Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T14:06:55.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Information Revolution and The Paradox of American Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Joseph S. Nye Jr.
Joseph S. Nye Jr.*
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard Universitysince 1995; of Defense for International Security Affairs in 1994-1995
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 97 , 2003 , pp. 67 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This lecture draws upon my book, the Paradox of American Power (2002).

2 See Esther Dyson, Release 2.1 : A Design for Living in the Digital Age (1998).

3 See Spiro, Peter J., The New Sovereigntists: American Exceptionalism and its False Prophets, 79 Foreign Aff. 9 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Ruggie, John G., Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations, 47 Int’l Org. 139, 143, 155 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See Perrritt, Henry H. Jr., The Internet as a Threat to Sovereignty? Thoughts on the Internet ‘s Role in Strengthening National and Global Governance, 5 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 423, 427 (1998)Google Scholar.

6 Sassen, Saskia, On the Internet and Sovereignty, 5 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 545, 548 (1998)Google Scholar.

7 Quinlan, Joseph & Chandler, Marc, The U.S. Trade Deficit: A Dangerous Obsession, 80 Foreign Aff. 87, 92, 95 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Hendryk Spruyt, The Sovereign State and its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems (1994).

9 See U S. Comm’n on Nat’l Sec. in the Twenty-first Century, Road Map for National Security Imperative for Change (Feb. 15, 2001) ch. 1, available at <http://www.nssg.gov/PhaseIIIFR.pdf>.

10 Adams, Sesames, Virtual Defense, 80 Foreign Aff. 98 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Adam Roberts, The So-called ‘Right’ of Humanitarian Intervention, Trinity College Paper No. 13 (2000) at 14-16, availabk at <http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/publications/papers/TP_13.pdf>.

12 See Harold Guetzkow, Multiple Loyalties: Theoretical Approach to a problem in International Organization (1955).

13 See Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (1991).

14 Pippa Norms, the Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet World wide 191 (2001).

15 Id. at 190-91.

16 James Rosenau, Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World 99-116 (1997).

17 Josef Joffe, America the Inescapable, N.Y. Times Mag., June 8, 1997, at 38.

18 A recent example can be found in German Marshall Fund, Transatlantic Trends 2003 Topline Data 21 (2003), available at <http://www.transatlanuctrends.org>.

19 United States Commission on National Security/21 St Century, Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change 4 (2001), available at <http;//www.nssg.gov/PhaseIIIFR.pdf>.