No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
What's the catch? Trade-off challenges in early design for sustainability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Trade-offs involving multiple criteria that cannot be satisfied at the same time are ubiquitous in engineering design activities. Navigating trade-off decisions can be challenging, especially when it comes to sustainability-related decisions in early-stage projects. Through a systematic literature review, we unravel the challenges related to sustainability trade-offs in technology development, concept design, and other front-end of innovation activities. The challenges, which were evaluated by experts from industry and academia, range from technical and organisational to psychological aspects.
- Type
- Design for Sustainability
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Abbas, A.E. (2015), “Perspectives on Some Widely Used Methods of Multi-Objective Decision Making in Systems Engineering”, IIE Annual Conference, pp. 1143–1151.Google Scholar
Andreasen, M.M., Hansen, C.T. and Cash, P. (2015), Conceptual Design, Conceptual Design: Interpretations, Mindset and Models, Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19839-2.Google Scholar
Angelo, A.C.M. and Marujo, L.G. (2020), “Life cycle sustainability assessment and decision-making under uncertainties”, Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for Decision-Making, Elsevier, pp. 253–268. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818355-7.00012-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmone, A.S. and Chew, M.Y.L. (2018), “Merging building maintainability and sustainability assessment: A multicriteria decision making approach”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 117, Institute of Physics Publishing, p. 012029. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/117/1/012029.Google Scholar
Bekius, F., Meijer, S. and Thomassen, H. (2022), “A Real Case Application of Game Theoretical Concepts in a Complex Decision-Making Process: Case Study ERTMS”, Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer Science and Business Media B.V., Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 153–185. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09762-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belecheanu, R., Riedel, J.C.K.H. and Pawar, K.S. (2005), “An investigation of design trade-offs in the automotive industry”, 2005 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE), IEEE, pp. 1–10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ITMC.2005.7461306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belton, V. and Stewart, T.J. (2002), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Springer US. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, A., Bertoni, M. and Johansson, C. (2015), “ANALYSING THE EFFECTS OF VALUE DRIVERS AND KNOWLEDGE MATURITY IN PRELIMINARY DESIGN DECISION-MAKING”, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15), Milan, Italy, p. 10.Google Scholar
Bertoni, A., Yi, X., Baron, C., Esteban, P. and Vingerhoeds, R. (2020), “A framework for data-driven design in a product innovation process: data analysis and visualisation for model-based decision making”, International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 68–94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2020.10028179.Google Scholar
Bertoni, M. (2017), “Introducing Sustainability in Value Models to Support Design Decision Making: A Systematic Review”, Sustainability, MDPI, Vol. 9 No. 6, p. 994. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9060994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, M., Bertoni, A. and Isaksson, O. (2018), “EVOKE: A Value-Driven Concept Selection Method for Early System Design”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Springer Verlag, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 46–77. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11518-016-5324-2.Google Scholar
Bigolin, M., Danilevicz, Â.D.M.F., Weiss, M.A. and Silva Filho, L.C.P. (2021), “Sustainable New Product Development: a decision-making tool for the construction industry”, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Taylor and Francis Ltd., Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 618–629. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1920642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byggeth, S. and Hochschorner, E. (2006), “Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier, Vol. 14 No. 15–16, pp. 1420–1430. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2005.03.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D. and Van Aken, J.E. (2008), “Developing design propositions through research synthesis”, Organization Studies, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 393–413. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwarakanath, S. and Wallace, K.M. (1995), “Decision-making in Engineering Design: Observations from Design Experiments”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 191–206. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544829508907913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrukh, C. and Holgado, M. (2020), “Integrating sustainable value thinking into technology forecasting: A configurable toolset for early stage technology assessment”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier Inc., Vol. 158. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120171.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S., Drobac, K.; and Bryden, K.M. (2023), “Solving Tomorrow's Design Challenges Requires New Tools for Large World Decision-Making”, INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, pp. 24–28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R.B. (2006), “BEYOND THE PILLARS: SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT AS A FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE INTEGRATION OF SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN SIGNIFICANT DECISION-MAKING”, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 08 No. 03, pp. 259–280. https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, R., Missimer, M. and Mesquita, P.L. (2017), “Using social sustainability principles to analyse activities of the extraction lifecycle phase: Learnings from designing support for concept selection”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 140, pp. 267–276. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustavsson, H. and Sterner, J. (2008), “An Industrial Case Study of Design Methodology and Decision Making for Automotive Electronics”, Volume 4: 20th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; Second International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems, ASMEDC, pp. 77–86. https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2008-49901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harivardhini, S., Murali Krishna, K. and Chakrabarti, A. (2017), “An Integrated Framework for supporting decision making during early design stages on end-of-life disassembly”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 168, pp. 558–574. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazelrigg, G.A. (1998), “A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Arlignton, Vol. 120.Google Scholar
Hoffenson, S. and Söderberg, R. (2015), “Systems Thinking in Tolerance and Quality-related Design Decision-making”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 27, Elsevier B.V., pp. 59–64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihlander, I. (2011), “EXPLORING A DECISION-MAKING FORUM IN EARLY PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT”, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, pp. 360–369.Google Scholar
Kihlander, I. and Ritzén, S. (2012), “Compatibility before completeness—Identifying intrinsic conflicts in concept decision making for technical systems”, Technovation, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 79–89. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J., D'Amore, R., Elkins, C., et al. (2001), “Providing Clarity and A Common Language to the ‘Fuzzy Front End’”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 46–55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2001.11671418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravchenko, M., Pigosso, D.C.A. and McAloone, T.C. (2020a), “DEVELOPING A TOOL TO SUPPORT DECISIONS IN SUSTAINABILITY-RELATED TRADE-OFF SITUATIONS: UNDERSTANDING NEEDS AND CRITERIA”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 265–274. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/DSD.2020.137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravchenko, M., Pigosso, D.C.A. and McAloone, T.C. (2020b), “A Trade-Off Navigation Framework as a Decision Support for Conflicting Sustainability Indicators within Circular Economy Implementation in the Manufacturing Industry”, Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 314, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Vol. 13 No. 1, p. 314. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/SU13010314.Google Scholar
Lawani, A., Flin, R., Ojo-Adedokun, R.F. and Benton, P. (2023), “Naturalistic decision making and decision drivers in the front end of complex projects”, International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 41 No. 6, p. 102502. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102502.Google Scholar
Lecomte, C. and Blanco, E. (2015), “DEALING WITH NON-TRADE-OFFS FOR FRUGAL DESIGN”, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15), Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
Luttropp, C. and Lagerstedt, J. (2006), “EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development”. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, C.A., Bryden, K.A. and Prisacari, A.A. (2020), “Integrating narratives into decision making for complex systems engineering design issues”, Systems Engineering, John Wiley and Sons Inc., Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 65–81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sys.21507.Google Scholar
de Magalhães, R.F., Danilevicz, Â. de, M.F. and Palazzo, J. (2019), “Managing trade-offs in complex scenarios: A decision-making tool for sustainability projects”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier, Vol. 212, pp. 447–460. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.12.023.Google Scholar
Maksimovic, M., Al-Ashaab, A., Sulowski, R. and Shehab, E. (2012), “Knowledge visualization in product development using trade-off curves”, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEE, pp. 708–711. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2012.6837831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAloone, T.C. and Pigosso, D.C.A. (2018), “Ecodesign Implementation and LCA”, in Hauschild, M., Rosenbaum, R. and Olsen, S. (Eds.), Life Cycle Assessment, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 545–576. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison-Saunders, A. and Pope, J. (2013), “Conceptualising and managing trade-offs in sustainability assessment”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Elsevier, Vol. 38, pp. 54–63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2012.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, J. (1992), Concurrent Development in Manufacturing - Based on Dispositional Mechanisms, PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, available at: (accessed 30 June 2022).Google Scholar
de Oliveira, M.G., Rozenfeld, H., Phaal, R. and Probert, D. (2015), “Decision making at the front end of innovation: the hidden influence of knowledge and decision criteria”, R&D Management, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 161–180. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/radm.12058.Google Scholar
Oliveira, M.G., Rozenfeld, H., Phaal, R. and Probert, D. (2012), “Proposal of a Method to Clarify and Enhance Decision-making at the Front-end of Innovation”, Proceedings of PICMET ’12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, pp. 600–610.Google Scholar
Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., et al. (2021), “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews”, BMJ, p. n71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnell, G.S., Driscoll, P.J. and Henderson, D.L. (2010), “Decision Making in Systems Engineering and Management: Second Edition”, Decision Making in Systems Engineering and Management: Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470926963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parolin, G., Eriksen, H.A., Arnbjerg, J., McAloone, T.C. and Pigosso, D.C.A. (2023), “Towards early environmental sustainability assessment in technology development – understanding and overcoming challenges”, 2023 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), IEEE, pp. 1–9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC58018.2023.10332343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parolin, G., McAloone, T.C. and Pigosso, D.C.A. (2023), “THE EFFECTS OF SCENARIOS ON DECISION-MAKING QUALITY IN EARLY DESIGN – AN EMPIRICAL STUDY”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 3, pp. 3375–3384. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.338.Google Scholar
Parolin, G., McAloone, T.C. and Pigosso, D.C.A. (2024), “How can technology assessment tools support sustainable innovation? A systematic literature review and synthesis”, Technovation, Vol. 129, p. 102881. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, M., Hsuan, J. and Kvysgaard Hansen, P. (2021), “IMPROVING DECISION MAKING IN PRODUCT MODULARIZATION BY GAME-BASED MANAGEMENT TRAINING”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1837–1846. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigosso, D.C.A., Mcaloone, T.C. and Rozenfeld, H. (2014), “Systematization of best practices for ecodesign implementation”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Dubrovnik, pp. 1651–1662.Google Scholar
Renzi, C. and Leali, F. (2017), “Decision-making methods in engineering design: a designer-oriented approach”, Dirección y Organización, Vol. 63, pp. 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzi, C., Leali, F. and Di Angelo, L. (2017), “A review on decision-making methods in engineering design for the automotive industry”, Journal of Engineering Design, Taylor and Francis Ltd., Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 118–143. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2016.1274720.Google Scholar
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B. and Nijkamp, P. (2015), “A systemic framework for sustainability assessment”, Ecological Economics, Elsevier, Vol. 119, pp. 314–325. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2015.09.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serenella, S., Mathieux, F. and Pant, R. (2015), “Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Supporting Decision Making by Business and Policy”, Sustainability Assessment of Renewables-Based Products, Wiley, pp. 201–214. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118933916.ch13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shehabuddeen, N., Probert, D. and Phaal, R. (2006), “From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework”, Technovation, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 324–335. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiu, E. (2015), “DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABILITY – TRADE-OFF DILEMMAS FROM THE CONSUMER PERSPECTIVE”, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15), Milan, Italy, pp. 239–248.Google Scholar
Singhaputtangkul, N. (2017), “A decision support tool to mitigate decision-making problems faced by a building design team”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Emerald Publishing, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 2–18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-06-2016-0009.Google Scholar
Stevels, A. (2001), “Application of EcoDesign: ten years of dynamic development”, Proceedings Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, IEEE Comput. Soc, pp. 905–915. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ECODIM.2001.992491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarne, P., Lehmann, A., Kantner, M. and Finkbeiner, M. (2019), “Introducing a product sustainability budget at an automotive company—one option to increase the use of LCSA results in decision-making processes”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Springer Verlag, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 1461–1479. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1576-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, D.L. and Srinivasan, S. (2003), “Constrained Optimization for Green Engineering Decision-Making”, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 37 No. 23, pp. 5389–5397. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0344359.Google ScholarPubMed
Tonn, B.E. (2003), “The future of futures decision making”, Futures, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 673–688. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00106-4.Google Scholar
Vargas-Berrones, K.X., Sarmiento, R. and Whelan, G. (2020), “Can you have your cake and eat it? Investigating trade-offs in the implementation of green initiatives”, Production Planning & Control, Taylor and Francis Ltd., Vol. 31 No. 11–12, pp. 845–860. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1695923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villamil, C. and Hallstedt, S. (2021), “Sustainabilty integration in product portfolio for sustainable development: Findings from the industry”, Business Strategy and the Environment, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 388–403. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, C. and Deubel, T. (2003), “New theory-based concepts for PDM and PLM”, in Folkeson, A., Gralen, K., Norell, M. and Sellgren, U. (Eds.), DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, pp. 429–430.Google Scholar
Wilkof, M. V. (1989), “Organisational culture and decision making: a case of consensus management”, R&D Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 185–200. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1989.tb00638.x.Google Scholar
Yahaya, S. and Abu-Bakar, N. (2007), “New product development management issues and decision-making approaches”, Management Decision, Vol. 45 No. 7, pp. 1123–1142. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740710773943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access