Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:50:21.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Secondary Ambulance Transfers During the Mass-Casualty Terrorist Attack in Israel on October 7, 2023

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2024

Evan Avraham Alpert*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center- Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Jacob Assaf
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center- Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Ahmad Nama
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center- Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Ruchama Pliner
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center- Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
Eli Jaffe
Affiliation:
Community Division, Magen David Adom, Or-Yehuda, Israel Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel Ramat Gan Academic College, Ramat Gan, Israel
*
Correspondence: Evan Avraham Alpert, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Hadassah Medical Center- Ein Kerem Kalman Mann Street, Jerusalem E-mail: avraham.alpert@mail.huji.ac.il

Abstract

On October 7, 2023, Israel experienced the worst terror attack in its history – 1,200 people were killed, 239 people were taken hostage, and 1,455 people were wounded. This mass-casualty event (MCE) was more specifically a mega terrorist attack. Due to the overwhelming number of victims who arrived at the two closest hospitals, it became necessary to implement secondary transfers to centers in other areas of the country. Historically, secondary transfer has been implemented in MCEs but usually for the transfer of critical patients from a Level 2 or Level 3 Trauma Center to a Level 1 Center. Magen David Adom (MDA), Israel’s National Emergency Pre-Hospital Medical Organization, is designated by the Health Ministry as the incident command at any MCE. On October 7, in addition to the primary transport of victims by ambulance to hospitals throughout Israel, they secondarily transported patients from the two closest hospitals – the Soroka Medical Center (SMC; Level 1 Trauma Center) in Beersheba and the Barzilai Medical Center (BMC; Level 2 Trauma Center) in Ashkelon. Secondary transport began five hours after the event started and continued for approximately 12 hours. During this time, the terrorist infiltration was still on-going. Soroka received 650 victims and secondarily transferred 26, including five in Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulances. Barzilai received 372 and secondarily transferred 38. These coordinated secondary transfers helped relieve the overwhelmed primary hospitals and are an essential component of any MCE strategy.

Type
Field Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloch, YH, Schwartz, D, Pinkert, M, et al. Distribution of casualties in a mass-casualty incident with three local hospitals in the periphery of a densely populated area: lessons learned from the medical management of a terrorist attack. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(3):186192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adini, B, Cohen, R, Glassberg, E, et al. Reconsidering policy of casualty evacuation in a remote mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(1):9195.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D, Pinkert, M, Leiba, A, et al. Significance of a Level-2, selective, secondary evacuation hospital during a peripheral town terrorist attack. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(1):5966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutierrez de Ceballos, JP, Turégano Fuentes, F, Perez Diaz, D, Sanz Sanchez, M, Martin Llorente, C, Guerrero Sanz, JE. Casualties treated at the closest hospital in the Madrid, March 11, terrorist bombings. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(1 Suppl):S107112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel Ministry of Health. https://datadashboard.health.gov.il/portal/dashboard/health. Accessed November 26, 2023.Google Scholar
Almogy, G, Belzberg, H, Mintz, Y, Pikarsky, AK, Zamir, G, Rivkind, AI. Suicide bombing attacks: update and modifications to the protocol. Ann Surg. 2004;239(3):295303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merin, O, Sonkin, R, Yitzhak, A, et al. Terrorist stabbings-distinctive characteristics and how to prepare for them. J Emerg Med. 2017;53(4):451457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsur, AM, Nadler, R, Sorkin, A, et al. Patterns in vehicle-ramming attacks. Isr Med Assoc J. 2022;24(9):579583.Google ScholarPubMed
Leiba, A, Blumenfeld, A, Hourvitz, A, et al. A four-step approach for establishment of a national medical response to mega-terrorism. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(6):436440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klausner, JM, Rozin, RR. The evacuation hospital in civilian disasters. Isr J Med Sci. 1986;22(5):365369.Google ScholarPubMed
Postma, IL, Weel, H, Heetveld, MJ, et al. Patient distribution in a mass casualty event of an airplane crash. Injury. 2013;44(11):15741578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einav, S, Feigenberg, Z, Weissman, C, et al. Evacuation priorities in mass casualty terror-related events: implications for contingency planning. Ann Surg. 2004;239(3):304310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed