Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Heinrich, Tobias
and
Witko, Christopher
2022.
Technology Threats to Employment, Issues, and Candidate and Party Preferences in the United States.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 3,
p.
797.
Kubo, Yoshiaki
and
Okada, Isamu
2022.
COVID-19 health certification reduces outgroup bias: evidence from a conjoint experiment in Japan.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
Ne’eman, Ari
Bell, Elizabeth
Schneider, Monica C.
and
Strolovitch, Dara
2022.
Identifying And Exploring Bias In Public Opinion On Scarce Resource Allocation During The COVID-19 Pandemic.
Health Affairs,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 10,
p.
1513.
Levatino, Antonina
2022.
What do exchange students value when choosing a destination for their study period abroad? A conjoint experiment.
Globalisation, Societies and Education,
p.
1.
Farkas, Attila
Kovarek, Daniel
and
Farkas, Eszter
2022.
Last Place Aversion, Labor Market Competition or Welfare State Model? Explaining Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Hungary with a Conjoint Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
FREDERIKSEN, KRISTIAN VREDE SKAANING
2022.
Does Competence Make Citizens Tolerate Undemocratic Behavior?.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 116,
Issue. 3,
p.
1147.
Abramson, Scott F.
Kocak, Korhan
and
Magazinnik, Asya
2022.
What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments?.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 4,
p.
1008.
Doherty, David
2022.
What Can Conjoint Experiments Tell Us about Americans’ Abortion Attitudes?.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 2,
p.
147.
Carnahan, Dustin
Ulusoy, Ezgi
Barry, Rachel
McGraw, Johnny
Virtue, Isabel
and
Bergan, Daniel E
2022.
What should I believe? A conjoint analysis of the influence of message characteristics on belief in, perceived credibility of, and intent to share political posts.
Journal of Communication,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 5,
p.
592.
Zhao, Anqi
and
Ding, Peng
2022.
Regression-based causal inference with factorial experiments: estimands, model specifications and design-based properties.
Biometrika,
Vol. 109,
Issue. 3,
p.
799.
Tanaka, Ayumu
Ito, Banri
and
Jinji, Naoto
2022.
Individual Preferences Toward Inward Foreign Direct Investment: A Conjoint Survey Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Al-Omari, Basem
Farhat, Joviana
and
Ershaid, Mai
2022.
Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients’ Preferences and Personalize Care.
Journal of Personalized Medicine,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
274.
Ward, Peter
and
Denney, Steven
2022.
Welfare chauvinism among co‐ethnics: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in South Korea.
International Migration,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 5,
p.
74.
Bergan, Daniel E.
Finerty, Caitlin
Harrison, Jack
Ma, Siyuan
and
Virtue, Isabel
2023.
Can People Use Party Cues to Assess Policymaker Positions? Ecological Rationality and Political Heuristics.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 3,
p.
1502.
Liu, Guoer
and
Shiraito, Yuki
2023.
Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Conjoint Analysis.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
380.
Harris, Adam S.
and
Honig, Lauren
2023.
Mutual Dependence and Expectations of Cooperation.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 85,
Issue. 1,
p.
192.
Howard, Amy
and
Wehde, Wesley
2023.
Bringing the Ts and (N)Bs to the Table: Estimating Intersectional Candidate Gender Identity and Sexuality Effects on Vote Choice.
Journal of Women, Politics & Policy,
p.
1.
Eshima, Shusei
Horiuchi, Yusaku
Kuriwaki, Shiro
and
Smith, Daniel M.
2023.
Winning Elections with Unpopular Policies: Valence Advantage and Single-Party Dominance in Japan.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Frederiksen, Kristian Vrede Skaaning
and
Skaaning, Svend-Erik
2023.
Do Citizens Tolerate Antidemocratic Statements?.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 84,
Issue. ,
p.
102652.
Blackwell, Matthew
and
Pashley, Nicole E.
2023.
Noncompliance and Instrumental Variables for 2K Factorial Experiments.
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
Vol. 118,
Issue. 542,
p.
1102.