Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:21:42.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXPLORING CHALLENGES WITH DESIGNING AND DEVELOPING SHORE CONTROL CENTERS (SCC) FOR AUTONOMOUS SHIPS

Part of: Design Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

H. Dybvik ,
E. Veitch  and
M. Steinert
H. Dybvik*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
E. Veitch
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
M. Steinert
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
*
*henrikke.dybvik@ntnu.no

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The concept of remotely operated, unmanned, and autonomous ships is creating increasing interest in the maritime domain, promising safety, increased efficiency and sustainability. Shore control centers (SCCs) have been proposed to operate such vessels and some industry projects are initiated. This paper aims at bringing knowledge about what a SCC is envisioned to be. It identifies and explores challenges related to designing and developing SCCs through semi-structured interviews with the research community and industry. We discuss tasks, functions and interactions between human and machine.

Keywords

autonomous shipsshore control centerdesign knowledgeinformation retrievalearly design phase
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 847 - 856
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahvenjärvi, S. (2016), “The Human Element and Autonomous Ships”, TransNav Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp., Vol. 10, https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.10.03.18Google Scholar
DNV GL. (2018), Class Guideline DNVGL-CG-0264 Autonomous and remotely operated ships.Google Scholar
Donaldson, K.M., Ishii, K. and Sheppard, S.D. (2006), “Customer Value Chain Analysis”, Res. Eng. Des., Vol. 16, pp. 174–183, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-006-0012-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007), Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research”, Acad. Manage. Rev., Vol. 14, pp. 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endsley, M.R. (1987), “The Application of Human Factors to the Development of Expert Systems for Advanced Cockpits”, Proc. Hum. Factors Soc. Annu. Meet., Vol. 31, pp. 1388–1392. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128703101219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, C. et al. (2013), “‘Take over!’ How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon”, Soc. Annu. Meet., Vol. 57, pp. 1938–1942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433Google Scholar
IMO (2018), IMO takes first steps to address autonomous ships [WWW Document]. URL http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/08-MSC-99-MASS-scoping.aspx (accessed 11.24.19).Google Scholar
Kaber, D.B. and Endsley, M.R. (1997), “Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety”, Process Saf. Prog., Vol. 16, pp. 126–131, https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.680160304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levander, O. (2017), “Autonomous ships on the high seas”, IEEE Spectr., Vol. 54, pp. 26–31, https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2017.7833502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd's Register (2016), Cyber safe for marine [WWW Document]. Lloyds Regist. URL https://www.lr.org/en/cyber-safe-for-marine/ (accessed 11.22.19).Google Scholar
Lutzhoft, M. et al. (2019), “Human-centred maritime autonomy - An ethnography of the future”, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., Vol. 1357, p. 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1357/1/012032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lützhöft, M.H. and Dekker, S.W.A. (2002), “On Your Watch: Automation on the Bridge”, J. Navig., Vol. 55, pp. 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463301001588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallam, S.C., Nazir, S. and Sharma, A. (2019), “The human element in future Maritime Operations–perceived impact of autonomous shipping”, Ergonomics, pp. 1–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Maritime UK (2018), Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships - UK Code of Practice | Maritime UK [WWW Document]. URL: https://www.maritimeuk.org/media-centre/publications/maritime-autonomous-surface-ships-uk-code-practice/ (accessed 11.25.19).Google Scholar
Moreno, D.P. et al. (2015), “A step beyond to overcome design fixation: a design-by-analogy approach”, In: Design Computing and Cognition ’14, Springer. pp. 607–624.Google Scholar
MUNIN (2015), D8.8: Final Report: Shore Control Centre – FP7 GA-No 314286 | All MUNIN Deliverables [WWW Document]. URL: http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/news-information/downloads-information-material/munin-deliverables/ (accessed 11.25.19).Google Scholar
Musić, S. and Hirche, S. (2017), “Control sharing in human-robot team interaction”, Annu. Rev. Control, Vol. 44, pp. 342–354, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, M. et al. (2019), “Human-system concurrent task analysis for maritime autonomous surface ship operation and safety”, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., p. 106697.Google Scholar
Rødseth, ØJ and Nordahl, H. (2017), “Definitions for autonomous merchant ships”, Presented at the Norwegian Forum for Unmanned Ships, Version, pp. 2017–2020.Google Scholar
Rødseth, ØJ, Nordahl, H. and Hoem, Å. (2018), Characterization of Autonomy in Merchant Ships, in: 2018 OCEANS - MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO). Presented at the 2018 OCEANS - MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO), pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSKOBE.2018.8559061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, T.B. and Verplank, W.L. (1978), Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators, Massachusetts Inst of Tech Cambridge Man-Machine Systems Lab.10.21236/ADA057655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelmsen. (2018), Wilhelmsen and KONGSBERG establish world's first autonomous shipping company [WWW Document]. Wilhelmsen. URL: https://www.wilhelmsen.com/media-news-and-events/press-releases/2018/wilhelmsen-and-kongsberg-establish-worlds-first-autonomous-shipping-company/ (accessed 11.22.19).Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2017), Case study research and applications: Design and methods, Sage publications.Google Scholar