Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-19T11:11:02.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of the Christchurch Earthquakes on Hospital Staff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2013

Pleayo Tovaranonte  and
Tom J. Cawood
Pleayo Tovaranonte
Affiliation:
Department of General Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
Tom J. Cawood*
Affiliation:
Department of General Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand Departments of General Medicine and Endocrinology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
*
Correspondence: Tom J. Cawood, FRACP, PhD Departments of General Medicine and Endocrinology Christchurch Hospital Christchurch, New Zealand E-mail tom.cawood@cdhb.govt.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

On September 4, 2010 a major earthquake caused widespread damage, but no loss of life, to Christchurch city and surrounding areas. There were numerous aftershocks, including on February 22, 2011 which, in contrast, caused substantial loss of life and major damage to the city. The research aim was to assess how these two earthquakes affected the staff in the General Medicine Department at Christchurch Hospital.

Problem

To date there have been no published data assessing the impact of this type of natural disaster on hospital staff in Australasia.

Methods

A questionnaire that examined seven domains (demographics, personal impact, psychological impact, emotional impact, impact on care for patients, work impact, and coping strategies) was handed out to General Medicine staff and students nine days after the September 2010 earthquake and 14 days after the February 2011 earthquake.

Results

Response rates were ≥ 99%. Sixty percent of responders were <30 years of age, and approximately 60% were female. Families of eight percent and 35% had to move to another place due to the September and February earthquakes, respectively. A fifth to a third of people had to find an alternative route of transport to get to work but only eight percent to 18% took time off work. Financial impact was more severe following the February earthquake, with 46% reporting damage of >NZ $1,000, compared with 15% following the September earthquake (P < .001). Significantly more people felt upset about the situation following the February earthquake than the September earthquake (42% vs 69%, P < .001). Almost a quarter thought that quality of patient care was affected in some way following the September earthquake but this rose to 53% after the February earthquake (12/53 vs 45/85, P < .001). Half believed that discharges were delayed following the September earthquake but this dropped significantly to 15% following the February earthquake (27/53 vs 13/62, P < .001).

Conclusion

This survey provides a measure of the result of two major but contrasting Christchurch earthquakes upon General Medicine hospital staff. The effect was widespread with minor financial impact during the first but much more during the second earthquake. Moderate psychological impact was experienced in both earthquakes. This data may be useful to help prepare plans for future natural disasters.

TovaranonteP, CawoodTJ. Impact of the Christchurch Earthquakes on Hospital Staff. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(3):1-6.

Keywords

earthquakesfinanceshospital medical staffNew Zealandpsychologicalresilience
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 245 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Christchurch City Council. General Information. In Christchurch City Fact Pack, 2010. resources.ccc.govt.nz/files/FactPack2010-docs.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2010.Google Scholar
2.New Zealand Police. List of deceased. In Christchurch, 2011. http://www.police.govt.nz/list-deceased. Accessed July 13, 2011.Google Scholar
3. Médecins Sans Frontières. Haiti: from one emergency to the next. In Haiti, 2010. www.msf.org.uk/haiti_one_month_on_20100212.news. Accessed November 15, 2010.Google Scholar
4.Alexander, DA, Klein, S. First responders after disasters: a review of stress reactions, at-risk, vulnerability, and resilience factors. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(2):87-94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Kreiss, Y, Merin, O, Peleg, K, et al. Early disaster response in Haiti: the Israeli field hospital experience. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(1):45-48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Bonomini, M, Stuard, S, Dal Canton, A. Dialysis practice and patient outcome in the aftermath of the earthquake at L'Aquila, Italy, April 2009. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(8):2595-2603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.McIntyre, T, Hughes, CD, Pauyo, T, et al. Emergency surgical care delivery in post-earthquake Haiti: Partners in Health and Zanmi Lasante experience. World J Surg. 2011;35(4):745-750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Sundin, EC, Horowitz, MJ. Impact of Event Scale: psychometric properties. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:205-209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Hedlund, JL, Viewig, BW. The Hamilton rating scale for depression: a comprehensive review. Journal of Operational Psychiatry. 1979;10:149-165.Google Scholar
10.Eid, J, Larsson, G, Johnsen, BH, et al. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian Impact of Event Scale-revised in a non-clinical sample. Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(5):426-432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Echevarria-Guanilo, ME, Dantas, RA, Farina, JA Jr., et al. Reliability and validity of the Impact of Event Scale (IES): version for Brazilian burn victims. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(11-12):1588-1597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Bent-Hansen, J, Bech, P. Validity of the definite and semidefinite questionnaire version of the Hamilton Depression Scale, the Hamilton Subscale and the Melancholia Scale. Part I. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;261(1):37-46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Olden, M, Rosenfeld, B, Pessin, H, Breitbart, W. Measuring depression at the end of life: is the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale a valid instrument? Assessment. 2009;16(1):43-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. The Treasury of New Zealand. Rebuilding Christchurch. In Christchurch, 2011. http://www.treasury.govt.nz/budget/2011/execsumm/06.htm. Accessed July 13, 2011.Google Scholar
15.Fan, F, Zhang, Y, Yang, Y, et al. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety among adolescents following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. J Trauma Stress. 2011;24(1):44-53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Irvin, CB, Cindrich, L, Patterson, W, Southall, A. Survey of hospital healthcare personnel response during a potential avian influenza pandemic: will they come to work? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(4):328-335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed