Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T04:36:54.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrodynamical Simulations of Misaligned Accretion Discs in Binary Systems: Companions tear discs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2023

S. Doğan
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy & Space Sciences, University of Ege, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey
C. J. Nixon
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
A. R. King
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK Anton Pannekoek Institute, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, NL-2333 CA Leiden, Netherlands
J. E. Pringle
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK
D. Price
Affiliation:
Monash Centre for Astrophysics (MoCA), School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Vic. 3800, Australia email: suzan.dogan@ege.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Accretion discs appear in many astrophysical systems. In most cases, these discs are probably not completely axisymmetric. Discs in binary systems are often found to be misaligned with respect to the binary orbit. In this case, the gravitational torque from a companion induces nodal precession in misaligned rings of gas. We first calculate whether this precession is strong enough to overcome the internal disc torques communicating angular momentum. For typical parameters, precession torque wins. To check this result, we perform numerical simulations using the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics code, PHANTOM, and confirm that sufficiently thin and sufficiently inclined discs can break into distinct planes that precess effectively independently. Disc tearing is widespread and severely changes the disc structure. It enhances dissipation and promotes stronger accretion onto the central object. We also perform a stability analysis on isolated warped discs to understand the physics of disc breaking and tearing observed in numerical simulations. The instability appears in the form of viscous anti-diffusion of the warp amplitude and the surface density. The discovery of disc breaking and tearing has revealed new physical processes that dramatically change the evolution of accretion discs, with obvious implications for observed systems.

Type
Contributed Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Aly, H., Dehnen, W., Nixon, C., King, A., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 65. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artymowicz, P., Lubow, S. H., 1994, ApJ, 421, 651.Google Scholar
Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., Clarke, C. J., Lubow, S. H., Ogilvie, G. I., Pringle, J. E., Tout, C. A., 2000, MNRAS, 317, 773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doğan, S., Nixon, C., King, A., Price, D. J., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doğan, S., Nixon, C. J., King, A. R., Pringle, J. E., 2018, MNRAS, 476, 1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doğan, S., Nixon, C. J., 2020, MNRAS, 495, 1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facchini, S., Lodato, G., Price, D. J., 2013, MNRAS, 433, 2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, J., King, A., Raine, D. J., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: 3rd Edn. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodato, G., Price, D. J., 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1212.Google Scholar
Martin, R. G., Nixon, C., Lubow, S. H., Armitage, P. J., Price, D. J., Doğan, S., King, A., 2014, ApJL, 792, L33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, C. J., King, A. R., 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, C., King, A., Price, D., Frank, J., 2012, ApJL, 757, L24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, C., King, A., Price, D., 2013, MNRAS, 434, 1946.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, G. I., 1999, MNRAS, 304, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, G. I., 2000, MNRAS, 317, 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaloizou, J. C. B., Pringle, J. E., 1983, MNRAS, 202, 1181.Google Scholar
Price, D. J., Wurster, J., Tricco, T. S., Nixon, C., Toupin, S., Pettitt, A., Chan, C., et al., 2018, PASA, 35, e031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, J. E., 1981, ARA&A, 19, 137.Google Scholar
Shakura, N. I., Sunyaev, R. A., 1973, A&A, 24, 337.Google Scholar