Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T05:06:09.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can the “Golden Hour of Shock” Safely Be Extended in Blunt Polytrauma Patients? Prospective Cohort Study at a Level I Hospital in Eastern Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Joseph J. Osterwalder
Joseph J. Osterwalder*
Affiliation:
Emergency Department, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
*
Head Emergency Department, Cantonal Hospital, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland E-mail: joseph.osterwalder@kssg.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

The objective was to test, in this trauma system, the North American hypothesis that exceeding the 60-minute limit for the entire prehospital time (“golden hour of shock”) increases mortality of blunt polytrauma patients.

Methods:

In a prospective, observational, cohort study conducted between 1990 and 1996, a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) score was used to compare the actual mortality with the predicted mortality in 107 blunt polytrauma patients (Group 1) with prehospital rescue periods ≤60 minutes (time from accident until arrival at the emergency department). The same comparison was performed for 147 blunt polytrauma patients (Group 2) with rescue periods >60 minutes. Inclusion criteria were blunt trauma of at least two body sites, an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of ≥8, and direct admission to the trauma centre. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to test for bias and confounding, and to identify factors that might influence mortality. Odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

Results:

The mortality in Group 1 was 14%, and was not statisticvally significantly higher than the 10.2% observed for Group 2. 4.8 patients, or 47% more than predicted, died in Group 1 (p = 0.057). The corresponding figures in Group 2 were 4.2 patients or 22% fewer than predicted (p = 0.19). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed this trend with a significant mortality odds ratio of 8 (95% CI 1.7 to 38.5) for Group 1 compared to Group 2. Significantly more patients in Group 2 were treated by emergency physicians.

Conclusions:

It appears in this trauma system, in which emergency physicians often are deployed, that the ‘golden hour of shock’ can be extended safely in many blunt polytrauma patients, since this was associated with better survival figures than in those patients for whom the time was <1 hour.

Keywords

Blunt polytraumacohort studyEastern Switzerland“golden hour of shock,”prehospital time
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 75 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Committee on Trauma. American College of Surgeons. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient: 1993. ACS, Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, USA 1993.Google Scholar
2. West, JG, Trunkey, DD, Lim, RC: Systems of trauma care. Arch Surg 1979; 114: 455–460.Google Scholar
3. Trunkey, DD: Trauma: The first hour. Emerg Med 1984; 93–107.Google Scholar
4. Trunkey, DD: Towards optimal trauma care. Arch Emerg Med 1985; 2: 181–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Spaite, DW, Criss, EA, Valenzuela, TD, Meislin, HW: Prehospital advanced life support for major trauma: Critical need for clinical trials. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 32(4):480–489.Google Scholar
6. Pepe, PE, Wyatt, CH, Bickell, WH, Bailey, ML, Mattox, KL: The relationship between total prehospital time and outcome in hypotensive victims of penetrating injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16: 293/85–297/89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Reines, HD, Bartlett, RL, Chudy, NE, Kiragu, KR, McKnew, MA: Is advanced life support appropriate for victims of motor vehicle accidents: The South Carolina Highway Trauma Project. J Trauma 1988;28(5):563–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Cayten, G, Longmore, W, Kuehl, A, Gifford, B: Prolongation of scene time by advanced life support (ALS) in an urban setting. J Trauma 1986;25(7):679.Google Scholar
9. Sampalis, JS, Lavoie, A, Williams, JI, Mulder, DS, Kalina, M: Standardised mortality ratio analysis on a sample of severely injured patients from a large Canadian city without regionalized trauma care. J Trauma 1992;33(2):205–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Sampalis, JS, Lavoie, A, Williams, JI, Mulder, DS, Kalina, M: Impact of on-site-care, prehospital time, and level of in-hospital care on survival in severly injured patients. J Trauma 1993;34(2):252–261.Google Scholar
11. Sampalis, JS, Lavoie, A, Salas, M, Nikolis, A, Williams, JI: Determinants of on-scene time in injured patients treated by physicians at the site. Prehosp Disast Med 1994;9(3):178–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Sampalis, JS, Denis, R, Lavoie, A, Tréchette, P, et al : Trauma care regionaliza-tion: A process-outcome evaluation. J Trauma 1999;46(4):565–581.Google Scholar
13. Liberman, M, Mulder, D, Sampalis, JS., Advanced or basic life support for trauma: Meta-analysis and critical review of the literature. J Trauma 2000;40(4):584–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Petri, RW, Dyer, A, Lumpkin, J: The Effect of prehospital transport time on the mortality from traumatic injury. Prehosp Disast Med 1995; 10(1): 43/24–48/29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Champion, HR, Copes, WS, Sacco, WJ, Lawnick, MM, Bain, LW, Gann, DS, Gennarelli, T, Mackenzie, E, Schwaitzberg, S: A new characterisation of injury severity. J Trauma 1990;30(5):539–545.Google Scholar
16. Osterwalder, JJ: Could a regional trauma system in eastern Switzerland decrease the mortality of blunt polytrauma patients? J Trauma 2002; 52(6): 1030–1036.Google Scholar
17. Systat 8.03. Statistics. SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL 1999.Google Scholar
18. Flora, JD: A method for comparing survival of burn patients to a standard survival curve. J Trauma 1978;18(10):701–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Hedges, JR, Feero, S, Moore, B, Shultz, B, Haver, DW: Factors contributing to paramedic onscene time during evaluation and management of blunt trauma. Am J Emerg Med 1988;6(5):443–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Jones, SE, Brennes, AT: Study design in prehospital trauma advanced life support-basic life support research: A critical review. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:857–860.Google Scholar
21. Rhodes, M, Sacco, W, Smith, S, Boorse, D: Cost effectiveness of trauma quality assurance audit filters. J Trauma 1990 Jun;30(6):724–727.Google Scholar
22. American Association of Neurological Surgery: Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. Brain Trauma Foundation 1995.Google Scholar
23. Chesnut, RM, Marshall, LF, Klauber, MR, et al: The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma 1993; 34(2):216–222.Google Scholar
24. Green, SM, Rothrock, SG: Is pediatric trauma really a surgical disease? Ann Emerg Med 2002 May; 39(5):537–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed