Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T04:15:22.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the number of holomorphic mappings between Riemann surfaces of finite analytic type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

Yoichi Imayoshi
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Osaka City University, Sugimotocyo, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka 558-0022, Japan (imayoshi@sci.osaka-cu.ac.jp)
Manabu Ito
Affiliation:
10-20-101, Hirano-kita 1-chome, Hirano-ku, Osaka 547-0041, Japan (cbj89070@pop02.odn.ne.jp)
Hiroshi Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Department of Integrated Arts and Science, Okinawa National College of Technology, 905 Henoko, Nago City, Okinawa 905-2192, Japan (yamamoto@okinawa-ct.ac.jp)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The set of non-constant holomorphic mappings between two given compact Riemann surfaces of genus greater than 1 is always finite. This classical statement was made by de Franchis. Furthermore, bounds on the cardinality of the set depending only on the genera of the surfaces have been obtained by a number of mathematicians. The analysis is carried over in this paper to the case of Riemann surfaces of finite analytic type (i.e. compact Riemann surfaces minus a finite set of points) so that the finiteness result, together with a crude but explicit bound depending only on the topological data, may be extended for the number of holomorphic mappings between such surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2011

References

1.de Franchis, M., Un teorema sulle involuzioni irrazionali, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 36 (1913), 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Farkas, H. and Kra, I., Riemann surfaces (Springer, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Forster, O., Lectures on Riemann surfaces, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Volume 81, (Springer, 1991).Google Scholar
4.Griffiths, P. and Harris, J., Principles of algebraic geometry, Wiley Classics Library (Wiley, 1994).Google Scholar
5.Gunning, R. C., Lectures on Riemann surfaces, Princeton Mathematical Notes (Princeton University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
6.Hopf, H., Beiträge zur Klassifizerung der Flächenabbildungen, J. Reine Angew. Math. 165 (1931), 225236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ito, M., Hurwitz relations and Castelnuovo-Severi's bilinear forms, preprint (2010).Google Scholar
8.Ito, M. and Yamamoto, H., Holomorphic mappings between compact Riemann surfaces, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 52 (2009), 109126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Lehner, J., Discontinuous groups and automorphic functions, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Volume 8 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1964).Google Scholar
10.Martens, H. H., Observations on morphisms of closed Riemann surfaces, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 10 (1978), 209212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Martens, H. H., Mappings of closed Riemann surfaces, in Theta functions, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Volume 49, pp. 531539 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1989).Google Scholar
12.Mednykh, I. A., On holomorphic maps between Riemann surfaces of genera three and two, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 424 (2009), 165167 (in Russian).Google Scholar
13.Tanabe, M., On rigidity of holomorphic maps of Riemann surfaces, Osaka J. Math. 33 (1996), 485496.Google Scholar
14.Tanabe, M., A bound for the theorem of de Franchis, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 127 (1999), 22892295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar