Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T11:00:42.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Objecting to the Genetic Virtue Program: Premises, tradeoffs, and science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Jamie Bronstein*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Breland Hall, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003 jbronste@nmsu.edu
Get access

Extract

The Enlightenment bequeathed to us the notion that the human mind can and should dominate over nature—that there is nothing we cannot know or should not attempt. And, in fact, there is something to be said for this position, since a truthful historian has to admit that standards of living have generally been greatly bettered by the technology of the last two centuries. Without confidence in our ability to remake nature, the great medical advances of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries would never have been possible: antisepsis, the discovery of the tuberculosis bacillus, sulfa drugs, the polio vaccine. Like twentieth-century researchers who faced polio and smallpox, Mark Walker has perhaps identified the central ethical malady of our twenty-first century civilization—how the lack of virtue impedes our moral progress. And just as biological researchers sought to use science to eradicate these diseases, so Walker seeks to use genetic manipulation to eradicate evil.

Type
Forum: Genetic virtue, reconsidered
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Walker, Mark, “Enhancing genetic virtue: A project for twenty-first century humanity?” Politics and the Life Sciences 2009, 28(2): 2747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Trut, Lyudmila N., “Early canid domestication: The farm fox experiment,” American Scientist 1999, 87: 160169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hooker, Brad, “Does being virtuous constitute a benefit to the agent?” in How Should One Live? Crisp, Roger ed. (Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 141155.Google Scholar
4.Owen, On Robert, seeClaeys, Gregory ed., A New View of Society (London: Penguin Books, 1991), first published 1813–1816, pp. 192.Google Scholar
5.See, for example, the social experiment being run by Geoffrey Canada, the Harlem Children's Zone, in Brooks, David, “The Harlem Miracle,” New York Times May 9, 2009, p. A31.Google Scholar
6.Weiss, Shiela Faith, “The race hygiene movement in Germany,” Osiris, 2nd ser. 1987, 3: 193236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Scott, James, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
8.Scott, , p. 89.Google Scholar