No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A novel heuristic approach to detect induced forming defects using point cloud scans
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The research paper delves into the importance of point cloud data obtained from 3D scanning technology ensuring quality control in industrial settings. It presents a new heuristic approach that utilizes the wavelet algorithm and other techniques to detect and characterize induced forming defects accurately. The proposed approach offers more flexibility, ease of use, and better results based on descriptive and prescriptive analyses from DRM. The results demonstrate that the wavelet algorithm was successful in identifying and characterizing forming defects in point cloud data.
- Type
- Design Methods and Tools
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Amri, A.E., Haddou, M.e.y. and Khamlichi, A. (2017), “Effect of thermal and mechanical parameter's damage numerical simulation cycling effects on defects in hot metal forming processes”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 257, p. 12047.Google Scholar
Bártová, B. and Bína, V. (2019), “Early Defect Detection Using Clustering Algorithms”, Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belnoue, J.P.-H., Mesogitis, T., Nixon-Pearson, O.J., Kratz, J., Ivanov, D.S., Partridge, I.K., Potter, K.D. and Hallett, S.R. (2017), “Understanding and predicting defect formation in automated fibre placement pre-preg laminates”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 102, pp. 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BlCessing, L.T. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer London, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisse, P., Colmars, J., Hamila, N., Naouar, N. and Steer, Q. (2018), “Bending and wrinkling of composite fiber preforms and prepregs. A review and new developments in the draping simulations”, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 141, pp. 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, W., Liu, Q. and He, Z. (2020), “Review of Pavement Defect Detection Methods”, IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 14531–14544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrysochoos, A. and Louche, H. (2000), “An infrared image processing to analyse the calorific effects accompanying strain localisation”, International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 38 No. 16, pp. 1759–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, K., Lessard, L., Pasini, D., Hojjati, M., Chen, J. and Yousefpour, A. (2011), “Experimental study of the effect of automated fiber placement induced defects on performance of composite laminates”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 484–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberly, D. (1999), “Distance Between Point and Triangle in 3D”, available at: https://www.geometrictools.com/Documentation/DistancePoint3Triangle3.pdf.Google Scholar
Heslehurst, R.B. (2014), Defects and damage in composite materials and structures, [Elektronische Ressource], CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y. (2013), Damage evolution in laminates with manufacturing defects, Licentiate thesis / Luleå University of Technology, Vol. 2013, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå.Google Scholar
Hussain, G., Al-Ghamdi, K.A., Khalatbari, H., Iqbal, A. and Hashemipour, M. (2014), “Forming Parameters and Forming Defects in Incremental Forming Process: Part B”, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 454–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M.W. (1995), “3D Distance from a Point to a Triangle”, Technical Report CSR-5-95, available at: https://www.ljll.math.upmc.fr/∼frey/papers/distance/Jones%20M.W.,%203D%20distance%20from%20a%20point%20to%20a%20triangle.pdf.Google Scholar
Jovančević, I., Pham, H.-H., Orteu, J.-J., Gilblas, R., Harvent, J., Maurice, X. and Brèthes, L. (2017), “3D Point Cloud Analysis for Detection and Characterization of Defects on Airplane Exterior Surface”, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 36 No. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Kim, M.H. and Yoo, C.K. (2010), “A new statistical framework for parameter subset selection and optimal parameter estimation in the activated sludge model”, Journal of hazardous materials, Vol. 183 No. 1-3, pp. 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, E.T., Fan, Z. and Sencer, B. (2023), “A new approach to detect surface defects from 3D point cloud data with surface normal Gabor filter (SNGF)”, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 92, pp. 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S., Zhang, M., Kadam, P. and Kuo, C.C.J. (2021), 3D Point Cloud Analysis: Traditional, Deep Learning, and Explainable Machine Learning Methods, Springer International Publishing AG, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, T., Zhou, Z., Li, Y., Yang, G., Meng, J. and Wang, Q. (2023), “Point-cloud acquisition in CFRP composites using ultrasonic location estimation with the phase-shift reference pulse”, Applied Acoustics, Vol. 211, p. 109557.Google Scholar
Marani, R. and Campos-Delgado, D.U. (2023), “Depth classification of defects in composite materials by long-pulsed thermography and blind linear unmixing”, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 248, p. 110359.Google Scholar
Margret, M.K., Ponni, A. and Priyanka, A. (2021), “Frequent Pattern Mining Using Db-Scan Algorithm”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1916 No. 1, p. 12054.Google Scholar
Márquez, F.P.G. (2013), Fault detection: Classification, techniques, and role in industrial systems, Mechanical Engineering Theory and Applications, Nova Science Publishers, Inc, New York.Google Scholar
Saeed, M., Gugliuzza, J., Liebl, M., Radjef, R., Eisenbart, B., Middendorf, P. and Kreimeyer, M. (Eds.) (2022a), Parameter Study and Optimization of Forming Simulations for Tape-Based Fiber Layups, Springer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Saeed, M., Radjef, R., Eisenbart, B. and Kreimeyer, M. (Eds.) (2022b), Simulation-Driven Design (SFE) – A Concept for Forming Simulations: Testing, Design & Simulation I.Google Scholar
Saleh, E.H., Fouad, M.M., Sayed, M.S., Badawy, W. and Abd El-Samie, F.E. (2020), “Fully Automated Fabric Defect Detection Using Additive Wavelet Transform”, Menoufia Journal of Electronic Engineering Research, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senthil, K., Arockiarajan, A., Palaninathan, R., Santhosh, B. and Usha, K.M. (2013), “Defects in composite structures: Its effects and prediction methods – A comprehensive review”, Composite Structures, Vol. 106, pp. 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, D.F., Wang, W.J. and Qu, L.S. (2004), “Defect Detection for Bearings Using Envelope Spectra of Wavelet Transform”, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Vol. 126 No. 4, pp. 567–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, L.M. (2011), Fault detection: Theory, methods and systems, Engineering Tools, Techniques and Tables, Nova Science Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Stopjakova, V., Malosek, P., Matej, M., Nagy, V. and Margala, M. (2005), “Defect Detection in Analog and Mixed Circuits by Neural Networks Using Wavelet Analysis”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woigk, W., Hallett, S.R., Jones, M.I., Kuhtz, M., Hornig, A. and Gude, M. (2018), “Experimental investigation of the effect of defects in Automated Fibre Placement produced composite laminates”, Composite Structures, Vol. 201, pp. 1004–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Z., Zhang, M., Li, C., Meng, Z., Li, Y., Chen, Y. and Liu, L. (2022), “Image Classification for Automobile Pipe Joints Surface Defect Detection Using Wavelet Decomposition and Convolutional Neural Network”, IEEE Access, Vol. 10, pp. 77191–77204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ying, Y.L. and Chen, D.E. (2013), “Defect Detection in Patterned Fabrics Using Wavelet Filter”, Advanced Materials Research, 756-759, pp. 3831–3834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, G. and Chen, Y. (2022), Towards optimal point cloud processing for 3D reconstruction, SpringerBriefs in electrical and computer engineering. SpringerBriefs in signal processing, 1st ed., Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Qi, J., Wan, P., Wang, H., Xie, D., Wang, X. and Yan, G. (2016), “An Easy-to-Use Airborne LiDAR Data Filtering Method Based on Cloth Simulation”, Remote Sensing, Vol. 8 No. 6, p. 501.Google Scholar
Zimmerling, C., Poppe, C. and Kärger, L. (2020), “Estimating Optimum Process Parameters in Textile Draping of Variable Part Geometries - A Reinforcement Learning Approach”, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 47, pp. 847–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerling, C., Poppe, C., Stein, O. and Kärger, L. (2022), “Optimisation of manufacturing process parameters for variable component geometries using reinforcement learning”, Materials & Design, Vol. 214, p. 110423.Google Scholar
Zöcke, C. (2010), “Quantitative analysis of defects in composite material by means of optical lockin thermography. Analyse quantitative de défauts dans des pièces en matériau composite par la méthode de thermographie lockin”, Université Paul Verlaine - Metz, 2010.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access