Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T23:11:00.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Certification Matters: A Comparative Performance Analysis of Combat Application Tourniquets versus Non-Certified CAT Look-Alike Tourniquets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2023

Emanuele Lagazzi*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Lombardia, Italy Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts USA Italian Trauma League ODV, Genova, Italy
Giulia Ballardini
Affiliation:
Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics, and Systems Engineering, University of Genova, Genova, Italy Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart, Germany
Alberto Drogo
Affiliation:
Italian Trauma League ODV, Genova, Italy School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
Ludovica Viola
Affiliation:
Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics, and Systems Engineering, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
Eva Marrone
Affiliation:
Italian Trauma League ODV, Genova, Italy School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
Valerio Valente
Affiliation:
Italian Trauma League ODV, Genova, Italy Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Michele Bonetti
Affiliation:
Italian Trauma League ODV, Genova, Italy Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, University Hospital of the University of Freiburg - Division of Anesthesia and Intensive - Emergency and Pain Medicine Villingen-Schwenningen, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Jarone Lee
Affiliation:
Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts USA
David R. King
Affiliation:
Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts USA
Serena Ricci
Affiliation:
Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics, and Systems Engineering, University of Genova, Genova, Italy Simulation and Advanced Education Center, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy
*
Correspondence: Emanuele Lagazzi, MD Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care Massachusetts General Hospital 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810 Boston, Massachusetts 02114 USA E-mail: elagazzi@mgh.harvard.edu

Abstract

Introduction:

The Stop the Bleed campaign provided civilians with tourniquet application training and increased the demand for tourniquets among the general population, which led to the development of new commercially available devices. However, most widely available tourniquets have not undergone testing by regulatory bodies and their efficacy remains unknown.

Study Objective:

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and performance of Combat Application Tourniquets (CAT) versus uncertified tourniquets.

Methods:

This study compared 25 CAT with 50 commercially available “look-alike” tourniquets (LA-TQ) resembling the CAT. The CAT and the LA-TQ were compared for cost, size, and tested during one-hour and six-hour applications on a manikin’s leg. The outcomes were force applied, force variation during the application, and tourniquet rupture rate.

Results:

The LA-TQ were cheaper (US$6.07 versus US$27.19), shorter, and had higher inter-device variability than the CAT (90.1 [SE = 0.5] cm versus 94.5 [SE = 0.1] cm; P <.001). The CAT applied a significantly greater force during the initial application when compared to the LA-TQ (65 [SE = 3] N versus 14 [SE = 1] N; P <.001). While the initial application force was maintained for up to six hours in both groups, the CAT group applied an increased force during one-hour applications (group effect: F [1,73] = 105.65; P <.001) and during six-hour applications (group effect: F [1,12] = 9.79; P = .009). The rupture rate differed between the CAT and the LA-TQ (0% versus 4%).

Conclusion:

The LA-TQ applied a significantly lower force and had a higher rupture rate compared to the CAT, potentially affecting tourniquet performance in the context of public bleeding control. These findings warrant increased layperson education within the framework of the Stop the Bleed campaign and further investigations on the effectiveness of uncertified devices in real-world applications.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Note: Drs. E. Lagazzi and G. Ballardini contributed equally to this manuscript.

References

Eastridge, BJ, Holcomb, JB, Shackelford, S. Outcomes of traumatic hemorrhagic shock and the epidemiology of preventable death from injury. Transfusion (Paris). 2019;59(S2):14231428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richey, SL. Tourniquets for the control of traumatic hemorrhage: a review of the literature. World J Emerg Surg. 2007;2(1):28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galante, JM. Using tourniquets to stop bleeding. JAMA. 2017;317(14):1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kragh, JF, Littrel, ML, Jones, JA, et al. Battle casualty survival with emergency tourniquet use to stop limb bleeding. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(6):590597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, AA, Ochoa, JE, Wong, S, et al. Prehospital tourniquet use in penetrating extremity trauma: decreased blood transfusions and limb complications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;86(1):4351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Covey, DC, Gentchos, CE. Field tourniquets in an austere military environment: a prospective case series. Injury. 2022;53(10):32403247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C, Porter, KM, Hodgetts, TJ. Tourniquet use in the civilian prehospital setting. Emerg Med J. 2007;24(8):584587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shackelford, SA, Butler, FK Jr, Kragh, JF Jr, et al. Optimizing the use of limb tourniquets in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: TCCC Guidelines Change 14-02. J Special Ops Med. 2015;15(1):1731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mawhinney, AC, Kirk, SJ. A systematic review of the use of tourniquets and topical hemostatic agents in conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Journal of the Royal Navy Medical Service. 2015;101(2):147154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latina, R, Iacorossi, L, Fauci, A, et al. Effectiveness of prehospital tourniquet in emergency patients with major trauma and uncontrolled hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(23):12861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eilertsen, KA, Winberg, M, Jeppesen, E, Hval, G, Wisborg, T. Prehospital tourniquets in civilians: a systematic review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021;36(1):8694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inaba, K, Siboni, S, Resnick, S, et al. Tourniquet use for civilian extremity trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(2):232237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teixeira, PGR, Brown, CVR, Emigh, B, et al. Civilian prehospital tourniquet use is associated with improved survival in patients with peripheral vascular injury. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(5):769776e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, TE, Baer, DG, Goolsby, C. The giving back. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(1):166167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
JEMS Staff. What the White House’s Stop the Bleed Campaign Means for EMS. https://www.jems.com/patientcare/trauma/what-the-white-house-s-stop-the-bleed-campaignmeans-for-ems/. Accessed February 26, 2023.Google Scholar
Goolsby, C, Jacobs, L, Hunt, RC, et al. Stop the Bleed Education Consortium: education program content and delivery recommendations. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(1):205210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stop the Bleed Program. https://www.stopthebleed.org/. Accessed February 24, 2023.Google Scholar
Pegues, J. Beware: counterfeit tourniquets could cost lives. CBS news. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/counterfeit-tourniquets-could-cause-catastrophic-consequences/. August 13, 2015. Accessed April 5, 2023.Google Scholar
Kragh, JF, Burrows, S, Wasner, C, et al. Analysis of recovered tourniquets from casualties of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation New Dawn. Mil Med. 2013;178(7):806810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarty, JC, Hashmi, ZG, Herrera-Escobar, JP, et al. Effectiveness of the American College of Surgeons Bleeding Control Basic Training among laypeople applying different tourniquet types. JAMA Surgery. 2019;154(10):923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stop the Bleed Program. https://www.bleedingkits.org/all-products.html. Accessed February 24, 2023.Google Scholar
European Commission. EUDAMED- European Database on Medical Devices. https://ec.europa.eu/tools/eudamed/#/screen/home. Accessed March 5, 2023.Google Scholar
TUV Rheinland. Certipedia - Certificate Database from TÜV Rheinland. https://www.certipedia.com/?locale=en. Accessed March 1, 2023.Google Scholar
US Food and Drug Administration. Devices@FDA catalog of cleared and approved medical devices. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/devicesatfda/index.cfm. Accessed March 7, 2023.Google Scholar
Viola, L, Lagazzi, E, Ballardini, G, et al. Design of a system to detect the force applied by tourniquets in a manikin’s limb. 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2021:5019-5022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weppner, J, Lang, M, Sunday, R, Debiasse, N. Efficacy of tourniquets exposed to the Afghanistan combat environment stored in individual first aid kits versus on the exterior of plate carriers. Mil Med. 2013;178(3):334337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, G. A Two-step approach for transforming continuous variables to normal: implications and recommendations for IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2011;28:4158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, JS, Satahoo, SS, Butler, FK, et al. An analysis of prehospital deaths. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(2):213218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polston, RW, Clumpner, BR, Kragh, JF, Jones, JA, Dubick, MA, Billings, S. No slackers in tourniquet use to stop bleeding. J Special Ops Med. 2013;13(2):12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baruch, EN, Kragh, JF, Berg, AL, et al. Confidence–competence mismatch and reasons for failure of non-medical tourniquet users. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017;21(1):3945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nachman, D, Benov, A, Shovali, A, et al. Slack reducing band improves Combat Application Tourniquet pressure profile and hemorrhage control rate. Mil Med. 2017;182(S1):5358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, DR, Larentzakis, A, Ramly, EP. Tourniquet use at the Boston Marathon bombing. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(3):594599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauvar, DS, Dubick, MA, Walters, TJ, Kragh, JF. Systematic review of prehospital tourniquet use in civilian limb trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(5):819825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, DR, van der Wilden, GM, Kragh, JF, Blackbourne, LH. Forward assessment of 79 prehospital battlefield tourniquets used in the current war. J Special Ops Med. 2012;12(4):33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikdad, S, Mokhtari, AK, Luckhurst, CM, et al. Implications of the national Stop the Bleed campaign: the swinging pendulum of prehospital tourniquet application in civilian limb trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(2):352360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, C, Churchill, T, Clauser, CE, et al. Anthropometric Survey of US Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics, Final Report October 1, 1988 to March 24, 1989. Natick, Massachusetts, US Army Natick Research Development and Engineering Center, OH. Published online March 1, 1988. Accessed April 5, 2023.Google Scholar
Stierman, B, Afful, J, Carrol, M, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 Pre-pandemic Data Files Development of Files and Prevalence Estimates for Selected Health Outcomes. National Center for Health Statistics (US). https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/106273. 2021; NHSR No. 158. Accessed April 5, 2023.Google Scholar