains interpretative response. Lanzmann's stance, an openness to significance that precedes interpretation, provides a model for a viewer's relationship to Shoah and its material, to the otherness that addresses the audience through the film. In tracing what can be traced and in filming what can be witnessed, Shoah can turn spectators into producers in the work of bearing witness.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 111 , Issue 1: Special Topic The Status of Evidence , January 1996 , pp. 108 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Benjamin, Walter “The Author as Producer.” Reflections. Trans. Jephcott, Edmund. Ed. Demetz, Peter. New York: Harcourt, 1978. 220–22.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter “Geschichtsphilosophische Thesen.” Illuminationen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1969. 268–26.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter “N [Theoretics of Knowledge; Theory of Progress].” Philosophical Forum 15.1-2(1983-84): 1–40.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter “Theses on the Philosophy of History.” Illuminations. Trans. Zohn, Harry. Ed. Arendt, Hannah. New York: Schocken, 1969. 253–25.Google Scholar
Czerniakow, Adam. The Warsaw Diary of Adam Czerniakow. Trans. Staron, Stanislaw and the staff of Yad Vashem. Ed. Raul Hilberg, Staron, and Kermisz, Josef. New York: Stein, 1979.Google Scholar
Des Pres, Terrence. The Survivor: Anatomy of Life in the Death Camps. New York: Oxford UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, and Laub, Dori. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Forché, Carolyn. The Country between Us. New York: Harper, 1981.Google Scholar
Hilberg, Raul. The Destruction of the European Jews. 3 vols. New York: Holmes, 1985.Google Scholar
Hilberg, Raul. Conversation. 10 Apr. 1988.Google Scholar
Kogon, Eugen, et al Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas: Eine Dokumentation. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1983.Google Scholar
Lanzmann, Claude “Intervention de Claude Lanzmann.” Mémoire et histoire: Actes du XXVe Colloque des Intellectuels Juifs de Langue Française. Paris: Denoel, 1986. 72–75.Google Scholar
Lanzmann, Claude “On Making Controversial Films.” Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY. 26 Apr. 1995.Google Scholar
Lanzmann, Claude “Seminar with Claude Lanzmann, 11 April 1990.” Transcribed by Ruth Larson. Ed. David Rodowick. Yale French Studies 79 (1991): 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzmann, Claude “Shoah.” Interview with Roger Rosenblatt. PBS. 27–30 Apr. 1987.Google Scholar
Lanzmann, Claude, dir Shoah. New Yorker Films, 1985.Google Scholar
Lanzmann, Claude. Shoah. New York: Pantheon, 1985.Google Scholar
Lanzmann, Claude. Shoah. Paris: Fayard, 1985.Google Scholar
Lanzmann, Claude “Why Spielberg Has Distorted the Truth.” Guardian Weekly 3 Apr. 1994: 14.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo. The Drowned and the Saved. Trans. Rosenthal, Raymond. New York: Summit, 1986.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo. Survival in Auschwitz. Trans. Woolf, Stuart. New York: Collier, 1961.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel, and Kearney, Richard “Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas.” Face to Face with Levinas. Ed. Cohen, Richard A. Albany: State U of New York P, 1986. 13–33.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. Heidegger and “the jews.” Trans. Michel, Andreas and Roberts, Mark. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1990.Google Scholar
Müller, Filip, with Freitag, Helmut. Eyewitness Auschwitz. Trans. Flatauer, Susanne. New York: Stein, 1979.Google Scholar
Noakes, Jeremy, and Pridham, Geoffrey, eds Documents on Nazism, 1919-1945. London: Cape, 1974.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. Elements of Logic: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 2. Ed. Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1931.Google Scholar
Steiner, George “The Long Life of Metaphor: An Approach to ‘the Shoah.‘” Encounter 67 (1987): 55–61.Google Scholar