Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T22:22:56.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Locally developed guidelines for the aftercare of deliberate self-harm patients in general practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

Deborah Sharp
Affiliation:
Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol
Angela Liebenau
Affiliation:
Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol
Nigel Stocks
Affiliation:
Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol
Olive Bennewith
Affiliation:
Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol
Mark Evans
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Bristol
William Bruce Jones
Affiliation:
Bath Mental Health Care Trust
Tim Peters
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol
David Goldberg
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
David Gunnell
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In England & Wales at least 140 000 people present at hospital annually following an episode of deliberate self-harm (DSH), and 12% to 16% make a repeat attempt. The time of greatest risk of repetition is within three months of an attempt. Around 50% of these patients visit their GP in the four to eight weeks after an episode of DSH. Guidelines for the aftercare of patients who have self-harmed in general practice may reduce repetition rates and could possibly have an impact on suicide rates. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical practice guideline for the aftercare of DSH patients in general practice. A modified Delphi technique was used with a consensus group consisting of GPs with an interest in mental health, psychiatrists, a psychologist, a specialist nurse, a voluntary organization and patients with a history of self-harm. The template for the guidelines was based on ICD-10 PHC. Consensus was reached on all points after two rounds of the Delphi and the guidelines were formatted to facilitate their use in the GP consultation. There is a difficulty developing guidelines for common problems where the evidence base is weak. The use of formal consensus methods can be employed but it must be acknowledged that the validity of the resulting guideline is related to the composition of the consensus group, the identification and analysis of any relevant evidence and the method of guideline dissemination. The guidelines are being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial of a general practice based intervention to reduce repeat deliberate self-harm.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2003 Arnold